Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Role of the state in implementation of strategic investment projects: The SaHo Model for nuclear power Cover

Role of the state in implementation of strategic investment projects: The SaHo Model for nuclear power

Open Access
|Oct 2021

Figures & Tables

Table 1

Advantages and disadvantages of business models – the EU investor's perspective

ModelAdvantagesDisadvantages
Electricity marketCompliance with EU state aid rulesNo offtake
High price volatility, negative prices
High investment risk
PPAOfftake
Stable selling prices
No compliance with EU state aid rules
CfD, CEACStable selling prices
State loan guarantees
No offtake
EC acceptance required case by case
CfD (Czech version)Offtake
Stable selling prices
State loan guarantees
Model waiting for EC acceptance
RABStable selling prices
Charging consumers from the beginning of construction
State loan guarantees
No compliance with EU state aid rules (probably)
No offtake
PTCFixed state subsidy for every megawatt hour (MWh) of electricity generated
Regulatory risk insurance
State (federal) loan guarantees
No offtake
High price volatility, negative prices
No compliance with EU state aid rules
ZECRelatively stable selling pricesNo offtake
No compliance with EU state aid rules
CESA subsidy in market revenueNo offtake
No compliance with EU state aid rules
Subsidy value is set by (dynamic) market
CMCovering of fixed production costsNo offtake (for energy)
High price volatility, negative prices
EC acceptance required case by case
Short-term auctions
Unfavorable to units with high fixed costs
Carbon tax/ETSIncreasing of costs for coal- and gas-based competitors
Compliance with EU state aid rules
No offtake
High price volatility, negative prices
ExeltiumOfftake
Contracted sales of large electricity volume at relatively stable (indexed) price
Price volatility in the long term, dependent on the wholesale market price index
Offtakers have a right to withdraw
EC acceptance required case by case (probably)
MankalaOfftake
Selling price covers all production costs
Compliance with EU state aid rules
High risk before and during construction
The model requires a perfect cooperation of dozens of shareholders

[i] Source: Own elaboration.

[ii] CM, Capacity Mechanism; CEAC, Carbon Emissions Avoidance Credit; CES, Clean Energy Standard; CfD, Contract for Difference; EC, European Commission; ETS, Emissions Trading System; EU, European Union; PPA, Power Purchase Agreement; PTC, Production Tax Credit; RAB, Regulatory Asset Base; ZEC, Zero Emission Credit.

Figure 1

Median of investment costs for various electricity sources (USD′2019, millions).

Source: Own elaboration based on [Projected Costs…, 2020, pp. 43–44].

CCGT – Combined Cycle Gas Turbine; mln, million; PV - Photovoltaics.

Figure 2

Predevelopment costs for various electricity sources in the UK (GBP′2018/MWh).

Source: Own elaboration based on Electricity generation costs [2020, p. 26].

CCGT – Combined Cycle Gas Turbine; PV - Photovoltaics.

Figure 3

Changes in the ownership structure in the SaHo Model at subsequent stages of the project (basic scheme).

Source: Own elaboration. SPV, Special Purpose Vehicle.

Figure 4

Changes in the ownership structure in the SaHo Model at subsequent stages of the project (detailed scheme).

Source: Own elaboration. SPV, Special Purpose Vehicle.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ijme-2021-0020 | Journal eISSN: 2543-5361 (formerly 2299-9701) | Journal ISSN: 2299-9701
Language: English
Page range: 343 - 359
Submitted on: May 5, 2021
Accepted on: Aug 27, 2021
Published on: Oct 13, 2021
Published by: SGH Warsaw School of Economics
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
JEL:

© 2021 Łukasz Sawicki, Bożena Horbaczewska, published by SGH Warsaw School of Economics
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.