Have a personal or library account? Click to login
M&A motives in the German SME sector: The perception of M&A advisors Cover

M&A motives in the German SME sector: The perception of M&A advisors

Open Access
|Dec 2025

Figures & Tables

Figure 1

Number of M&A transactions involving SME supported by an advisor.
Number of M&A transactions involving SME supported by an advisor.

Figure 2

Side supported in M&A transactions.
Side supported in M&A transactions.

Figure 3

The number of M&A transactions where the targets were family businesses.
The number of M&A transactions where the targets were family businesses.

Figure 4

Motives for selling SME.
Motives for selling SME.

Figure 5

Entities acting as prospective buyers in the SME takeover.
Entities acting as prospective buyers in the SME takeover.

Figure 6

Number of M&A transactions with prospective buyers of SME from abroad.
Number of M&A transactions with prospective buyers of SME from abroad.

Figure 7

The role that buyer motives play in SME acquisitions.
The role that buyer motives play in SME acquisitions.

Figure 8

Relevance of the challenges in the SME sector.
Relevance of the challenges in the SME sector.

Shares of sectors in the total value added (at factor cost) by SME_

Total value added by SMEManufacturingConstructionTradeServices
Yearmln EURmln EUR%mln EUR%mln EUR%mln EUR%
20201,312,594160,35619116,63314188,75722346,01541
2022853,487174,67118129,89414218,95423380,56740

Literature review on M&A motives in the SME sector_

Authors (year)Country, research method of data collection, sample, year of the studyTopicFindings (relevant to this study)
Hirigoyen and Basly (2019)France, questionnaire survey, 69 responses, 2012Factors that influence family business sale decisions in the context of the 2008 crisisMotives for exit/selling
  • Lack of successors (MNG)

  • Non-viability of the business (MNG)

  • Benefit from an attractive offer (F)

  • Industry concentration (S)

  • Conflicts between active and non-active family members (MNG)

Becker et al. (2016)Germany, 34 semi-structured interviews with owners and managers, 2012Various aspects of M&A transactions carried out by the German Mittelstand (including SME)Motives for M&A
  • Growth (S)

  • Extend product portfolio (M/M)

  • Improve competitive position (S)

  • Access to customers (M/M)

  • Expand capacity (T/O)

  • Customer requirements (M/M)

  • Synergy (S)

  • Access to know-how/technology (T/O)

  • Achieving critical operating size (T/O)

  • Risk diversification (F)

Parastuty et al. (2016)Austria, questionnaire survey among 212 entrepreneurs (41 exited their firms), 38 responses, 2009–2013Motives for entrepreneurial exit among young firmsMotives for exit/selling
  • Another attractive activity/job or business opportunity (S)

  • Problems with low demand and sales (M/M)

  • Extreme competition (S)

  • Failed to meet the expectations (M/M)

  • Product/service exists in the market (M/M)

  • Prevent more significant losses (F)

  • Difficulties in acquiring resources (S)

  • Need for more capital (F)

  • Family issues, illness (MNG)

  • Conflicts, internal or external (MNG)

  • Bankruptcy (F)

Arvanitis and Stucki (2014)Switzerland, questionnaire survey, 405 responses, 2011Firm characteristics that determine the innovation and economic performance of M&AMotives for M&A
  • Increase market share (M/M)

  • Access networks (M/M)

  • Lower average fixed costs (F)

  • Entry into new businesses (S)

  • Rationalisation of marketing and sales (M/M)

  • Rationalisation of procurement (F)

  • Broaden the product mix (M/M)

  • Rationalisation of production (T/O)

  • Spread the market risk (M/M)

  • Obtain access to specific and innovation-related know-how (S)

Steen et al. (2014)Australia, five semi-structured interviews with CEOs of microcap firms with M&A experience, 2014M&A experience of microcap businesses: determinants of success, pitfalls and problems with integrationMotives for buying
  • Add complementary products/services (M/M)

  • Achieve financial and operating synergies (F, O/T)

  • Geographic expansion (M/M)

  • Acquisition of intellectual property (S)

Nisar et al. (2012)Norway, questionnaire survey among upper-level managers of multinational SME 53 responses, 2009Motives behind the equity modes of foreign market entry, including cross-border M&A of SMEMotives for (cross-border) M&A
  • Reduce transaction cost (F)

  • Access to management know-how (MNG)

  • Reduce the risk of the exchange rate (F)

  • Access to advanced technology

  • Gain revenue/profit enhancement (F)

  • Access to natural resources (S)

  • Reduce competition (S)

  • Level of management control (MNG)

  • Cultural similarity (MNG)

  • Research and development intensity (T/O)

  • Enable product diversification (M/M)

  • Reduce cost by globalised supply chains (F)

  • Facilitate international expansion (M/M)

Harada (2007)Japan, secondary data from the survey implemented by the Japan SME Corporation in November 2003, 1,743 observations, 2005Exit and post-exit behaviour of small firms and their managersMotives for exit/selling
  • Despairing perception for further business: decline of sales or orders (M/M); having a deficit, bankruptcy of the client company, rejection or reduction of the loan by the financial institution (F)

  • Ageing of the manager (MNG)

  • Illness or injury of the manager (MNG)

  • Diminished motivation for the business (MNG)

  • Take a new job or start up a new business (S)

Mickelson and Worley (2003)The United States/Canada, 12 semi-structured interviews with key persons from both the buyer and seller sides, 1997Critical differences between typical M&A and those involving a family firm (the acquisition of a family business by a larger company)Motives for buying
  • Growth through new markets/products (M/M)

  • Form a new strategic business unit (S)

  • Achieve synergies between companies (O/T)

  • Motives for exit/selling

  • Other life goals, lack of internal succession, increase in family harmony (MNG)

  • Realising financial goals (F)

Ronstadt (1986)The US questionnaire survey among ex-entrepreneurs 95 responses, 1982Motives for the entrepreneurial exit, exit mode (e.g., selling out or liquidation), and timingMotives for exit/selling
  • Financial motives (F)

  • Personal and family motives (MNG)

  • Environmental and venture-related motives: idea/concept (S)

  • Legal problems, competition, market decline, other opportunities (M/M)

  • Fire, real estate/site problems (T/O)

Statistical comparison of M&A motive frequencies across advisor groups_

Grouping variableStatistical testSellers’ motivesBuyers’ motives
Experience in SME M&A (greater/lower) U Mann–WhitneyNo statistically significant differences between groupsNo statistically significant differences between groups
Experience in supporting family firms (greater/lower) U Mann–WhitneyNo significant differences between groupsAdvisors with greater experience perceived growth as a less important motive (p-value = 0.047)
Side supported in M&A transactions (buyer/seller/both)Kruskal–WallisAdvisors supporting the buyer side perceive reorientation of the owners as a more frequent motive (p-value = 0.018)No significant differences between groups
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ijme-2025-0022 | Journal eISSN: 2543-5361 | Journal ISSN: 2299-9701
Language: English
Page range: 13 - 25
Submitted on: Aug 29, 2024
|
Accepted on: Aug 21, 2025
|
Published on: Dec 30, 2025
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2025 Anna Blajer-Gołębiewska, Magdalena Markiewicz, Heike Stolte, published by Warsaw School of Economics
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.