Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Initial public offerings of foreign companies on stock markets in Europe – an institutional perspective Cover

Initial public offerings of foreign companies on stock markets in Europe – an institutional perspective

Open Access
|Dec 2024

References

  1. Álvarez-Otero, S. (2022), A European empirical study of institutional differences in IPOs anomalies, Journal of Risk and Financial Management, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 8. doi: 10.3390/jrfm16010008
  2. Angelini, E., Foglia, M. (2018), The relationship between IPO and macroeconomics factors: an empirical analysis from UK market, Annals of Economics and Finance, Vol. 19, No. 1, pp. 319–336.
  3. Bai, M. (2022), An empirical study on the relationship between stock price information and enterprise innovation management based on information learning mechanism, Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, Vol. 2022, pp. 1–10. doi: 10.1155/2022/9425405
  4. Bhullar, P.S., Sahoo, S. (2023), Macroeconomic variables and IPO activities: an empirical investigation in Indian market, International Journal of Sustainable Economy, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 1. doi: 10.1504/ijse.2023.10044243
  5. Bonardo, D., Paleari, S., Vismara, S. (2011), Valuing university–based firms: the effects of academic affiliation on IPO performance, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Vol. 35, No. 4, pp. 755–776. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00369.x
  6. Bongini, P., Ferrando, A., Rossi, E., Rossolini, M. (2019), SME access to market-based finance across Eurozone countries, Small Business Economics, Vol. 56, No. 4, pp. 1667–1697. doi: 10.1007/s11187-019-00285-z
  7. Bruno, V., Claessens, S. (2010), Corporate governance and regulation: can there be too much of a good thing? Journal of Financial Intermediation, Vol. 19, No. 4, pp. 461–482. doi: 10.1016/j.jfi.2009.10.001
  8. Bruton, G.D., Ahlstrom, D., Li, H. (2010), Institutional theory and entrepreneurship: where are we now and where do we need to move in the future? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Vol. 34, No. 3, pp. 421–440. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00390.x
  9. Caglio, C., Hanley, K.W., Marietta-Westberg, J. (2016), Going public abroad, Journal of Corporate Finance, Vol. 41, pp. 103–122. doi: 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2016.07.004
  10. Cai, K., Zhu, H. (2020), Does going public in the U.S. facilitate corporate innovation of foreign firms? The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Vol. 52, pp. 101107. doi: 10.1016/j.najef.2019.101107
  11. Chemmanur, T.J., Gupta, M., Simonyan, K. (2020), Top management team quality and innovation in venture-backed private firms and IPO market rewards to innovative activity, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Vol. 46, No. 4, pp. 920–951. doi: 10.1177/1042258720918827
  12. Chen, Y., Wang, S.S., Tong, W.H., Zhu, H. (2017), Economic freedom and IPO underpricing, Frontiers of Business Research in China, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 11–20. doi: 10.1186/s11782-017-0019-1
  13. Chi, S. (2023), The kite on a string: state power and the Chinese IPO mechanism on the path to liberalization, Asia Pacific Law Review, Vol. 31, No. 2, pp. 308–328. doi: 10.1080/10192557.2023.2181774
  14. Colak, G., Gounopoulos, D., Loukopoulos, P., Loukopoulos, G. (2021), Political power, local policy uncertainty and IPO pricing, Journal of Corporate Finance, Vol. 67, pp. 101907. doi: 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2021.101907
  15. Colombo, M.G., Meoli, M., Vismara, S. (2019), Signaling in science-based IPOs: the combined effect of affiliation with prestigious universities, underwriters, and venture capitalists, Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 34, No. 1, pp. 141–177. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2018.04.009
  16. Cui, N., Xie, P., Jiang, Y., Xu, L. (2021), How home country identity salience affects emerging market companies’ overseas IPO performance: an empirical investigation from China, International Marketing Review, Vol. 38, No. 4, pp. 780–799. doi: 10.1108/imr-02-2019-0066
  17. Demir, E., García-Gómez, C.D., Diez Esteban, J.M., Farinha, J. (2023), How does uncertainty impact IPO activity? International evidence, Finance Research Letters, Vol. 58, pp. 104517. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.4487946
  18. Dicle, M.F., Levendis, J. (2018), IPO activity and market volatility, Journal of Entrepreneurship and Public Policy, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 2–13. doi: 10.1108/jepp-d-17-00017
  19. DiMaggio, P.J., Powell, W.W. (1983), The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields, American Sociological Review, Vol. 48, No. 2, pp. 147. doi: 10.2307/2095101
  20. Dziurski, P., Sopińska, A. (2020), Does industry matter? Drivers and barriers for open innovation in high-tech and non-high-tech industries – evidence from Poland, International Journal of Management and Economics, Vol. 56, No. 4, pp. 307–323. doi: 10.2478/ijme-2020-0024
  21. Fan, J.P., Gu, Q., Yu, X. (2022), Collectivist cultures and the emergence of family firms, The Journal of Law and Economics, Vol. 65, No. S1, pp. 293–325. doi: 10.1086/718853
  22. Filatotchev, I., Bell, R.G., Rasheed, A.A. (2016), Globalization of capital markets: implications for firm strategies, Journal of International Management, Vol. 22, No. 3, pp. 211–221. doi: 10.1016/j.intman.2016.04.001
  23. Filatotchev, I., Piesse, J. (2009), R&D, internationalization and growth of newly listed firms: European evidence, Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 40, No. 8, pp. 1260–1276. doi: 10.1057/jibs.2009.18
  24. Gounopoulos, D., Mazouz, K., Wood, G. (2021), The consequences of political donations for IPO premium and performance, Journal of Corporate Finance, Vol. 67, pp. 101888. doi: 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2021.101888
  25. Gregory, R.P. (2020), Political uncertainty and the US market risk premium, SSRN Electronic Journal, pp. 621–634. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3585738
  26. Gupta, D.R., Veliyath, R., George, R. (2018), Influence of national culture on IPO activity, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 90, pp. 226–246. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.04.023
  27. Gürkaynak, R.S., Karasoy-Can, H.G., Lee, S.S. (2022), Stock market’s assessment of monetary policy transmission: the cash flow effect, The Journal of Finance, Vol. 77, No. 4, pp. 2375–2421. doi: 10.1111/jofi.13163
  28. He, L., Hsin-han Shen, C., Shiu, C.-Y. (2022), Is fair value information fairly priced? Evidence from IPOs in global capital markets, Journal of Banking; Finance, Vol. 135, pp. 106368. doi: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2021.106368
  29. Hearn, B. (2013), The Institutional Determinants of IPO firm prospectus length in a developing context: a research note, Research in International Business and Finance, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp. 52–65. doi: 10.1016/j.ribaf.2012.06.001
  30. Helbing, P., Lucey, B.M. (2024), A success dressed as a failure? Evidence from post‐IPO withdrawal outcomes in Europe, European Financial Management, Vol. 30, No. 5, pp. 2682–2716. doi: 10.1111/eufm.12487
  31. Helbing, P., Lucey, B.M., Vigne, S. (2019), Online appendix: the determinants of IPO withdrawal – evidence from Europe, SSRN Electronic Journal, pp. 415–436. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3335810
  32. Hitt, M.A. (2016), International strategy and institutional environments, Cross Cultural & Strategic Management, Vol. 23, No. 2, pp. 206–215. doi: 10.1108/ccsm-11-2015-0168
  33. Irani, M.V., Pinto, G., Zhang, D. (2023), IPOs on the decline: the role of globalization, SSRN Electronic Journal. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.4570849
  34. Jamaani, F., Alawadhi, A.M. (2023), Inflation and stock market growth: the case of IPO withdrawal, International Journal of Emerging Markets, pp. 1746–8809. doi: 10.1108/ijoem-03-2023-0452
  35. Jannils, Ł (2021), The concept of political instability in economic research, International Journal of Management and Economics, Vol. 57, No. 3, pp. 268–284. doi: 10.2478/ijme-2021-0016
  36. Juchniewicz, M., Łada, M. (2022), Competitive potential vs. the competitive position of the high-tech sector in European Union countries, International Journal of Management and Economics, Vol. 58, No. 4, pp. 371–380. doi: 10.2478/ijme-2022-0031
  37. Kerssenfischer, M. (2019), Information effects of Euro area monetary policy: new evidence from high-frequency futures data, SSRN Electronic Journal. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3368356
  38. Lewellyn, K.B., Bao, S. (2014), A cross-national investigation of IPO activity: the role of formal institutions and national culture, International Business Review, Vol. 23, No. 6, pp. 1167–1178. doi: 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2014.03.010
  39. Marcato, G., Milcheva, S., Zheng, C. (2018), Market integration, country institutions and IPO underpricing, Journal of Corporate Finance, Vol. 53, pp. 87–105. doi: 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2018.10.002
  40. Martonyi, J. (2020), Law and identity in the European integration, Hungarian Yearbook of International Law and European Law, Vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 238–248. doi: 10.5553/hyiel/266627012020008001015
  41. Mäntysaari, P. (2022), Stocks for all: people’s capitalism in the twenty-first century, De Gruyter, Berlin.
  42. Mehmood, W., Mohd-Rashid, R., Ahmad, A.H., Tajuddin, A.H. (2021), IPO initial return in Pakistan: influence of country-level institutional quality, South Asian Journal of Business Studies, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 1–24. doi: 10.1108/sajbs-06-2020-0209
  43. Meluzín, T., Zinecker, M., Balcerzak, A.P., Pietrzak, M.B. (2018), Why do companies stay private? determinants for IPO candidates to consider in Poland and the Czech Republic, Eastern European Economics, Vol. 56, No. 6, pp. 471–503. doi: 10.1080/00128775.2018.1496795
  44. Meluzín, T., Zinecker, M., Balcerzak, A.P., Pietrzak, M.B., Doubravský, K. (2021), Institutional settings and their impact on the IPO activity: an exploratory study based on qualitative modelling, Acta Polytechnica Hungarica, Vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 215–235. doi: 10.12700/aph.18.2.2021.2.12
  45. Miao, Y., Zhu, Y. (2021), The investment valuation of its a checkmate company based on pest analysis and POCD method research, in: Proceedings of the 2021 International Conference on Financial Management and Economic Transition (FMET 2021). doi: 10.2991/aebmr.k.210917.003
  46. Moore, C.B., Bell, R.G., Filatotchev, I. (2010), Institutions and foreign IPO firms: the effects of “home” and “Host” country institutions on performance, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Vol. 34, No. 3, pp. 469–490. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00383.x
  47. Nuhiu, A., Aliu, F., Peci, B. (2022), Assessing the diversification risk of a single equity market: evidence from the largest European stock indexes, International Journal of Management and Economics, Vol. 58, No. 1, pp. 3–16. doi: 10.2478/ijme-2022-0001
  48. Pesaran, M.H., Shin, Y., Smith, R.P. (1999), Pooled mean group estimation of dynamic heterogeneous panels, Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 94, No. 446, pp. 621. doi: 10.2307/2670182
  49. Qin, Y. (2022). Investment potential analysis on Chinese stock market in metaverse-take VR industry as a sample, in: Proceedings of the 2022 7th International Conference on Financial Innovation and Economic Development (ICFIED 2022). doi: 10.2991/aebmr.k.220307.165
  50. Ray, S., Bisbey, J. (2020), Financing infrastructure in Asia through bonds and capital markets, Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development, Vol. 4, No. 1, p. 87. doi: 10.24294/jipd.v4i1.1168
  51. Reddy, N.P., Le, B., Paul, D.L. (2021), Impact of Sarbanes Oxley act on initial public offerings: new evidence from reverse leveraged buyouts, Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, Vol. 21, No. 3, pp. 575–591. doi: 10.1108/jfra-08-2021–0237
  52. Rivas, J.L., Adamuz, M. (2019), Institutions and IPO activity: a multi-country study, Management Research: Journal of the Iberoamerican Academy of Management, Vol. 17, No. 3, pp. 283–303. doi: 10.1108/mrjiam-09-2018-0862
  53. Salerno, D. (2021), How national culture affects IPO decisions? Evidence from Europe and Asia, Journal of Asia Business Studies, Vol. 15, No. 3, pp. 457–483. doi: 10.1108/jabs-06-2020-0218
  54. Serdar, G., Reed, K.K., Harter, D.E. (2024), Uncertainty, political governance, institutional context, and IPO success, Journal of Managerial Issues, Vol. 36, No. 1, pp. 8–30.
  55. Sundarasen, S.D. (2019), Institutional characteristics, signaling variables and IPO initial returns, PSU Research Review, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 29–49. doi: 10.1108/prr-10-2016-0003
  56. Taylor, M.Z., Wilson, S. (2012), Does culture still matter? The effects of individualism on national innovation rates, Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp. 234–247. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2010.10.001
  57. Thanh, B.N. (2020), Macroeconomic uncertainty, the option to wait and IPO issue cycles, Finance Research Letters, Vol. 32, pp. 101100. doi: 10.1016/j.frl.2019.01.012
  58. Tsai, H.-J., Chiang, Y.-M. (2020), Pension policy and the IPO market, Finance Research Letters, Vol. 34, pp. 101257. doi: 10.1016/j.frl.2019.08.005
  59. Tupper, C., Mehta, A. (2023), The role of national context in the relationship between founder CEO and IPO performance, Multinational Business Review, Vol. 31, No. 3, pp. 381–412. doi: 10.1108/mbr-06-2022-0092
  60. Verma, R.K., Bansal, R. (2021), Impact of macroeconomic variables on the performance of Stock Exchange: a systematic review, International Journal of Emerging Markets, Vol. 16, No. 7, pp. 1291–1329. doi: 10.1108/ijoem-11-2019-0993
  61. Wei, K., Xiao, L., Fang, Y., Jiang, C. (2022), What explains Alibaba’s miraculous IPO success on the New York Stock Exchange? Asia Pacific Business Review, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp. 299–322. doi: 10.1080/13602381.2022.2143640
  62. Yang, J., Ma, J., Doty, D.H. (2020), Family involvement, governmental connections, and IPO underpricing of SMEs in China, Family Business Review, Vol. 33, No. 2, pp. 175–193. doi: 10.1177/0894486520905180
  63. Yost, B.P. (2023), Do tax-based proprietary costs discourage public listing? Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 75, No. 2–3, pp. 101553. doi: 10.1016/j.jacceco.2022.101553
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ijme-2025-0003 | Journal eISSN: 2543-5361 | Journal ISSN: 2299-9701
Language: English
Page range: 391 - 403
Submitted on: Jun 8, 2024
|
Accepted on: Dec 11, 2024
|
Published on: Dec 30, 2024
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2024 Sylwia Cieślik, Tomasz Sosnowski, published by Warsaw School of Economics
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.