Figure 1:
Figure 2:
Figure 3:
Figure 4:
Figure 5:
Performance comparison of the proposed energy-aware Q-learning-based routing algorithm with Q-learning-based routing_
| Number of nodes | PLR | PDR | Throughput | Networks Lifetime | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q-learning | Proposed energy-aware Q-learning | Q-learning | Proposed energy-aware Q-learning | Q-learning | Proposed energy-aware Q-learning | Q-learning | Proposed energy-aware Q-learning | |
| 20 | 0.3 | 0.58 | 0.7 | 0.42 | 0.175 | 21 | 0.2674 | 0.358 |
| 30 | 0.28 | 0.76 | 0.71 | 0.44 | 20.75 | 22 | 0.3155 | 0.344 |
| 40 | 0.28 | 0.51 | 0.725 | 0.49 | 23.25 | 25 | 0.3439 | 0.33 |
| 50 | 0.275 | 0.42 | 0.725 | 0.58 | 36.25 | 37 | 0.46233 | 0.33 |
| 60 | 0.17 | 0.01 | 0.725 | 0.99 | 41.35 | 49.5 | 0.5965 | 0.978 |
| 70 | 0.13 | 0.01 | 0.87 | 0.99 | 43.5 | 49.5 | 0.6865 | 1.29 |
| 80 | 0.13 | 0.01 | 0.87 | 0.99 | 43.5 | 49.5 | 0.8072 | 1.43 |
| 90 | 0.13 | 0.01 | 0.87 | 0.99 | 43.5 | 49.5 | 0.9189 | 1.47 |
| 100 | 0.13 | 0.01 | 0.87 | 0.99 | 43.5 | 49.5 | 1.032 | 1.596 |