Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Digital Education in the Therapeutic Healthcare Professions: Occupational Therapy, Physical Therapy, and Speech and Language Therapy: a Scoping Review / Digitale Ausbildung in den therapeutischen Gesundheitsberufen Ergotherapie, Physiotherapie und Logopädie: Ein Scoping Review Cover

Digital Education in the Therapeutic Healthcare Professions: Occupational Therapy, Physical Therapy, and Speech and Language Therapy: a Scoping Review / Digitale Ausbildung in den therapeutischen Gesundheitsberufen Ergotherapie, Physiotherapie und Logopädie: Ein Scoping Review

Open Access
|Dec 2023

Figures & Tables

Figure 1:

Flow chart of article selection process.
Flow chart of article selection process.

Figure 2:

Results: Categories and sub-categories.
Results: Categories and sub-categories.

Studies included in synthesis_

No.Author (year)Students, semester, NProfessionTechnologyCountryTaught SubjectStudy Design
1Davies et al. (2012)Master, N = 16PTVCCanadaClinical reasoningQualitative design: focus groups
2Divanoglou et al. (2018)Undergraduate N ≈ 75PTVCAustralia, UKBachelor curriculumQualitative design: focus groups & evaluation
3Doyle & Jacobs (2013)Post professional graduate, N= 8OTMaterialsUSALearning stylesOnline survey
4Doyle, Jacobs & Ryan (2016)Doctoral, N = 48 faculty, N = 9OTMulti-modalUSAe-mentoringRetrospective mixed-methods design
5Furness & Kaltner (2015)Undergraduate, N = 22OTVCAustraliaPractical training and reflectionMixed-methods design
6Kelley et al. (2020)Undergraduate, N = 21SLTMaterialsUSATeaching vocabulary, shared storybook readingComparison study
7Ng et al. (2014)Third-year undergraduate, N = 8SLTVCHong KongCase studiesPilot study, comparison study face-to-face vs. online
8Plummer et al. (2021)Undergraduate, N = 72PTMaterials VideoUSAPsychomotor skillsCohort study
9Power et al. (2020)First-year undergraduate N = 30OTMaterialsAustraliaAphasia communication partner trainingPilot RCT
10Pulga et al. (2014)Fourth-year students, N =60SLTMaterialsBrazilTherapeutic procedure phonological disordersComparison study
11Ramos et al. (2015)Undergraduate, N = 30IPE (SLT & Dentist)MaterialsBrazilInterdisciplinary practicePre- and postcourse evaluation
12Schaber & Shanedling (2012)N = 86OTMaterialsUSAOT theoryMixed-methods Questionnaires, focus groups
13Stickley & Gibbs (2021)PT PhD, N = 37HIM Master’s, N = 7IPE (PT & HIM)MaterialsUSAIPCTwo-group pre/post survey
14Titterington & Bates (2018)First-year, N = 27SLTMaterialsUKPhonetic transcriptionMixed-methods observational design
15Veneri & Mongillo (2021)First-year, N = 63PTMaterialsUSAEBPPre- and postassignments
16Worobey et al. (2022)Clinicians and students, N = 41IPE (PT & OT)Multi-modalUSAWheelchair skillsCohort study with pre- vs. posttraining comparison
Language: English, German
Page range: 105 - 116
Submitted on: Aug 20, 2022
Accepted on: Oct 16, 2023
Published on: Dec 28, 2023
Published by: ZHAW Zurich University of Applied Sciences
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2023 Lisa Giesselbach, Aisha Meriel Boettcher, Sascha Sommer, published by ZHAW Zurich University of Applied Sciences
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.