Figure 1.

Figure 2:

Figure 3:

Crop Disease Detection Using Simulated Data
|
Comparative study of crop disease detection methods
| Study | Model used | Dataset type | Accuracy (%) | Mobile deployment suitability |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [35] | Deep CNN | Image-based | 96.8 | Low |
| [36] | CNN + Mobile App | Image-based | 94.5 | Medium |
| [37] | Enhanced CNN | Image-based | 97.2 | Medium |
| Proposed method | Lightweight CNN | Simulation-based | 87.5 | High |
CNN model
| Evaluation metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Loss | 0.2279 |
| Accuracy | 0.875 |
RF classifier
| Class | Precision | Recall | F1-score | Support |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 (No disease) | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 89 |
| 1 (disease) | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 111 |
| Accuracy | 1.00 | 200 | ||
| Macro avg | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 200 |
| Weighted avg | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 200 |
Data head
| Soil health | Weather conditions | Plant health | Disease label |
|---|---|---|---|
| 51 | 56 | 62 | 0 |
| 92 | 16 | 85 | 0 |
| 14 | 85 | 1 | 1 |
| 71 | 89 | 87 | 0 |
| 60 | 43 | 71 | 0 |
SVM
| Class | Precision | Recall | F1-score | Support |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 (No disease) | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 89 |
| 1 (Disease) | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 111 |
| Accuracy | 1.00 | 200 | ||
| Macro avg | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 200 |
| Weighted avg | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 200 |