Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Multi-Horizon Feature Reconstruction for 3D Salient Object Detection Cover

Multi-Horizon Feature Reconstruction for 3D Salient Object Detection

Open Access
|Sep 2026

Figures & Tables

Figure 1:

The demonstration of multi-horizon-attention and feature optimization using muti-scaled, multi-resolution, multi-stage color, depth, and common modality-based features. (A) Image. (B) Depth. (C) Ground-truth. (D) Our.

Figure 2:

The left part shows the architecture of the proposed model. First, the model extracts features from the RGB image and depth map. While extracting the complementary features, the RGB FAO. Then these cross-model features are fused in a MFR. Finally, the outputs of these MFR modules are fed to a SAM in four steps to obtain the final saliency map. FAO, feature aggregation and optimization; MFR, multi-horizon feature reconstruction; SAM, self-aggregation module.

Figure 3:

Stage-wise optimization of extracted features has visualized the reconstruction of visual salient points in the low-depth images to predict the salient objects accurately.

Table 1:

The quantitative comparison of the proposed model on six benchmark RGBD datasets with four recent evaluation parameters.

Date-SetMetricOURImproving [53]CATNet [54]FCN [37]AirSod [25]MAD [55]DCMF [56]GCFNET [22]HIFN [50]CAS-GNN [29]cmMS [33]CoNet [51]D3Net [20]CPFP [15]TANet [57]PCFNET [52]CTMF [27]AFNet [26]DF [13]
NJUD [6]0.9450.9400.9290.9180.9180.9030.8880.9150.9150.8930.9140.8720.9000.8770.8740.8720.8450.7750.804
0.9410.9260.9370.9180.9080.9210.9130.9140.9120.9110.9000.8940.9000.8790.8780.8770.8490.7720.763
0.9690.9590.9330.9530.9440.9300.9250.9470.9440.9220.9140.9120.9500.9260.9250.9240.9130.8530.864
MAE0.0240.0260.0250.0390.0340.0370.0430.0380.0380.0360.0440.0470.0410.0530.0600.0590.0850.1000.141
NLPR [46]0.9280.9340.9160.9110.9230.9010.8750.9070.9150.8880.9130.8500.8970.8670.8630.8410.8250.7710.778
0.9490.9320.9390.9240.9080.9330.9220.9190.9240.9190.8990.9070.9120.8880.8860.8740.8600.7990.802
0.9660.9660.9680.9600.9630.9550.9400.9530.9600.9510.9450.9360.9530.9320.9410.9250.9290.8790.880
MAE0.0190.0190.0180.0240.0390.0220.0290.0250.9240.0250.0270.0310.0300.0360.0410.0440.0560.0580.085
STEREO [47]0.9450.9330.9020.9060.9000.8920.8720.9000.9060.8760.9080.8850.8910.8710.8610.8600.8310.8230.757
0.9330.9220.9250.9060.8950.9100.9030.8990.9070.8990.8890.9080.8990.8790.8740.8750.8480.8250.757
0.9670.9530.9350.9470.9390.9390.9300.9400.9440.9290.9220.9220.9380.9250.9230.9250.9120.8870.847
MAE0.0310.0260.0300.0320.0430.0370.0430.0400.0400.0390.0420.0410.0460.0510.0600.0640.0860.0750.141
SSD [48]0.8890.861---0.850--0.8700.8400.8650.8060.8340.7660.8100.8070.7290.6870.735
0.8870.871---0.872--0.8750.8720.8740.8530.8570.8070.8390.8410.7760.7110.747
0.9400.917---0.907--0.9170.9150.9110.8960.9100.8520.8970.8940.8650.8070.828
MAE0.0420.045---0.045--0.0450.0470.0520.0590.0580.0820.0630.0620.0990.1180.142
LFSD [49]0.9190.8570.8840.876-0.8620.7710.7710.8490.8320.8880.8480.8100.8260.7960.7750.7870.7440.813
0.9090.8210.8940.875-0.8670.8790.8460.8450.8460.8460.8620.8250.8280.8010.7860.7880.7380.783
0.9300.8490.9080.913-0.9010.8420.8830.9070.8770.8910.8970.8620.8720.8470.8270.8570.8150.857
MAE0.0410.0960.0510.061-0.0590.0680.0790.0700.0740.720.0710.0950.0880.1110.1190.1270.1330.145
DUT-RGBD [5]0.9600.8590.9510.9310.920-0.9280.9230.9130.9120.9320.9080.8670.7950.7900.7710.8230.6590.744
0.9570.8410.9530.9240.891-0.9200.9180.9020.8910.8850.9180.8820.8180.8080.8010.8310.7620.705
0.9770.8790.9710.9560.946-0.9500.9510.9290.9320.9400.9410.8890.8590.8610.8560.8990.7960.823
MAE0.0200.0710.0200.0320.048-0.0430.0400.0410.0430.0360.0340.0610.0760.0930.1000.0970.1220.145

[i] MAE, mean absolute error.

Table 2:

Illustration of the contribution of optimization of each component of the proposed model.

SettingSTEREO [47]NJU2K [6]LFSD [49]
BASE MODELLow-depthissuesOURMFRSAMFβSαEψMAE↓FβSαEψMAE↓FβSαEψMAE↓
0.80380.80640.85720.08940.75590.77660.77030.10030.70950.71050.70900.1963
0.81520.83340.84420.08400.78890.86900.80880.09000.72450.75050.75900.1083
0.84810.84520.85550.07520.82450.84890.85050.07620.83350.84520.85800.0882
0.85820.86090.87810.06510.87720.87780.87800.06100.86760.85900.87750.0790
0.94560.93340.96740.03100.94560.94140.96980.02450.91970.90970.93700.0411

[i] MAE, mean absolute error; MFR, multi-horizon feature reconstruction; SAM, self-aggregation module.

Figure 4:

The saliency maps is shown here for the visual demonstration (A) input RGB image, (B) depth image, (C) GT image, (D) OUR, (E) HAIN, (F) CAS−GNN, (G) cmMS, (H) CoNet, (I) D3NET, (J) CPSF, (K) TANet, (L) PCFNET, (M) CTMFR, and (N) AFNet of proposed model. GT, ground truth.

Figure 5:

Comparison of our proposed model with recent models with (A) PR-curve (B) F-measure (vertical axis (thresholds) and horizontal axis) datasets (1) STERE (2) LFSD dataset, respectively.

Language: English
Submitted on: May 19, 2026
Published on: Sep 4, 2026
Published by: International Journal on Smart Sensing and Intelligent Systems
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2026 Surya Kant Singh, Vivek Kumar Srivastav, Rajeev Srivastava, published by International Journal on Smart Sensing and Intelligent Systems
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.