Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Impact of COVID-19 on Basque Musicians: Identifying Main Associations Cover

Impact of COVID-19 on Basque Musicians: Identifying Main Associations

Open Access
|Oct 2024

Figures & Tables

Figure 1.

Evaluation model.

Table 1.

Independent variables (general characteristics).

I1Gender
I2Music studies
I3Other studies
I4Age
I5Experience
I6Other job
I7Music style
I8Labour market situation
Table 2.

Dependent variables.

V1Impact of COVID-19 on own musical activity
V2Impact of COVID-19 on income
V3Expectations regarding income recovery in 2021 and beyond
V4Expectations regarding carrying on with same type of musical employment in 2021 and beyond
V5Expectations regarding carrying on with any type of musical employment in 2021 and beyond
V6Expectations regarding a recovery of the demand of own musical activity in 2021 and beyond
V7Expectations regarding a recovery of the demand of live concerts in 2021 and beyond
V8General life satisfaction

[i] All these variables are ordinal variables. Variables 1 and 2 offered five possible answers. While the answers for Variable 1 (effect of COVID-19 on music activity) ranged from “very positive” (1), to “very negative” (5), answers to Variable 2 (impact of COVID-19 on income) ranged from an income loss between 0% and 20% (1) to an income loss between 81% and 100% (5). V3–V8 offered ten possible answers (being 1 = very low, and 10 = very high).

Figure 2.

Gender and year of birth.

Figure 3.

Musical and other studies.

Figure 4.

Type of musician, music style and labour market situation.

Figure 5.

Main income source and other job.

Table 3.

Correlation rates (independent variables – V1, V2).

I1I2I3I4I5I6I7I8
V1−0.0960.145−0.159−0.042−0.1680.026−0.1010.116
V2−0.1130.0440.0280.007−0.0350.1680.100−0.035
Figure 6.

Impact of COVID-19 on music activity and income.

Figure 7.

Form of income support and new online media strategies..

Figure 8.

COVID-19 grants and funding.

Table 4.

Correlation rates (independent variables – V3–V8).

I1I2I3I4I5I6I7I8
V3−0.212−0.288*−0.0130.1450.102−0.095−0.130−0.034
V4−0.136−0.202−0.290.296*0.269*−0.093−0.2410.109
V5−0.299*0.084−0.0120.1450.202−0.049−0.0740.114
V6−0.229−0.394**−0.1580.0840.155−0.219−0.123−0.152
V7−0.203−0.350**−0.172−0.0190.125−0.332*−0.055−0.106
V8−0.306*−0.039−0.034−0.077−0.083−0.122−0.135−0.045

* Significant correlation on 0.05 level.

** Significant correlation on 0.01 level.

Table 5.

Inference main results.

Independent variableHypothesisAffected variableSig. level
I1GenderH1V50.028
H2V80.025
I2Music studiesH3V30.035
H4V60.04
H5V70.01
I4Other jobH6V70.013
I5AgeH7V40.005
Table 6.

Results of inference (gender-V5, V8).

Model 1 (gender)V5 (expectations carrying on any musical activity)V8 (satisfaction with life)
Total No.5555
Mann–Whitney’s U152.000149.000
Wilcoxon’s W230.000227.000
Test statistic152.000149.000
Standard error48.23348.524
Standardised test statistic−2.198−2.246
Asymptotic sig. (bilateral test)0.0280.025

[i] As can be seen, both hypotheses (H1 and H2) are rejected. Therefore, Gender is a significant variable when it comes to explain V5 and V8. The significance level is 0.028 for V5 and 0.025 for V8.

Figure 9.

Box plots of V5 (up) and V8 (down) by gender.

Table 7.

Results of inference (gender-V3, V6 and V7).

Model 2 (music studies)V3 (expectations on future income recovery)V6 (expectations on own activity demand recovery)V7 (expectations on live concerts' demand recovery)
Total No.555555
Mann-Whitney’s U245.500200.000218.500
Wilcoxon’s W521.500476.000494.500
Test statistic245.500200.000218.500
Standard error57.94758.09958.128
Standardised test statistic−2.114−2.892−2.572
Asymptotic sig. (bilateral test)0.0350.0040.010

[i] As can be seen, all three hypotheses (H3–H5) are rejected. Therefore, Music Studies is a significant variable when it comes to explain V3, V6 and V7. The significance level is 0.035 for V3, 0.004 for V6 and 0.010 for V7.

Figure 10.

Box plots of V3 (up), V6 (middle) and V7 (down) by music studies.

Table 8.

Results of inference (other job – V7).

Model 3 (other job)V7 (expectations recovery of the demand live concerts)
Total No.55
Test statistic10.712a
Degrees of freedom3
Asymptotic sig. (bilateral test)0.013

a Test statistics are adjusted for ties.

Figure 11.

Box plots of V7 by other job.

Table 9.

Results of inference (age, V4).

Model 4 (age)V4 (expectations regarding carrying on with own activity)
Total No.55
Mann–Whitney’s U530.500
Wilcoxon’s W1,058.500
Test statistic530.837
Standard error57.837
Standardised test statistic2.810
Asymptotic sig. (bilateral test)0.005

[i] As can be seen, hypothesis 7 is rejected. Therefore, Age is a significant variable when it comes to explain V4. The significance level is 0.005.

Figure 12.

Box plots of V4 by age.

Table 10.

Correlation rates (V1, V2 – V3–V8).

V3V4V5V6V7V8
V1−0.350**−0.0145−0.152−0.351**−0.282*−0.298*
V2−0.435**−0.425**−0.315*−0.362**−0.409**−0.289*

* Significant correlation on 0.05 level.

** Significant correlation on 0.01 level.

Table 11.

Results on inference tests.

Independent variableHypothesisAffected variableSig. level
V1Impact of COVID-19 on activityH8V30.046
V2Impact of COVID-19 on incomeH9V30.027
H10V40.029
H11V70.031

[i] Results of the inference are presented considering each of the variables belonging to block “Impact of COVID-19 on activity and income.”

Table 12.

Results of inference (impact of COVID-19 on activity-V3).

Model 4 (activity)V3 (expectations on future income recovery)
Total No.55
Test statistic8.001a
Degrees of freedom3
Asymptotic sig. (bilateral test)0.046

a Test statistics are adjusted for ties.

Figure 13.

Box plots of V3 by V1 (impact of COVID-19 on activity).

Table 13.

Results of inference (impact of COVID-19 on income-V3, V4, V7).

Model 4 (income)V3 (expectations on future income recovery)V4 (expectations regarding carrying on with own activity)V7 (expectations recovery of the demand live concerts)
Total No.555555
Test statistic8.001a10.820a10.600a
Degrees of freedom344
Asymptotic sig. (bilateral test)0.0460.0290.031

a Test statistics are adjusted for ties.

Figure 14.

Box plots of V3 (up), V4 (middle) and V7 (down) by V2.

Language: English
Page range: 63 - 83
Submitted on: May 16, 2024
Accepted on: Jul 26, 2024
Published on: Oct 31, 2024
Published by: International Music Business Research Association
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2024 Gaizka Insunza Aranceta, Izaskun Alavarez-Meaza, Aitor Basañez Llantada, published by International Music Business Research Association
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.