Have a personal or library account? Click to login

Acquiring Word Order in Slovak as a Foreign Language: Comparison of Slavic and Non-Slavic Learners Utilizing Corpus Data

Open Access
|Dec 2021

References

  1. [1] Hana, J. (2007). Czech Clitics in Higher Order Grammar. Columbus: The Ohio State University, 281 p.
  2. [2] Uhlířová, L. (1987). Knížka o slovosledu. Praha: Academia, 160 p.
  3. [3] Ellis, R., and Barkhuizen, G. (2005). Analysing Learner Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 416 p.
  4. [4] Mistrík, J. (1966). Slovosled a vetosled v slovenčine. Bratislava: Vydavateľstvo slovenskej akadémie vied, 276 p.
  5. [5] Kačala, J. (2013). Syntagmatický slovosled v slovenčine. Martin: Vydavateľstvo Matice slovenskej, 220 p.
  6. [6] Franks, S., and King, T. H. (2000). A Handbook of Slavic clitics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 424 p.
  7. [7] Beličová, H., and Uhlířová, L. (1996). Slovanská věta. Praha: Euroslavica, 277 p.
  8. [8] Uhlířová, L., Kosta, P., and Veselovská, L. (2017). Klitikon. In P. Karlík, M. Nekula and J. Pleskalová (eds.), Nový encyklopedický slovník češtiny. Masarykova univerzita, Brno. Accessible at: https://www.czechency.org/slovnik/KLITIKON.
  9. [9] Starý Kořánová, I. (2017). Příklonky a vazaly infinitivu. Studie z aplikované lingvistiky, 11 (special issue), pages 109–120.
  10. [10] Omnia Slovaca III Maior. Accessible at: http://ske.juls.savba.sk/bonito/index.html, (Cited 17.03.2021).
  11. [11] Avgustinova, T., and Oliva, K. (1995). On the nature of the Wackernagel position in Czech. In U. Junghanns and G. Zybatow (eds.), Formale Slavistik, pages 25–47, Vervuert, Frankfurt am Main.
  12. [12] Junghanns, U. (2002). Clitic climbing im Tschechischen. Linguistische Arbeitsberichte, 2002(80), pages 57–90.
  13. [13] Kosek, P. (2011). Enklitika v češtině barokní doby. Brno: Host, 360 p.
  14. [14] Palková, Z. (1994). Fonetika a fonologie češtiny. Praha: Karolinum, 367 p.
  15. [15] Slovenský národný korpus – errkorp-0.1. Bratislava: Jazykovedný ústav Ľ. Štúra SAV 2019. (Pre-pilot version not accesible for public.).
  16. [16] Ivanová, M., Kyseľová, M., and Gálisová, A. (2021). Acquiring word order in Slovak as a foreign language: comparison of Slavic and Non-Slavic learners utilizing corpus data [Data set]. Zenodo. Accessible at: http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4625429.
  17. [17] Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), pages 37–46.10.1177/001316446002000104
  18. [18] Glen, S. “Cohen’s Kappa Statistic” From StatisticsHowTo.com: Elementary Statistics for the rest of us! Accessible at: https://www.statisticshowto.com/cohens-kappa-statistic/, (Cited 05.03.2021).
  19. [19] Ortega, L. (2003). Syntactic Complexity Measures and their Relationship to L2 Proficiency: A Research Synthesis of College-level L2 Writing. Applied Linguistics, 24(4), pages 492–518.10.1093/applin/24.4.492
  20. [20] De Clercq, B., and Housen, A. (2017). A Cross-Linguistic Perspective on Syntactic Complexity in L2 Development: Syntactic Elaboration and Diversity. The Modern Language Journal, 101(2), pages 315–334.10.1111/modl.12396
  21. [21] Klein, W., and Perdue, C. (1997). The Basic Variety (or: Couldn’t natural languages be much simpler?). Second Language Research, 13(4), pages 301–347.10.1191/026765897666879396
  22. [22] Byrnes, H. (2009). Emergent L2 German writing ability in a curricular context: A longitudinal study of grammatical metaphor. Linguistics and Education, 20(1), pages 50–66.10.1016/j.linged.2009.01.005
  23. [23] Ortega, L. (2012). Interlanguage complexity: A construct in search of theoretical renewal. In B. Kortmann and B. Szmrecsanyi (eds.), Linguistic complexity: Second language acquisition, indigenization, contact, pages 127–155, De Gruyter, Berlin.
  24. [24] Biber, D., Nekrasova, T., and Horn, B. (2011). The Effectiveness of Feedback for L1-English and L2-Writing Development: A Meta-Analysis. ETS Research Report Series, 2011(1), pages i–99.10.1002/j.2333-8504.2011.tb02241.x
  25. [25] Biber. D., and Gray, B. (2011). Grammatical change in the noun phrase: The influence of written language use. English Language and Linguistics, 15(2), pages 223–250.10.1017/S1360674311000025
  26. [26] Norris, J. M., and Ortega, L. (2009). Towards an Organic Approach to Investigating CAF in Instructed SLA: The Case of Complexity. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), pages 555–578.10.1093/applin/amp044
  27. [27] Bardovi-Harlig, K., and Bofman, T. (1989). Attainment of Syntactic and Morphological Accuracy by Advanced Language Learners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 11(1), pages 17–34.10.1017/S0272263100007816
  28. [28] Wolfe-Quintero, K., Inagaki, S., and Kim, H.-Y. (1998). Second Language Development in Writing: Measures of Fluency, Accuracy, and Complexity. University of Hawai’i, Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Centre, Honolulu.
  29. [29] Vyatkina, N. (2012). The Development of Second Language Writing Complexity in Groups and Individuals: A Longitudinal Learner Corpus Study. Modern Language Journal, 96(4), pages 576–598.10.1111/j.1540-4781.2012.01401.x
  30. [30] Amzallag, O. (2019). 3rd Person Object Pronoun Use in French Beginning Textbooks. Journal of Second and Multiple Language Acquisition – JSMULA 7(1), pages 15–47.
  31. [31] Viberg, Å. (2002). Basic Verbs in Second Language Acquisition. Revue française de linguistique appliquée, 7(2), pages 61–79.10.3917/rfla.072.0061
  32. [32] Manova, S. (2015). Affix Order and the Structure of the Slavic Word. In S. Manova (ed.), Affix Ordering Across Languages and Frameworks, pages 205–230, Oxford University Press, New York.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190210434.003.0009
  33. [33] Haspelmath, M. (2001). The European linguistic area: Standard Average European. In M. Haspelmath (ed.), Language typology and language universals. (Handbücher zur Sprachund Kommunikationswissenschaft), pages 1492–1510, de Gruyter, Berlin.10.1515/9783110171549.2.14.1492
  34. [34] Odlin, T. (1997; first published 1989). Language Transfer. Cross-linguistic influence in language learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 210 p.10.1017/CBO9781139524537
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jazcas-2021-0033 | Journal eISSN: 1338-4287 | Journal ISSN: 0021-5597
Language: English
Page range: 353 - 370
Published on: Dec 30, 2021
Published by: Slovak Academy of Sciences, Mathematical Institute
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2021 Martina Ivanová, Miroslava Kyseľová, Anna Gálisová, published by Slovak Academy of Sciences, Mathematical Institute
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.