Have a personal or library account? Click to login

‘And we are Stuck in One Place, Minister.’ A Study of Evasiveness in Replies to Face-Threatening Questions in Slovak Political Interviews on Scandals (A Combined Approach)

Open Access
|Dec 2021

References

  1. [1] Bull, P., and Mayer, K. (1993). How not to answer questions in political interviews. Political psychology, 14(4), pages 651–666. Accessible at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3791379.
  2. [2] Jucker, J. (1986). News Interviews: A Pragmalinguistic Analysis. Amsterdam: Gieben.10.1075/pb.vii.4
  3. [3] Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual: Essays in face to face behaviour. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
  4. [4] Brown & Levinson in Huang, Y. (2013). Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  5. [5] Elliott, J., and Bull, P. (1996). A Question of Threat: Face Threats in Questions Posed During Televised Political Interviews. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 6, pages 49–72.10.1002/(SICI)1099-1298(199602)6:1<49::AID-CASP355>3.0.CO;2-H
  6. [6] Chilton, P. (2004). Analysing political discourse. Theory and practise. Routledge, 2004.10.4324/9780203561218
  7. [7] Lakoff, G., and Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  8. [8] Dulebová, I. (2009). Jazykové prostriedky manipulácie v modernom ruskom a slovenskom politickom diskurze. In Literatúra v kontexte slovanskej kultúry 20. storočia, pages 96–101, Banská Bystrica: UMB.
  9. [9] Ryabova, T., and Ryabov, O. (2011). The real man of politics in Russia: On gender discourse as a resource for the authority, 42, pages 58–71.
  10. [10] Have, P. (2007). Doing conversation analysis. A practical guide. London: Sage.10.4135/9781849208895
  11. [11] Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., and Svartivik, J. (1985). A Comprehensive Grammar of the English language. London: Longman.
  12. [12] Edmüller, A., and Wilhelm, T. (2010). La Manipulation. L’art d’influencer à vôtre portée. Édition française. Ixelles: Les Miniguides Ecolibris.
  13. [13] Gabrielsen, J., Jonch-Clausen, H., and Pontoppidan, Ch. (2017). Answering without answering: Shifting as an evasive strategy. Journalism, 21(9), pages 1355–1370.
  14. [14] Charteris-Black, J. (2011). Politicians and rhetoric: the persuasive power of metaphor. London: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230319899
  15. [15] Chudinov, A. P. (2001). Rossia v metaforicheskom zerkale: kognitivnoe issledovanie politicheskoy metafory (1991–2000). Ekaterinburg: Ural.
  16. [16] Habermas, J. (1989). The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere. English translation. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  17. [17] Dijk, V. (1998). Ideology. London: Sage.
  18. [18] Gaufman, E. (2018). Money can’t buy it? Everyday Geopolitics in Post-Soviet Russia. In Informal nationalism after communism. London: I. B. Tauris.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jazcas-2021-0062 | Journal eISSN: 1338-4287 | Journal ISSN: 0021-5597
Language: English
Page range: 690 - 704
Published on: Dec 30, 2021
Published by: Slovak Academy of Sciences, Mathematical Institute
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2021 Jana Lokajová, published by Slovak Academy of Sciences, Mathematical Institute
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.