Figure 1:

Figure 2:

Figure 3:

Figure 4:

Figure 5:

Figure 6:

Figure 7:

Figure 8:

Comparison with state-of-the-art methods
| Methods | Accuracy (%) |
|---|---|
| Proposed method | 98.53 |
| FCM [20] | 91.29 |
| PCAKM [20] | 90.45 |
| MRFFCM [20] | 91.27 |
| NR-ELM [21] | 88.93 |
| DBN [21] | 87.22 |








| Methods | Accuracy (%) |
|---|---|
| Proposed method | 98.53 |
| FCM [20] | 91.29 |
| PCAKM [20] | 90.45 |
| MRFFCM [20] | 91.27 |
| NR-ELM [21] | 88.93 |
| DBN [21] | 87.22 |
© 2025 Tushar Zanke, Stuti Jagtap, Samrudhi Wath, Snehashish Mulgir, Archana Chaudhari, published by Professor Subhas Chandra Mukhopadhyay
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.