Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Initial public offerings of foreign companies on stock markets in Europe – an institutional perspective Cover

Initial public offerings of foreign companies on stock markets in Europe – an institutional perspective

Open Access
|Dec 2024

Figures & Tables

Panel unit root test – ADF-Fisher and IPS test results

TestAt levelAt first differenceConclusion
IPSADF-FisherIPSADF-Fisher
SeriesStatisticp-valueStatisticp-valueStatisticp-valueStatisticp-value
Y–3.21880.000633.72540.0007–5.77240.000051.18660.0000I(0)
C0.26400.604113.46740.3360–2.82610.002430.18130.0026I(1)
P1–0.26280.396411.85640.4573–3.75160.000136.14390.0003I(1)
P20.81000.79108.53940.7417–1.75300.039820.24330.0626I(1)
P3–0.56060.287513.71250.3194–3.46170.000333.56020.0008I(1)
E1–2.00710.022423.56360.0233–3.43800.000333.18220.0009I(0)
E2–0.07570.469812.23650.4269–3.30640.000532.21260.0013I(1)
E3–0.64770.258615.93070.1944–5.14930.000046.95090.0000I(1)
S1–1.49060.068018.97890.0890–3.26290.000632.22480.0013I(0)
S2–1.68800.045721.75730.0403–6.55070.000057.06250.0000I(0)
S30.86910.80768.25760.7647–1.33290.091320.92080.0516I(1)
T1–1.08990.137920.32020.0613–2.42740.007628.60910.0045I(1)/I(0)
T21.31700.90614.53130.9718–1.69030.045522.21440.0352I(1)

Variable definitions and data sources

GroupFactorCodeDescriptionSource
PoliticalGovernment spendingP1The average total government spending at all levels as a percentage of GDP for the most recent 3 years.Heritage Foundation
Government integrityP2The score for this aspect is calculated by taking the average of scores across three sub-factors of equal weight: 1. Perceptions of corruption, 2. Risk of bribery, and 3. Control of corruption, including “capture” of the state by elites and private interests.Heritage Foundation
Image abroad or brandingP3Survey data collected from mid- and upper-level managers. The respondents were asked to rate their agreement with the statement “The country’s image abroad encourages business development” on a scale of 1 (strongly disagree) to 6 (strongly agree).IMD
EconomicTax burdenE1Considers three equally weighted sub-factors: 1. The top marginal tax rate on individual income, 2. The top marginal tax rate on corporate income, and 3. The total tax burden as a percentage of GDP.Heritage Foundation
GDPE2GDP in US$ billions.IMD
ProtectionismE3Survey data collected from mid- and upper-level managers. The respondents were asked to rate their agreement with the statement “Government protectionism does not impair the way you conduct business” on a scale of 1 (strongly disagree) to 6 (strongly agree).IMD
SocialHealth infrastructureS1Survey data collected from mid- and upper-level managers. The respondents were asked to rate their agreement with the statement “Health infrastructure meets the needs of society” on a scale of 1 (strongly disagree) to 6 (strongly agree).IMD
Pension fundingS2Survey data collected from mid- and upper-level managers. The respondents were asked to rate their agreement with the statement “Pension funding is adequately addressed for the future” on a scale of 1 (strongly disagree) to 6 (strongly agree).IMD
Gender gap indexS3Evaluates gender disparities across four main dimensions: 1. Economic Participation and Opportunity, 2. Educational Attainment, 3. Health and Survival, and 4. Political Empowerment.World Economic Forum
TechnologicalHigher education researchersT1The number of researchers in higher education as a percentage of the national total.OECD
Global Innovation IndexT2Utilizes a comprehensive dataset comprising 81 indicators sourced from various international public and private sources. It also recognizes the leading 100 science and technology hubs globally.WIPO

Pedroni Residual Cointegration Test for political (P), economic (E), social (S), and technological (T) environment models

Panel statisticsrho-StatisticPP-StatisticADF-Statistic
ModelsStatisticp-valueStatisticp-valueStatisticp-value
P1.75540.9604–5.90670.0000–2.95720.0016
E1.09230.8626–6.39560.0000–9.20530.0000
S1.54070.9383–5.33680.0000–4.52240.0000
T1.39980.9192–0.99270.1604–0.20060.4205

Political and economic settings: the long- and short-run results of the Panel ARDL

Political environmentEconomic environment
VariableCoefficientt-Statisticp-valueVariableCoefficientt-Statisticp-value
Panel A: Long run equation
P1–0.2980–13.21770.0000E1–0.0846–4.14770.0002
P2–0.0317–0.95570.3456E20.00332.66200.0115
P3–1.6533–4.67090.0000E30.01160.13600.8926
Panel B: Short run equation
ECT–0.8026–3.27750.0023ECT–0.8623–4.42940.0001
D(P1)0.38412.66110.0116D(E1)–0.2028–0.69170.4936
D(P2)–0.5059–1.06410.2944D(E2)0.01692.08820.0439
D(P3)2.72320.84230.4052D(E3)–0.6772–1.33440.1904
C2–7.3913–0.72770.4715C20.83380.23430.8160
C131.79510.81480.4206C–14.2001–0.31210.7567

Social and technological settings: the long- and short-run results of the Panel ARDL

Social environmentTechnological environment
VariableCoefficientt-Statisticp-valueVariableCoefficientt-Statisticp-value
Panel A: Long run equation
S11.46041.75870.0888T10.37113.51750.0015
S20.62942.40310.0226T2–0.0072–0.27910.7822
S35.49881.06660.2947
Panel B: Short run equation
ECT–1.0465–5.33780.0000ECT–0.5580–1.43290.1630
D(S1)–1.1831–1.20650.2371D(T1)–0.7753–0.65150.5200
D(S2)–0.2583–0.31430.7554D(T2)–1.5841–1.03230.3108
D(S3)61.41421.22660.2295
C2–4.7438–1.41510.1673C2–65.7641–0.92970.3605
C48.83631.01210.3196C1013.05900.92460.3631
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ijme-2025-0003 | Journal eISSN: 2543-5361 | Journal ISSN: 2299-9701
Language: English
Page range: 391 - 403
Submitted on: Jun 8, 2024
|
Accepted on: Dec 11, 2024
|
Published on: Dec 30, 2024
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2024 Sylwia Cieślik, Tomasz Sosnowski, published by Warsaw School of Economics
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.