Have a personal or library account? Click to login
By:
Open Access
|Jan 2024

Full Article

1
Introduction

Number theory is one of the oldest mathematical disciplines. It deals with the properties of integers [1, 2]. One of the central topics in number theory is the factorization of the numbers and if a number cannot be factored into a product of two or more integers then it is a prime number. A prime is, therefore, an integer that is only divisible by integers 1 and the number itself. Methods for establishing whether a number is a prime or a composite number in a consecutive sequence of integers include several methods such as Eratosthenes, Selberg, Brun and others [3].

Primes have many interesting properties that have been studied since antiquity and a number of papers and books have been written about them [4,5,6,7,8,9,10]. A computational perspective on primes is provided in the book Prime Numbers, a Computational Perspective by Crandall and Pomerance [11]. A prime pair (also called a double prime in this paper) is two primes separated by an even number. The conjecture that there is an infinite number of such prime pairs is still unsolved although substantial progress has been made [12]. A numerical analysis approach to the twin prime conjecture is found in [13]. Interesting computational results in number theory are also found in the book Experimental Number Theory by Villegas [14]. Some areas of current interest are primality testing, that is checking if a natural number is a prime number, and factoring non-primes into its prime factors [15,16,17]. The paper [12] discusses the gaps that might occur between successive primes.

Prime patterns have been of interest to a number of authors [18, 19] and prime constellations have been discussed by, for example [20]. Both prime patterns and prime constellations are concerned with particular configurations of primes. In this paper a new pattern forming a hierarchy of groups of primes is depicted as a binary tree as shown in Figure 1 where each level of the tree represents particular constellations.

The hierarchy consists of constellations of double primes some of which form the basis for quadruple primes which are then, in some cases, the basis for octuple primes where the exact nature of these constellations will be discussed in the sequel. Known and new properties for these constellations of primes are proven and examples of quadruple and octuple primes are exhibited. A conjecture for the existence of 16-tuple primes is stated as well.

The paper is in parts experimental mathematics [21, 22] where interesting numerical facts are established using a computer and in parts theoretical mathematics when some properties of these prime constellations are proven.

Applications of the results in this paper might include cryptography.

Fig. 1

The hierarchy formed from primes, double primes, qudruple primes and an octuple prime.

2
Definitions

By “center” of a prime n-tuple is meant the midpoint between the “centers” two (n − 1) tuples defining the n-tuple.

  • The letter E denotes “even”.

  • The letter P will denote “prime”.

  • The term “index” denotes a number being considered.

  • The abbreviation “divis” is short for divisor.

  • “dcenter” denotes the center of a double prime.

  • “qcenter” denotes the center of a quadruple prime.

  • “ocenter” denotes the center of octuple primes.

  • “scenter” denotes the center of a sextuple prime if it exists.

  • “tuple” denotes any of the double, quadruple or octuple primes.

  • “span” denotes the distance between centers of defining tuples in the hierarchy of tuples.

3
Double primes

A double prime, also called a prime pair or twin primes, is a set of two primes separated by an even non-prime which is called the dcenter of the double prime. The first double primes are d1 = (1,3),d2 = (3,5),d3 = (5,7),d4 = (11,13) where d2 is a special case since it uses the second number from the previous double prime together with the first number from the following double prime.

The following simple result is well known, but established here as well.

Theorem 1

Assume d > 4. If d =dcenter is the center of a double prime then d + 3 is divisible by 3.

Proof

Table 1

Double prime example.

indexd − 3d − 2d − 1dd + 1d + 2d + 3d + 4d + 5
divisEPdcenterPEE

In Table 1 d > 4 is the dcenter of a double prime and it follows that d − 2 cannot be divisible by 3 since it would imply that d + 1 was composite. Together with the fact that d − 1 is prime it follows that d − 3 is divisible by 3. Similarly d and d + 3 are also divisible by 3 since they form a sequence d − 3, d, d + 3.

From this theorem it follows that if the dcenter of a double prime is d then the first possible prime after the double prime would be at d + 5 since d + 3 is divisible by 3. Hence a possible succeeding double prime would have the center at d + 6.

Double primes have been studied by a number of authors and for some background on these primes see for example [23] and [24, 25].

4
Quadruple primes

A quadruple prime is a set of two double primes with dcenters d1 and d2 separated by 3 non-primes which is the smallest distance possible between two double primes (assuming that the dcenters are greater than 6). The center of the quadruple prime is called the qcenter=q = (d1 + d2)/2.

Computationally exhibiting the following case of a two double primes with dcenters at d1 = 12 and d2 = 18 separated by 3 non-primes provides an example of a quadruple prime with qcenter at q = 15 as shown in Table 2.

Table 2

Quadruple prime example.

index1011121314151617181920
divisEPd1PEq-centerEPd2PE

Note that it is easily shown that two double primes separated by an even number is not possible hence the separation would have to be at least 3 numbers.

The first case of a quadruple prime has dcenters d1 = 6 and d2 = 12 with qcenter at q = 9 which overlaps with the case considered above. It is conjectured that this is the only case for which there is such an overlap.

Examples of quadruple primes are found, for example, in [26].

Before continuing it should be noted that given a consecutive list of k positive integers, exactly one of the integers is divisible by k. (For a proof see for example [27].)

There are some results for quadruple primes that are now discussed in the following theorem.

Theorem 2

If q =qcenter is the center of a quadruple prime then

  • q − 6 is divisible by 3.

  • q − 5 is divisible by 5.

  • q − 6 is not divisible by 5.

Proof

  • This follows from the remark above for double primes. As a result the sequence numbers from q − 9 to q + 4 have the divisibility properties shown in Table 3.

    Table 3

    Divisibility by 3.

    indexq − 9q − 8q − 7q − 6q − 5q − 4q − 3q − 2q − 1qq + 1q + 2q + 3q+4
    divis2,3232P2,3P232P2,3P

    Consider the numbers q − 5,q − 6,q − 7,q − 8,q − 9. Since this is a continuous sequence of 5 numbers exactly one of the numbers is divisible by 5.

    Viewing Table 3 it follows that:

    • - q − 6 cannot be divisible by 5 since it would imply that q + 4 would be divisible by 5, a contradiction since q + 4 is prime.

    • - q − 7 cannot be divisible by 5 since it would imply that q − 2 would be divisible by 5, a contradiction since q − 2 is prime.

    • - q − 8 cannot be divisible by 5 since it would imply that q + 2 would be divisible by 5, a contradiction since q + 2 is prime.

    • - q − 9 cannot be divisible by 5 since it would imply that q − 4 would be divisible by 5, a contradiction since q − 4 is prime.

    Hence q − 5 is divisible by 5. By symmetry q + 5 is also divisible by 5.

  • It follows immediately from 2) that q − 6 is not divisible by 5 and hence any divisor has to be 3 together with 7 or larger.

Divisibility by 2, 3 and 5 is now shown in Table 4.

Table 4

Divisibility by 2, 3 and 5 around qprime q.

indexq − 7q − 6q − 5q − 4q − 3q − 2q − 1qq + 1q + 2q + 3q + 4
divis232,5P2,3P23,52P2,3P

Consider now the quadruple prime with qcenter q = 195 with known primes and the numbers divisible by 2, 3 and 5 adjacent to 195. These numbers are listed in Figure 2.

Fig. 2

Divisors around specific qcenter q = 195.

For a general quadruple prime with qcenter q the table is as in Figure 3.

Fig. 3

Divisors around general qcenter q.

In the figures there are two framed sequences. The red-framed sequence centered on the qcenter 195 runs from 190 to 199 see Figure 2, or in terms of distances to a general qcenter q, the sequence runs from q − 4 to q + 4, see Figure 3. These red frames define the quadruple primes with qcenter 195 (or in general q). The notations in the lines “divis” indicate both the divisors and the primes that are present in this case. The primes at 191, 193, 197 and 199 (or in terms of the general case q − 4, q − 2, q + 2 and q + 4) are present for each of the cases of quadruple primes. The P's in Figure 2 at 221, 223, 227, 229, 233, 239 and 241 are specific to the case where q = 195.

Given the sequence of divisors shown in Figure 2 it is clear that the first possible quadruple prime following the quadruple prime with qcenter 195 would have to have a qcenter at 225. In this particular case 221 is undefined, 223 a prime, 227 a prime and 229 a prime. This means that if 221 had been prime then 225 would have been the qcenter of a new quadruple prime as indicated by the green frame.

The green frame in table in Figure 3 shows the general case indicating that if q + 30 was the qcenter of a quadruple prime then the fact that q + 26, q + 28, q + 32 and q + 34 are undefined opens up the possibility that they might be prime and hence if they happened to be prime then the sequence q + 26 to q + 34 would be a quadruple prime. In general, for a quadruple prime with qcenter q the entries q + 26, q + 28, q + 32 and q + 34 may be prime or composite as shown in Table 5. The entries at q + 14 and q + 16, which will be discussed later, may also be prime or composite.

Table 5

Primality of q + 26, q + 28, q + 32 and q + 34 for general q-center=q.

q-centerq + 26q + 28q + 32q + 34

195NOYESYESYES
825NOYESYESYES
1485YESNONONO
1875NOYESYESNO
2085YESYESNONO
21015NONONONO

The following result places some restrictions on the possible quadruple primes with qcenter q+30 following a quadruple prime with qcenter q.

Theorem 3

Let q be the qcenter of a quadruple prime where q + 28 and q + 34 are primes such as is the case for the example q = 195.

Then q − 6 is divisible by 7 and the table in Figure 2 can be expanded with added information to a new Table 6.

Proof

Consider now the sequence q − 7,⋯,q − 1. Then exactly one number in the sequence is divisible by 7.

q − 7 cannot be divisible by 7 since it would imply q + 28 would be divisible by 7, a contradiction since q + 28 is prime.

q − 5 cannot be divisible by 7 since it would contradict the primality of q + 2.

q − 3 cannot be divisible by 7 since it would imply q + 4 was composite which is not the case.

q − 1 cannot be divisible by 7 since it would contradict the primality of q + 34.

q − 4 and q − 2 are prime.

This leaves q − 6 which therefore has to be divisible by 7.

Note that the theorem does not imply that if q − 6 is divisible by 7 then q + 28 and q + 34 are prime. An example verifying this is provided by q = 1003365.

The table in Figure 2 can now be expanded with added information to the table in Figure 4.

Fig. 4

Expanded table in the neighborhood of the quadruple prime with qcenter 195, now including divisibility by 7.

Table 6

Divisors in the neighborhood of the quadruple prime with qcenter 195, now including 7.

index185186187188189190191192193194
divis52,323,72,5P2,3P2
index195196197198199200201202203204
divis3,52,7P2,3P2,53272,3
index205206207208209210211212213214
divis52322,3,5,7P232
index215216217218219220221222223224
divis52,37232,52,3P2,7
index225226227228229230231232233234
divis3,52P2,3P2,53,72PE,3
index235236237238239240241242243244
divis5232,7P2,3,5P232

5
Octuple primes

In the table in Figure 2 when starting from the quaduple prime center q = 195 the first possible following quadruple prime could have been with the numbers 221 = q + 26, 223 = q + 28, 227 = q + 32 and 229 = q + 34 as in Table 6. In this specific case 223, 226 and 229 are primes and 221 is composite. Hence in this case there is no second quadruple prime, however, due to the compositedness of 221. It is noted that since 223 and 229 are primes 189 is divisible by 7.

Fig. 5

Table of divisors for a general octuple where first quadruple has qcenter= q.

The question is therefore, are there quadruple primes q where the factors q + 26, q + 28, q + 32 and q + 34 are all prime? If so, then the sequence q − 26 to q + 34 would form a new quadruple prime with center qn = q + 30. The two quadruple primes with centers q and qn would then form what could be called an octuple prime with an o-center=o = q + 15. This would look like the table in Figure 5. Note that all of the entries in the table are specified with respect to divisibility by 2, 3, 5 and/or 7 except for the entries q + 14 and q + 16. The divisibility by 7 is a consequence of the primality requirements for q + 26 and q + 34 which implies the divisibility of q − 6 and hence any of the further entries q − 6 + k * 7,k = 1,2,⋯.

The question is now: do octuple primes defined in this manner exist and if so, what specific properties do they have? It should be noted that the term octuple prime has been used before in a slightly different context, see for example [24]. It is used in this context to denote the progression of particular tuples from primes to double primes then quadruple primes and finally octuple primes.

As shown computationally in [26] octuple primes exist and the first octuple prime has o-center=o = 1006320. The details of this octuple prime are listed in Table 7.

Table 7

The octuple with o-center= o = 1006320.

type of centercenter labelcenter valuefactored center

d-centerd111006302(2,1),(3,1),(11,1),(79,1),(193,1)
q-centerq11006305(3,1),(5,1),(73,1),(919,1)
d-centerd121006308(2,2),(3,2),(27953,1)
o-centero1006320(2,4),(3,1),(5,1),(7,1),(599,1)
d-centerd211006332(2,2),(3,1),(17,1),(4933,1)
q-centerq21006335(3,2),(5,1),(11,1),(19,1),(107,1)
d-centerd221006338(2,1),(3,1),(179,1),(937,1)

In the case of double primes there was one non-prime separating the two primes and in the case of quadruple primes there were three non-primes separating the double primes. In a sense the “gaps” between the previous sets of primes were small, i.e one and three steps. In the case of octuple primes the gap is much larger. For a given octuple center o there are 30 numbers between the constituent quadruple primes with centers q1 and q2. Most of the gap entries are defined by their divisibility. From the results above only the quantities o − 1 and o + 1 are not specified in the table in Figure 6. The octuple primes may therefore be classified into three cases depending on whether these quantities are prime or not as in Table 8.

Fig. 6

Octuple with ocenter o between o − 26 and o + 24.

Table 8

Primality o − 1 and o + 1 for select cases of octuple primes.

o =o-centerprime o − 1prime o + 1

1006320FalseFalse
2594970FalseTrue
3919230TrueFalse
9600570FalseTrue
10531080FalseFalse
157131660FalseTrue
179028780TrueFalse
211950270TrueFalse
255352230FalseFalse
267587880FalseFalse
724491390TrueFalse
871411380FalseFalse

The octuples with composite o − 1 and o + 1 might be denoted as pure octuples and the remaining octuples as impure octuples.

Table 9

Pure and impure octuples up to 1010.

Number of octuple primesPure octuple primesOctuple prime with o − 1 primeOcuple primes with o + 1 primeOcuple primes with o − 1 and o + 1 prime
65429140

There are not many prime octuples. The results shown in Table 9 show the number of octuple primes of the different kinds for numbers up to 1010.

The table shows that there are no octuple primes where both o − 1 and o + 1 are prime. Because of this one might be tempted to conjecture that there are no octuple primes where the primes on both sides of the octuple center are prime.

However, when the computations are performed up to 1011 the results are as in Table 10 disproving the conjecture.

Table 10

Pure and impure octuples up to 1011.

Number of octuple primesPure octuple primesOctuple primes with o − 1 primeOctuple primes with o + 1 primeOctuple primes with o − 1 and o + 1 prime
26718734473

The three examples where o−1 and o+1 are both prime have ocenters o1 = 39713433690, o2 = 66419473050 and o3 = 71525244630.

6
Conclusion

The previous sections have shown that the centres of the double, quadruple and octuple primes form a sequence as shown in Table 11.

Table 11

Divisors of centers.

centers divisible byspan divisible bycomment

dcenter11*2verified
qcenter31*2*3verified
ocenter151*2*3*5verified
scenter1051*2*3*5*7hypothetical

Since the ocentres of octuple are all divisible by 15 = 3 * 5 one might conjecture that there are sixtentuple primes composed of two octuple primes whose ocentres are separated by 210 = 2 * 3 * 5 * 7 and with a scenter divisible by 3 * 5 * 7 = 105. This table shows an unusual regularity in the first three entries rarely found in the literature on primes.

Considering that a specific octuple prime has the properties in the neighborhood as in Table 12 a possible second ocenter at a distance of 210 from the given ocenter would be as in Table 13.

Table 12

Divisors in the neighborhood of the first o-center o of a possible sixtentuple prime.

indexqn−1 − 4qn−1 − 3qn−1 − 2qn−1 − 1qn−1qn−1 + 1qn−1 + 2qn−1 + 3qn−1 + 4
divisunsp.2,3unsp.23,52,7unsp.2,3unsp.
Table 13

Divisors in the neighborhood of the second o-center on of a possible sixtentuple prime.

indexqn+1 − 4qn+1 − 3qn+1 − 2qn+1 − 1qn+1qn+1 + 1qn+1 + 2qn+1 + 3qn+1 + 4
divisunsp.2,3unsp.2,73,52unsp.2,3unsp.

In both o-center cases there are entries that are unspecified as far as the divisors 3, 5, 7 are concerned. This means that the possibility of these entries all being prime is not excluded.

For the specific case of o-center o = 100320, if it were the first o-center for a sixtentuple prime then the second o-center would be at on = 100530. Since on is not the o-center of an octuple it does not show the existence of a sixtentuple prime, however. Further numerical exploration would be needed to demonstrate the possible existence of sixtentuple primes.

7
Declarations
7.1
Conflict of interest 

There is no conflict of interest.

7.2
Author's contributions

J.R.-Conceptualization, Methodology, Formal analysis, Writing-Review and Editing, Validation, Writing-Original Draft, Resources. All authors read and approved the final submitted version of this manuscript.

7.3
Funding

No funding was received to assist with the preparation of this manuscript.

7.4
Acknowledgement

Not applicable.

7.5
Data availability statement

All data that support the findings of this study are included within the article.

7.6
Using of AI tools

The authors declare that they have not used Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools in the creation of this article.

Language: English
Page range: 251 - 262
Submitted on: Oct 13, 2023
Accepted on: Dec 25, 2023
Published on: Jan 10, 2024
Published by: Harran University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2024 Jon Rokne, published by Harran University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.