References
- Acker, J. (1990). Hierarchies, Jobs, Bodies. In the Social Construction of Gender. Gender and Society, 1(4), 139-58.
- Acker, S., & Dillabough, J. A. (2007). Women ‘learning to labour’ in the ‘male emporium’: Exploring gendered work in teacher education. Gender and Education, 19(3), 297–316.
- Adisa, T. A., Antonacopoulou, E., Beauregard, T. A., Dickmann, M., & Adekoya, O. D. (2022). Exploring the impact of COVID-19 on employees’ boundary management and work–life balance. British Journal of Management, 33(4), 1694-1709.
- Advance HE (2023). Equality in higher education: statistical reports 2023. Advance HE, advance-he.ac.uk. Available at: https://advance-he.ac.uk/knowledge-hub/equality-higher-education-statistical-reports-2023.
- Avolio, B., Chávez, J., & Vílchez-Román, C. (2020). Factors that contribute to the underrepresentation of women in science careers worldwide: A literature review. Social Psychology of Education, 23(3), 773-794.
- Barnard, S. (2017). The AS Charter: Promoting commitment to gender equality in higher education institutions in the UK. In K. White & P. O’Connor (Eds.), Gendered success in higher education London: Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 155-174.
- Bird, S., Litt, J., & Wang, Y. (2004). Creating Status of Women Reports: Institutional Housekeeping as ‘Women’s Work’. NWSA Journal, 16 (1), 194-206.
- Bleijenbergh, I. L., Engen, M. L. V., & Vinkenburg, C. J. (2012). Othering women: Fluid images of the ideal academic. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal, 32(1), 22–35.
- Bourdieu, P. (2001). Masculine domination. Palo Alto: Stanford UniversityPress.
- Burkinshaw, P., Cahill, J., & Ford, J. (2018). Empirical evidence illuminating gendered regimes in UK higher education: Developing a new conceptual framework. Education Sciences, 8(2), 1-19.
- Butler, J. (1993). Bodies that matter: On the discourse limits of sex. New York: Routledge.
- Butler, J. (2010). Performative agency. Journal of Cultural Economy, 3(2), 147-161.
- Butler, J. (2011). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge.
- Butler, N., & Spoelstra, S. (2014). The regime of excellence and the erosion of ethos in critical management studies. British Journal of Management, 25(3), 538–550.
- Caffrey, L., Wyatt, D., Fudge, N., Mattingley, H., Williamson, C., & McKevitt, C. (2016). Gender equity programmes in academic medicine: A realist evaluation approach to AS processes. BMJ Open, 6(9), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012090
- Casad, B. J., Franks, J. E., Garasky, C. E., Kittleman, M. M., Roesler, A. C., Hall, D. Y., & Petzel, Z. W. (2021). Gender inequality in academia: Problems and solutions for women faculty in STEM. Journal of Neuroscience Research, 99(1), 13-23.
- Connell, R. W. (1995). Masculinities. Cambridge: Polity Press.
- Connell, R. W. & Messerschmidt, J. W. (2005). Hegemonic masculinity: Rethinking the concept. Gender & Society, 19(6), 829–859.
- Corbin, J. M., & Strauss, A. (1990). Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology, 13(1), 3–21
- Equality Challenge Unit. (2018). About Advance HE’s Athena SWAN Charter. Equality Challenge Unit. [Online] Available at: https://www.ecu.ac.uk/equality-charters/athena-swan/about-athena-swan/.
- Fagan, C., & Teasdale, N. (2021). Women professors across STEMM and non-STEMM disciplines: Navigating gendered spaces and playing the academic game. Work, Employment and Society, 35(4), 774-792.
- Fotaki, M. (2013). No woman is like a man (in academia): The masculine symbolic order and the unwanted female body. Organization Studies, 34(9), 1251–1275.
- Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (2017). Discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Routledge.
- Goffman, E. (1976). Gender display. Studies in the Anthropology of Visual Communication 3, 69-77.
- Grandey, A. A., Gabriel, A. S., & King, E. B. (2020). Tackling taboo topics: A review of the three M s in working women’s lives. Journal of Management, 46(1), 7-35.
- Guarino, C. M., & Borden, V. M. (2017). Faculty service loads and gender: Are women taking care of the academic family? Research in Higher Education, 58(6), 672–694.
- Harding, N. H., Ford, J., & Lee, H. (2017). Towards a performative theory of resistance: Senior managers and revolting subject(ivitie) s. Organization Studies, 38(9), 1209-1232.
- Heijstra, T. M., Steinthorsdóttir, F. S., & Einarsdóttir, T. (2017). Academic career making and the double-edged role of academic housework. Gender and Education, 29(6), 764-780.
- Herman, C., & Hilliam, R. (2018). The triple whammy: Gendered careers of geographically marginalised academic STEM women. International Journal of Gender, Science and Technology, 10(1), 171–189.
- Hesse-Biber, S. N. (2007). Teaching grounded theory. In Bryant, A. and Charmaz, K. (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Grounded Theory, SAGE Publications, pp. 311-338.
- Jenkins, J., & Finneman, T. (2018). Gender trouble in the workplace: Applying Judith Butler’s theory of performativity to news organizations. Feminist Media Studies, 18(2), 157–172.
- Kanter, R. M. (1987). Men and women of the corporation revisited. Management Review, 76(3), 14-16.
- Macfarlane, B., & Burg, D. (2019). Women professors and the academic housework trap. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 41(3), 262–274.
- McKie, A. (2020). Athena SWAN revamp urged as academics lose faith in awards. [Online] THEunijobs. Available at: https://www.timeshighereducation.com/unijobs/article/athena-swan-revamp-urged-academics-lose-faith-awards/
- Misra, J., Smith-Doerr, L., Dasgupta, N., Weaver, G., & Normanly, J. (2017). Collaboration and gender equity among academic scientists. Social Sciences, 6(1), 1-22.
- O’Connor, P. (2019). Gender imbalance in senior positions in higher education: What is the problem? What can be done? Policy Reviews in Higher Education, 3(1), 28–50.
- Ovseiko, P. V., Chapple, A., Edmunds, L. D., & Ziebland, S. (2017). Advancing gender equality through the AS Charter for Women in Science: An exploratory study of women’s and men’s perceptions. Health Research Policy and Systems, 15(1), 1–13.
- Ovseiko, P. V., Pololi, L. H., Edmunds, L. D., Civian, J. T., Daly, M., & Buchan, A. M. (2019). Creating a more supportive and inclusive university culture: A mixed-methods interdisciplinary comparative analysis of medical and social sciences at the University of Oxford. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 44(2), 166–191.
- Park, S.M. and Park-Ozee, D. (2020). Gendered divisions of labor in the twenty-first-century academy: Research, teaching, and service. In: N.S. Niemi and M.B. Weaver-Hightower (ed.) The Wiley Handbook of Gender Equity in Higher Education, John Wiley & Sons Inc. pp. 375-395.
- Rosa, R., & Clavero, S. (2022). Gender equality in higher education and research. Journal of Gender Studies, 31(1), 1-7.
- Sang, K., Powell, A., Finkel, R. and Richards, J., 2015. ‘Being an academic is not a 9–5 job’: long working hours and the ‘ideal worker’ in UK academia. Labour & Industry: a journal of the social and economic relations of work, 25(3), pp.235-249.
- Sang, K., Remnant, J., Calvard, T., & Myhill, K. (2021). Blood work: Managing menstruation, menopause and gynaecological health conditions in the workplace. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(4), pp 1-16. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18041951
- Schmidt, E.K and Cacace, M., (2017). Addressing gender inequality in science: The multifaceted challenge of assessing impact. Research Evaluation, 26(2), pp.102–114.
- Sümer, S., & Eslen-Ziya, H. (2023). Academic women’s voices on gendered divisions of work and care: ‘Working till I drop ... then dropping’. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 30(1), 49-65.
- Taylor, M. C., (2005). Interviewing. In Holloway, I. (Ed.) Qualitative research in health care, Berkshire: Open University Press. pp. 39-55.
- Teelken, C., & Deem, R. (2013). All are equal, but some are more equal than others: Managerialism and gender equality in higher education in comparative perspective. Comparative Education, 0068(January), 520–534.
- Thébaud, S., & Charles, M. (2018). Segregation, stereotypes, and STEM. Social Sciences, 7(7), 111.-119.
- Tsouroufli, M. (2019). An examination of the Athena Swan initiatives in the UK: Critical reflections. In Crimmins, G. (Ed.), Strategies for resisting sexism in the academy. Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 35–54.
- Tyler, M., & Cohen, L. (2010). Spaces that matter: Gender performativity and organizational space. Organization Studies, 31(2), 175–198.
- Tzanakou, C., & Pearce, R. (2019). Moderate feminism within or against the neoliberal university? The example of Athena SWAN. Gender, Work & Organization, 26(8), 1191–1211.
- Van den Brink, M., & Benschop, Y. (2012). Gender practices in the construction of academic excellence: Sheep with five legs. Organization, 19, 507–524.
- Wasserman, V., & Frenkel, M. (2015). Spatial work in between glass ceilings and glass walls: Gender-class intersectionality and organizational aesthetics. Organization Studies, 36,(11), 1485–1505.
- Weinfurtner, T., & Seidl, D. (2019). Towards a spatial perspective: An integrative review of research on organisational space. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 35(2), 101009 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2018.02.003.
- West, C., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1987). Doing gender. Gender & Society, 1(2), 125–151.
- Westoby, C., Dyson, J., Cowdell, F., & Buescher, T. (2021). What are the barriers and facilitators to success for female academics in UK HEIs? A narrative review. Gender and Education, 33(8), 1033-1056.
- White, K. and Burkinshaw, P., 2019. Women and leadership in higher education: Special issue editorial. Social Sciences, 8(7), p.204-211.
- Young, I. M. (1980). Throwing like a girl: A phenomenology of feminine body comportment motility and spatiality. Human Studies, 3(1), 137–156.