Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Fig. 4

Fig. 5

Fig. 6

Fig. 7

Comparison of Bernoulli wavelet results with Roy et al_ [20] for Nr = 0_2, Q = 0, Nc = 1, β = 0_2, θa = 0, θs = 0_
| η | BWM | ADM | NM | GM |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0.667011 | 0.666858 | 0.667013 | 0.667013 |
| 0.1 | 0.670132 | 0.669984 | 0.670132 | 0.670132 |
| 0.2 | 0.679512 | 0.679386 | 0.679514 | 0.679514 |
| 0.3 | 0.695228 | 0.695136 | 0.695229 | 0.695228 |
| 0.4 | 0.717398 | 0.717357 | 0.717399 | 0.717399 |
| 0.5 | 0.746198 | 0.746220 | 0.746198 | 0.746198 |
| 0.6 | 0.781854 | 0.781944 | 0.781855 | 0.781855 |
| 0.7 | 0.824659 | 0.824806 | 0.824655 | 0.824659 |
| 0.8 | 0.874972 | 0.875145 | 0.874972 | 0.874971 |
| 0.9 | 0.933238 | 0.933373 | 0.933237 | 0.933237 |
| 1.0 | 1.000000 | 1.000000 | 1.000000 | 1.000000 |