Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Urban Bees Benefit from a Native Forest Species Grown in a City Environment–A Case Study of Geranium Phaeum L. Cover

Urban Bees Benefit from a Native Forest Species Grown in a City Environment–A Case Study of Geranium Phaeum L.

Open Access
|Dec 2021

Figures & Tables

Fig. 1

Mean daily number of open flowers on G. phaeum plant (n=5) in 2015, Lublin, SE Poland.
Mean daily number of open flowers on G. phaeum plant (n=5) in 2015, Lublin, SE Poland.

Fig. 2

Insect visits expressed as the percentage of total visits to the flowers of G. phaeum recorded in a particular study year and groups of flower visitors in Lublin, SE Poland. Numbers in brackets show the number of censuses
Insect visits expressed as the percentage of total visits to the flowers of G. phaeum recorded in a particular study year and groups of flower visitors in Lublin, SE Poland. Numbers in brackets show the number of censuses

Fig. 3

Effect of floral phases on nectar traits in G. phaeum. Mean values for 2015 season are given (n = number of samples). Vertical whiskers indicate SD and the same letters next to the mean indicate no statistically significant differences for a given trait between floral phases (HSD Tukey's test, p<.05).
Effect of floral phases on nectar traits in G. phaeum. Mean values for 2015 season are given (n = number of samples). Vertical whiskers indicate SD and the same letters next to the mean indicate no statistically significant differences for a given trait between floral phases (HSD Tukey's test, p<.05).

Fig. 4

Mean nectar sugar amount, caloric value of nectar and pollen amount delivered daily by G. phaeum plant (n=5) in 2015, Lublin, SE Poland. Vertical whiskers show SD
Mean nectar sugar amount, caloric value of nectar and pollen amount delivered daily by G. phaeum plant (n=5) in 2015, Lublin, SE Poland. Vertical whiskers show SD

Nectar and pollen reward of Geranium phaeum available to flower visitors in 2015–2016, Lublin, SE Poland

YearNectar amount · flower−1 (mg)*Nectar sugar concentration (% w/w)*Nectar sugar amount:*Caloric value of nectar · m−2 of patch (cal)Pollen amount:


flower−1 (mg)m−2 of patch (g)flower−1 (mg)m−2 of patch (g)
20151.6b ± 1.3 (14)36.6b ± 11.2 (14)0.5b ± 0.3 (14)1.0b ± 0.4 (11)4.0b ± 1.6 (11)2.0a ± 0.1 (6)4.0a ± 1.5 (11)
20162.9a ± 1.0 (16)53.1a ± 7.4 (16)1.6a ± 0.6 (16)2.5a ± 0.3 (11)9.9a ± 2.0 (11)1.7b ± 0.2 (6)2.7b ± 0.6 (11)
mean2.3 ± 1.4 (30)45.4 ± 12.5 (30)1.1 ± 0.7 (30)1.7 ± 0.9 (22)6.9 ± 3.5 (22)1.9 ± 0.2 (12)3.4 ± 1.3 (22)

Time and abundance of flowering of Geranium phaeum in the years of study, Lublin SE Poland

YearFlowering period (days)No. of flowering stems · m−2 of a patch*No. of flowers:*

flowering stem−1m−2 of a patch (thous.)
201527 April–8 June (43)120.6a ± 42.1 (11)16.5b ± 4.7 (113)2.0a ± 0.8 (11)
201629 April–31 May (33)65.3b ± 12.8 (11)21.3a ± 7.1 (140)1.6a ± 0.3 (11)
mean(38)92.9 ± 41.5 (22)19.2 ± 6.6 (253)1.8 ± 0.6 (22)
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jas-2021-0024 | Journal eISSN: 2299-4831 | Journal ISSN: 1643-4439
Language: English
Page range: 331 - 343
Submitted on: Jul 26, 2021
Accepted on: Oct 1, 2021
Published on: Dec 28, 2021
Published by: Research Institute of Horticulture
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2021 Marzena Masierowska, published by Research Institute of Horticulture
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.