Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Testing ChatGPT in Music Promotion: Assessing AI Efficiency Compared to Industry Standards Cover

Testing ChatGPT in Music Promotion: Assessing AI Efficiency Compared to Industry Standards

Open Access
|Oct 2026

Figures & Tables

Figure 1.

Framework for inductive-deductive comparative content analysis.

Figure 2.

Efficiency criteria (codes) for the promotional tools based on the literature.

Table 1.

Content analysis grid in the form of a score sheet.

Efficiency criterion (c)Number of generated texts in which the criterion appears out of the total (nGTc/nGT)Example in the generated text (eGT1, eGT2…eGTn)
c1nGTc1/nGTeGTn: “…”
c2nGTc2/nGTeGTn: “…”
c3nGTc3/nGTeGTn: “…”
Table 2.

Website strategy analysis.

Efficiency criterion codeNumber of generated texts in which the criterion appears out of the totalExample in the generated text
Include music samples or clear call-to-action to listen or purchase2/3eGT2, eGT3: Make sure it’s easy for fans to access and stream your music.
Avoid overly animated or flashy website designs3/3eGT1, eGT2: Avoid cluttering the site with too many visuals or text
Add a press kit or media section with relevant information0/3eGT3: Avoid overcrowding the website with too much text or visuals

[i] TES, total efficiency score.

[ii] TES = (2 × 33% + 3 × 33% + 0 × 33%)/3.

[iii] TES = (66% + 99% + 0%)/3.

[iv] TES = 55%.

Table 3.

Social media strategy analysis.

Efficiency criterion codeNumber of generated texts in which the criterion appears out of the totalExample in the generated text
Choose platforms that align with your audience and brand2/3
  • eGT2: Choose the right platforms

  • eGT3: Determine what platforms the audience uses

Maintain authenticity and a personal tone to build connection1/3eGT3: Sharing behind-the-scenes moments or personal stories can help build a connection with the audience
Maintain a consistent posting schedule3/3
  • eGT1: Create a schedule for posting

  • eGT2: Create a content calendar

  • eGT3: The artist should create a schedule

[i] TES, total efficiency score.

[ii] TES = (2 × 33% + 1 × 33% + 3 × 33%)/3.

[iii] TES = (66% + 33% + 99%)/3.

[iv] TES = 66%.

Table 4.

Video content strategy analysis.

Efficiency criterion (c)Number of generated texts in which the criterion appears out of the total (nGTc/nGT)Example in the generated text (eGT1, eGT2…eGTn)
Keep videos short (around 3 min)3/3
  • eGT1: Keep the video short

  • eGT2: Keep the length between 3–5 minutes

  • eGT3: Aim for 3–5 minutes per video

Add links to music and social media platforms2/3
  • eGT1: Include a clear call to action (e.g., follow on social media, stream new single, buy album)

  • eGT2: Voiceover: Don’t miss out on the latest from [Artist Name]. Follow them on social media and check out their upcoming tour dates

Use a compelling or attractive video title1/3eGT1: Craft a catchy title that reflects the content of the video and grabs the viewer’s attention

[i] TES, total efficiency score.

[ii] TES = (3 × 33% + 2 × 33% + 1 × 33%)/3.

[iii] TES = (99% + 66% + 33%)/3.

[iv] TES = 66%.

Language: English
Submitted on: Sep 23, 2025
Accepted on: Mar 13, 2026
Published on: Oct 1, 2026
Published by: International Music Business Research Association
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2026 Adrian Remus Chețan, published by International Music Business Research Association
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

AHEAD OF PRINT