Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Extension and Validation of the Self-care Index to Predict Transfer to a Post-acute Care Institution in Internal Medicine Patients / Erweiterung und Validierung des Selbstpflegeindexes bei internistischen Patienten mit dem Ziel eine Verlegung in eine post-akute Nachsorgeinstitution vorauszusagen Cover

Extension and Validation of the Self-care Index to Predict Transfer to a Post-acute Care Institution in Internal Medicine Patients / Erweiterung und Validierung des Selbstpflegeindexes bei internistischen Patienten mit dem Ziel eine Verlegung in eine post-akute Nachsorgeinstitution vorauszusagen

Open Access
|Jul 2022

Figures & Tables

Table 1

Items and scoring of the self-care index (SPI).

DimensionAdditional information
Point value: 1–4 (no ability / severely impaired ability / low impaired ability / full ability)MovementSelf-care ability activity/movement (e.g., from bed to chair)
Personal hygiene, upper bodySelf-care ability in personal hygiene, upper body
Personal hygiene, lower bodySelf-care ability in personal hygiene, lower body
Dressing, upper bodySelf-care ability in dressing and undressing upper body
Dressing, lower bodySelf-care ability in dressing and undressing lower body
Feeding, foodSelf-care ability ingestion: food
Feeding, drinkSelf-care ability ingestion: drink
Excretion, urineSelf-care ability urine excretion
Excretion, stoolSelf-care ability stool excretion
Cognition/consciousnessAbility to acquire knowledge
Scoring (sum of points):10 (full dependency)40 (full independency)

[i] Source: Koch et al. 2019, used with permission.

Table 2

Patient characteristics discharged to PAC facility versus home.

OverallDischarged to PAC facilityDischarged to homeP-value
n = 1372n = 154n = 1218
Gendera: female (%)
male (%)
571 (41.6%)
801 (58.4%)
93 (60.4%)
61 (39.6%)
478 (39.2%)
740 (60.8%)
<0.001
Ageb: mean (SD); median [IQR]66.4 (15.9)
69 [57–78]
75.3 (12.3)
77.5 [69–83]
65.3 (16.0)
68 [56–77]
<0.001
SPI first assessment on wardb: mean (SD); median [IQR]35.6 (6.0);
38 [34–40]
29.0 (7.5);
30 [25–35]
36.4 (5.2);
38 [35–40]
<0.001
Length of hospital stayb: mean (SD); median [IQR]7.7 (7.8);
6 [4–9]
16.8 (12.2);
14 [10–21]
6.6 (6.2);
5 [3–8]
<0.001

a Chi-square tests

b Mann-Whitney U-tests

Table 3

Odds ratios of discharge to a post-acute care institution by individual SPI-items compared to the original evaluation; both models include all individual items.

10 SPI all individual itemsMedical inpatients Conca, this studyMixed population Grosse Schlarmann, 2007
Odds ratioSig.Odds ratioSig.
Activity*0.730.030.40<0.001
Food intake0.700.170.510.38
Drink2.670.0014.320.07
Urine*0.920.530.390.001
Stool1.070.661.380.45
Body care, upper body1.020.930.780.64
Body care, lower body0.440.0020.230.005
Dress/undress upper body0.880.610.680.48
Dress/undress lower body0.960.892.920.06
Acquire knowledge0.57<0.0010.950.86

* p < 0.05 differences (Chi-square test).

Note: Lower item values mean higher dependence in the respective dimension. Odds ratios < 1 (> 1) stand for a positive (negative) association between discharge to a post-acute care institution and the degree of dependence in the respective item's dimension.

Endpoints; timing and criteria of SPI selection:

Discharge destination post-acute care institution after hospital; first assessment SPI (Conca, this study).

Activities of the case-management by nurses; lowest assessment SPI during hospital stay (Grosse Schlarmann, 2007)

Table 4

Comparison of training and validation measures; Age: centered (65 years).

Model training (t), validation (v)a
n = 814 (t), n = 558 (v)
AUCAICBIC
Total SPI, t0.824477.0486.4
Total SPI, v0.808338.9347.6
Total SPI + age + gender, t0.836456.5475.3
Total SPI + age + gender, v0.829321.1329.8
SPI all individual items, t0.828461.6513.3
SPI all individual items, v0.814328.2336.8
SPI all individual items + age + gender, t0.848451.2512.3
SPI all individual items + age + gender, v0.837317.9326.5

a The analysis in the validation data set involved the score having been derived in the training data set, and thus it only used one degree of freedom.

Abbreviations: AUC, area under curve; AIC, Akaike information criterion; BIC, Bayesian information criterion.

Figure 1

Validation dataset: Score involving all SPI items, age, and gender. Score involving SPI total, age and gender, and original SPI total score.

Table 5

Extended model training data set.

Extended model: SPI all individual items, age, and gender AUC = 0.842Medical in-patients training dataset (n = 814)
CoefficientsSig.
Activity−0.0110.957
Body care, upper body0.0460.895
Body care, lower body−0.3040.429
Dress/undress upper body−0.0990.781
Dress/undress lower body−0.6610.105
Food intake−0.4960.093
Drink intake0.9720.005
Urine excretion−0.2290.248
Stool excretion0.0440.849
Acquire knowledge−0.5370.005
Age (centered around 65 years)0.0240.013
Gender0.6660.010
Constant−0.5770.606
Language: English, German
Page range: 59 - 66
Submitted on: Mar 19, 2022
Accepted on: May 5, 2022
Published on: Jul 13, 2022
Published by: ZHAW Zurich University of Applied Sciences
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2022 Antoinette Conca, Daniel Koch, Katharina Regez, Alexander Kutz, Sebastian Haubitz, Philipp Schuetz, Beat Mueller, Christian Schindler, Rebecca Spirig, Heidi Petry, published by ZHAW Zurich University of Applied Sciences
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.