Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Squeeze-ICNN architecture for cardiovascular disease detection using ECG image: training of shape, deep, and LGXP feature extractors Cover

Squeeze-ICNN architecture for cardiovascular disease detection using ECG image: training of shape, deep, and LGXP feature extractors

Open Access
|Jan 2026

Figures & Tables

Figure 1:

Basic structure of the suggested mechanism for CVD. CVD, cardiovascular disease; ICNN, improved convolutional neural network.
Basic structure of the suggested mechanism for CVD. CVD, cardiovascular disease; ICNN, improved convolutional neural network.

Figure 2:

Neighborhood diagram of improved hierarchy of skeleton feature.
Neighborhood diagram of improved hierarchy of skeleton feature.

Figure 3:

Architecture of classification process. CNN, convolutional neural network.
Architecture of classification process. CNN, convolutional neural network.

Figure 4:

SqueezeNet model.
SqueezeNet model.

Figure 5:

Conventional CNN model. CNN, convolutional neural network.
Conventional CNN model. CNN, convolutional neural network.

Figure 6:

Architecture of ICNN model. ICNN, improved convolutional neural network.
Architecture of ICNN model. ICNN, improved convolutional neural network.

Figure 7:

Sample images (A) Normal person ECG images (B) ECG images of MI patients (C) ECG images of patient that have abnormal heartbeat (D) ECG images of patient that have history of MI. MI, myocardial infarction.
Sample images (A) Normal person ECG images (B) ECG images of MI patients (C) ECG images of patient that have abnormal heartbeat (D) ECG images of patient that have history of MI. MI, myocardial infarction.

Figure 8:

Images for CVD detection using ECG signal (A) Original images, (B) Gaussian filtering, (C) Mean filtering, (D) Wiener filtering, (E) Conventional median filtering, and (F) Improved median filtering. CVD, cardiovascular disease.
Images for CVD detection using ECG signal (A) Original images, (B) Gaussian filtering, (C) Mean filtering, (D) Wiener filtering, (E) Conventional median filtering, and (F) Improved median filtering. CVD, cardiovascular disease.

Figure 9:

Comparative analysis on positive metrics for Squeeze-ICNN and traditional schemes. CNN, convolutional neural network; DCNN, deep convolutional neural network; DNN, deep neural network; ICNN, improved convolutional neural network.
Comparative analysis on positive metrics for Squeeze-ICNN and traditional schemes. CNN, convolutional neural network; DCNN, deep convolutional neural network; DNN, deep neural network; ICNN, improved convolutional neural network.

Figure 10:

Comparative analysis on negative metrics for Squeeze-ICNN and traditional schemes. CNN, convolutional neural network; DCNN, deep convolutional neural network; DNN, deep neural network; ICNN, improved convolutional neural network.
Comparative analysis on negative metrics for Squeeze-ICNN and traditional schemes. CNN, convolutional neural network; DCNN, deep convolutional neural network; DNN, deep neural network; ICNN, improved convolutional neural network.

Figure 11:

Comparative analysis on other metrics for Squeeze-ICNN and traditional schemes. CNN, convolutional neural network; DCNN, deep convolutional neural network; DNN, deep neural network; ICNN, improved convolutional neural network.
Comparative analysis on other metrics for Squeeze-ICNN and traditional schemes. CNN, convolutional neural network; DCNN, deep convolutional neural network; DNN, deep neural network; ICNN, improved convolutional neural network.

Features and challenges on existing works

Author & yearPreprocessing methodFeature extraction typeModel typeAccuracy/precision/F1Limitations
Khan et al. [1]Not specifiedRaw ECG imagesDNN (SSD MobileNet)Accuracy: 98%Low scalability to noisy datasets
Fatema et al. [2]Basic denoisingDeep features (InceptionV3 + ResNet50)Hybrid DLNot specifiedDataset imbalance, limited filtering
Li et al. [3]Standard augmentationDeep features + TLDeepECG (InceptionV3)Precision: 98.56%Limited raw ECG format handling
Song et al. [4]2D signal representationRegion-based waveform featuresFaster R-CNNAccuracy: 98.94%Incomplete beat/lead recognition
Kilimci et al. [5]Image resizingVision transformer embeddingsTransformer modelsHigh (exact not listed)Complex, not edge-friendly
Sadad et al. [6]Basic filteringCNN + attention featuresLightweight CNN + IoTHigh (not specified)Weak segmentation, dataset-dependent
Sherly & Mathivanan [7]DCT + FourierClinical + image featuresHybrid CNN + AOAHigher accuracy (est.)Optimization lacks generalization
El-Habibi [8]Not specifiedDeep featuresCNNHigh (train/val accuracy)Overfitting risk
Proposed (This Study)IMFLGXP + improved skeleton + ResNet/VGG/inceptionHybrid (SqueezeNet + ICNN)Accuracy: 95.6%Superior in preprocessing, hybrid design, and feature fusion
Precision: 97.9%
FNR: 5.1%

Comparative assessment on positive metric

ModelAccuracy (%)Precision (%)Recall/sensitivity (%)F1-score (%)
CNN (baseline)88.086.584.385.4
ICNN (proposed)91.292.490.191.2
SqueezeNet90.691.189.390.2
Squeeze-ICNN94.497.994.996.4

j_ijssis-2026-0004_tab_007

AbbreviationDescription
ACAccuracy
AUCArea Under the Curve
BGRUBidirectional Gated Recurrent Unit
Bi-GRUBidirectional Gated Recurrent Unit
CDCCenters for Disease Control and Prevention
CHSComb Hyper-Sine
CNNConvolutional Neural Network
CVDCardiovascular Disease
DCNNDeep Convolutional Neural Network
DCTDiscrete Cosine Transform
DLDeep Learning
DNNDeep Neural Network
DSRDynamic Source Routing
ECGElectrocardiogram
EMDEmpirical Mode Decomposition
EMGElectromyography
EPSEpisodes per Second
ETTExercise Tolerance Test
FFTFast Fourier Transform
FNFalse Negative
FPRsFalse Positive Rates
ICNNImproved Convolutional Neural Network
IoTInternet of Things
LBPLocal Binary Pattern
LGXORLocal Gabor XOR Pattern
LSTMLong Short-Term Memory
LXPLocal XOR Pattern
MCCMatthews Correlation Coefficient
NPVNegative Predictive Value
MIMyocardial Infarction
MLMachine Learning
NNNeural Network
PSNRPeak Signal-to-Noise Ratio
QRSQRS Complex
R-CNNRegion-Based Convolutional Neural Network
RELRouting by Energy and Link Quality
ReLURectified Linear Unit
SSDSingle Shoot Detection
SSIMStructural Similarity Index Measure
STST Segment
SVM-RFECVSupport Vector Machine with Recursive Feature Elimination and Cross-Validation
TLTransfer Learning
VGGVisual Geometry Group
WHOWorld Health Organization
XORExclusive OR

Statistical assessment on accuracy

Statistical metricsLSTMDCNNSqueezeNetCNN [8]DenseNetBi-GRUDNN [1]Squeeze-ICNN
Mean0.7960.8100.8640.7980.8410.8020.8060.926
Minimum0.7550.7340.8160.7500.7850.7740.7470.882
Standard deviation0.0420.0440.0320.0320.0490.0260.0450.028
Median0.7850.8340.8680.8010.8290.7970.8080.934
Maximum0.8600.8390.9030.8390.9190.8390.8600.956

Comparative overview of the proposed method vs existing studies

Study/yearPreprocessing techniqueFeature typeModel usedAccuracy (%)Key advantagesLimitations
Khan et al. [1]Not specifiedRaw ECG ImagesMobileNet-based DNN92Lightweight architectureLimited generalization, no hybrid features
Fatema et al. [2]Basic filteringDeep features (CNN)InceptionV3 + ResNet50~90Combined model improved feature learningImbalanced dataset, minimal filtering
Li et al. [3]Data augmentationTL (inceptionV3)DeepECG91–93Pretrained on large ECG datasetsDataset-specific architecture
Sadad et al. [6]Basic filteringCNN + attentionLightweight CNN89–91IoT compatible, efficientLacked multi-feature fusion
Proposed (This Study)IMFHybrid: Deep + LGXP + shapeSqueezeNet + ICNN95.6Low FNR (5.1%), robust features, compact sizeLimited dataset, needs cross-validation

Analysis on PSNR and SSIM

MethodsPSNRSSIM
Mean filter23.5860.770
Gaussian filter22.1360.707
Weiner filter19.9970.696
Conventional median filter30.6560.877
IMF37.8040.915

Ablation assessment on Squeeze-ICNN, model with conventional preprocessing, model with conventional hierarchy of skeleton, and SqueezeNet + Conventional CNN

MetricsModel with conventional preprocessingSqueeze-ICNNSqueezeNet + conventional CNNModel with conventional hierarchy of skeleton
Sensitivity0.7850.9490.8360.788
F-measure0.7850.9640.8360.788
Accuracy0.8510.9440.9080.852
FPR0.1270.0780.0680.126
Specificity0.8730.9220.9320.874
FNR0.2150.0510.1640.212
NPV0.8730.8300.9320.874
Precision0.7850.9790.8360.788
MCC0.7410.8390.7880.745
Language: English
Submitted on: Jun 19, 2025
|
Published on: Jan 30, 2026
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2026 Thoutireddy Shilpa, T. Priyanka, published by Professor Subhas Chandra Mukhopadhyay
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.