Towards Reciprocal Deverbal Nouns in Czech: From Reciprocal Verbs to Reciprocal Nouns

Václava Kettnerová; Markéta Lopatková

doi:10.2478/jazcas-2019-0072

.blurhash-client-img { display: none !important; }

Towards Reciprocal Deverbal Nouns in Czech: From Reciprocal Verbs to Reciprocal Nouns

Journal of Linguistics/Jazykovedný casopis

Volume 70 (2019): Issue 2 (December 2019)

By: Václava Kettnerová and Markéta Lopatková

Open Access

|Dec 2019

Abstract

Reciprocal verbs are widely debated in the current linguistics. However, other parts of speech can be characterized by reciprocity as well – in contrast to verbs, their analysis is underdeveloped so far. In this paper, we make an attempt to fill this gap, applying results of the description of Czech reciprocal verbs to nouns derived from these verbs. We show that many aspects characteristic of reciprocal verbs hold for reciprocal nouns as well.

References

[1] Nedjalkov, V. P. (ed.) (2007). Reciprocal Constructions. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.71
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[2] Evans, N., Gaby, A., Levinson, S. C., and Majid, A. (eds.) (2011). Reciprocals and Semantic Typology. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.98
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[3] König, E., and Gast, V. (eds.) (2008). Reciprocals and reflexives: cross-linguistic and theoretical explorations. Berlin/New York, Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110199147
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[4] Maslova, E. (2008). Reflexive encoding of reciprocity. In E. König, V. Gast (eds.), Reciprocals and reflexives: cross-linguistic and theoretical explorations, pages 227‒257, Berlin/New York, Mouton de Gruyter.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[5] Reinhart, T., and Siloni, T. (2005). The Lexicon-Syntax Parameter: Reflexivization and Other Arity Operations. Linguistic Inquiry, 36(3), pages 389–436.10.1162/0024389054396881
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[6] Mel’čuk, I. A. (1988). Dependency Syntax: Theory and Practice. Albany, State University of New York Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[7] Panevová, J. (1999). Česká reciproční zájmena a slovesná valence. Slovo a slovesnost, 60(4), pages 269‒275.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[8] Panevová, J. (2007). Znovu o reciprocitě. Slovo a slovesnost, 68(2), pages 91‒100.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[9] Panevová, J., and Mikulová, M. (2007). On reciprocity. In The Prague Bulletin of Mathematical Linguistics, 87, pages 27–40.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[10] Panevová, J., Hajičová, E., Kettnerová, V., Lopatková, M., Mikulová, M., and Ševčíková, M. (2014). Mluvnice současné češtiny 2, Syntax na základě anotovaného korpusu. Praha, Karolinum.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[11] Medová, L. (2009). Reflexive Clitics in the Slavic and Romance Languages. A Comparative View from an Antipassive Perspective. PhD thesis, Princeton, Princeton University.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[12] Grepl, M., and Karlík, P. (1999). Skladba češtiny. Olomouc, Votobia.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[13] Kettnerová V., and Lopatková, M. (2018). Lexicographic Potential of Syntactic Properties of Verbs: The Case of Reciprocity in Czech. In XVIII EURALEX International Congress, Lexicography in Global Contexts, pages 685–698, Ljubljana, Ljubljana University Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[14] Sgall, P., Hajičová, E., and Panevová, J. (1986). The Meaning of the Sentence in Its Semantic and Pragmatic Aspects. Dordrecht, Reidel.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[15] Panevová, J. (1994). Valency Frames and the Meaning of the Sentence. In P. A. Luelsdorff (ed.), The Prague School of Structural and Functional Linguistics, pages 223–243, Amsterdam/Philadelphia, John Benjamins.10.1075/llsee.41.09pan
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[16] Dvořak, V. (2017). Verbální substantivum. In P. Karlík, M. Nekula, J. Pleskalová (eds.), Nový encyklopedický slovník češtiny. Praha, Nakladatelství Lidové noviny.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[17] Evans, N., Gaby, A., and Nordlinger, R. (2007). Valency mismatches and the coding of reciprocity in Australian languages. In Linguistic Typology, 11, pages 541–597.10.1515/LINGTY.2007.033
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[18] Kolářová, V. (2010). Valence deverbativních substantiv v češtině (na materiálu substantiv s dativní valencí). Praha, Karolinum.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[19] Dvořak, V. (2017). Dějové substantivum. In P. Karlík, M. Nekula, and J. Pleskalová (eds.), Nový encyklopedický slovník češtiny. Praha, Nakladatelství Lidové noviny.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[20] Gleitman, L. R., Gleitman, H., Miller, C., and Ostrin, R. (1996). Similar, and similar concepts. Cognition, 58, pages 321–376.10.1016/0010-0277(95)00686-9
Search in Google Scholar Back to article

Articles in this issue

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jazcas-2019-0072 | Journal eISSN: 1338-4287 | Journal ISSN: 0021-5597

Journal RSS Feed

Language: English

Page range: 434 - 443

Published on: Dec 21, 2019

Published by: Slovak Academy of Sciences, Ľudovít Štúr Institute of Linguistics

In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

Publication frequency: 3 issues per year

Keywords:

reciprocity,

deverbal nouns,

lexical and syntactic reciprocal nouns

Related subjects:

Linguistics and semiotics,

Theoretical frameworks and disciplines,

Linguistics, other

© 2019 Václava Kettnerová, Markéta Lopatková, published by Slovak Academy of Sciences, Ľudovít Štúr Institute of Linguistics
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Volume 70 (2019): Issue 2 (December 2019)