References
- Alwin, D.F., and Hauser, R.M., 1975. The decomposition of effects in path analysis. American sociological review, pp. 37-47.
- Baker, J. W., and Allin Cornell, C., 2005. A vector-valued ground motion intensity measure consisting of spectral acceleration and epsilon. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 34(10), pp. 1193-1217.
- Bentler, P. M. 1990. Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological bulletin, 107(2), 238.
- Berry, M., Parrish, M., and Eberhard, M., 2004. PEER Structural Performance Database, User’s Manual (Version 1.0). University of California, Berkeley.
- Browne, M. W., and Cudeck, R. 1993. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sage focus editions, 154, pp. 136-136.
- Celik, OC., and Ellingwood, BR., 2010. Seismic fragilities for non-ductile reinforced concrete frames–Role of aleatoric and epistemic uncertainties. Structural Safety, 32, pp. 1-12
- Choi, E., DesRoches, R., and Nielson, B., 2004. Seismic fragility of typical bridges in moderate seismic zones. Engineering Structures, 26, pp. 187-199.
- Cornell, CA. and Krawinkler, H., 2000. Progress and challenges in seismic performance assessment. PEER center news, 3, pp. 1-3.
- DesRoches, R., Padgett, J., Ramanathan, K. and Dukes, J. 2012. Feasibility studies for improving Caltrans bridge fragility relationships No. CA12-1775.
- Jeong, S-H., and Elnashai, AS., 2007. Probabilistic fragility analysis parameterized by fundamental response quantities. Engineering Structures, 29, pp. 1238-1251.
- Kennedy, R. P., and Ravindra, M. K., 1984. Seismic fragilities for nuclear power plant risk studies. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 79(1), pp. 47-68.
- Kircher, C. A., Whitman, R. V. and Holmes, W. T., 2006. HAZUS earthquake loss estimation methods. Natural Hazards Review, 7(2), pp. 45-59.
- Land, K. C. 1969. Principles of path analysis. Sociological methodology, 1: 3-37.
- Luco N., and Cornell, CA., 2007. Structure-specific scalar intensity measures for near-source and ordinary earthquake ground motions. Earthquake Spectra, 23, pp. 357-392.
- Mackie, K., and Stojadinovic, B., 2004. Improving probabilistic seismic demand models through refined intensity measures. In: Proc. 13th World Conf. Earthquake Eng. Int. Assoc. for Earthquake Eng. Japan, August 2004.
- Mackie, KR., and Stojadinovic, B., 2005. Fragility basis for California highway overpass bridge seismic decision making. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, College of Engineering, University of California, Berkeley.
- Kadysiewski, S. and Mosalam, K.M., 2009. Modeling of unreinforced masonry infill walls considering in-plane and outof-plane interaction (Vol. 70). Berkeley, California, USA: Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center.
- McKay, MD., Beckman, RJ. and Conover, WJ., 2000. A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code. Technometrics, 42, pp. 55-61.
- Megally, S., Veletzos, MJ., Burnell, K., Restrepo, JI. and Seible, F., 2009. Seismic performance of precast concrete segmental bridges: Summary of experimental research on segment-to-segment joints. PCI journal, 54(2).
- Nielson, B. G., 2005. Analytical fragility curves for highway bridges in moderate seismic zones. PhD Thesis., Georgia Institute of Technology,
- Padgett, JE., Nielson, BG. and DesRoches, R. 2008. Selection of optimal intensity measures in probabilistic seismic demand models of highway bridge portfolios. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 37, pp. 711-725.
- Pedhazur, E. J., and Pedhazur Schmelkin, L. 1991. Exploratory factor analysis. Measurement, design and analysis: An integrated approach, pp. 590-630.
- Priestley, MN, Seible, F., and Calvi, GM., 1996. Seismic design and retrofit of bridges. John Wiley & Sons.
- Ramanathan, K., DesRoches, R., and Padgett, J., 2010. Analytical fragility curves for multispan continuous steel girder bridges in moderate seismic zones. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, pp. 173-182.
- Ramanathan, K., Padgett, JE., and DesRoches, R., 2015. Temporal evolution of seismic fragility curves for concrete box-girder bridges in California. Engineering Structures, 97, pp. 29-46.
- Scharge, L., 1981. Anchoring of bearings by friction, joint sealing and bearing systems for concrete structures. In: World congress on joints and bearings (Vol. 1).
- Shamsabadi, A., Yan, L. 2008. Closed-form force-displacement backbone curves for bridge abutment-backfill systems. In: Geotechnical Earthquake. Engineering and Soil Dynamics, IV: pp. 1-10.
- Shome, N., 1999. Probabilistic seismic demand analysis of nonlinear structures. Stanford University.
- Singhal, A., and Kiremidjian, A. S., 1996. Method for probabilistic evaluation of seismic structural damage. Journal of Structural Engineering, 122(12), pp. 1459-1467.
- Straub, D., and Der Kiureghian, A., 2008. Improved seismic fragility modeling from empirical data. Structural safety, 30(4): pp. 320-336.
- Wright, S., 1921. Correlation and causation. Journal of agricultural research, 20(7), pp. 557-585.