Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Interrelation Between the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights and the Schengen Agreement: The Ne Bis in Idem Example Through the CJEU Case Law Cover

The Interrelation Between the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights and the Schengen Agreement: The Ne Bis in Idem Example Through the CJEU Case Law

Open Access
|Mar 2022

References

  1. BESSELINK, Leonard F. M. A Composite European Constitution/Een Samengestelde Europese Constitutie. Groningen: Europa Law Publishing, 2007.
  2. BESSELINK, Leonard F. M. The Member States, the National Constitutions and the Scope of the Charter. Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, 2001, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 68–80.10.1177/1023263X0100800105
  3. VAN BOCKEL, Bas. The Ne Bis In Idem Principle in EU Law. Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International, 2010.
  4. C-486/14 Kossowski, 29 June 2016.
  5. C-129/14 PPU Spasic, 27 May 2014.
  6. C-617/10 Akerberg Fransson, 26 February 2013.
  7. C-298/07 Bourquain, 11 December 2008.
  8. Joined Cases C-187/01 and C-385/01 Gözütok and Brügge, 11 February 2003.
  9. C-4/73 Nold vs. Commission of the European Communities, 14 May 1974.
  10. C-11/70 Internationale Handelsgesellschaft, 17 December 1970.
  11. C-29/69 Stauder vs. City of Ulm, 12 November 1969.
  12. CHALMERS, Damian, DAVIES, Gareth, MONTI, Giorgio. European Union Law: Text and Materials. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019.10.1017/9781108654173
  13. Commission of the European Communities. 2015. Green Paper on Conflicts of Jurisdiction and the Principle of ne bis in idem in Criminal Proceedings, Brussels, 23.12.2005 COM (2005) 696 final.
  14. Commission Memorandum. 1979. Accession of the European Communities to the European Convention on Human Rights, Bulletin of the European Communities, Supplement 2/79.
  15. Commission Memorandum. 1976. The Protection of Fundamental Rights as Community Law is Created and Developed, Bulletin of the European Communities, Supplement 5/76.
  16. DOUGLAS-SCOTT, Sionaidh. Constitutional Law of the European Union. Essex: Pearson, 2002.
  17. ECKES, Christina, KONSTADINIDES, Theodore. Crime within the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice: a European Public Order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.10.1017/CBO9780511751219
  18. GROUSSOT, Xavier, AROLD LORENZ, Nina-Louisa, PETURSSON, Gunnar Thor. The Paradox of Human Rights Protection in Europe: Two Courts, One Goal? In ARNARDOTTIR, Oddny Mjoll, BUYSE, Antoine (eds.) Shifting Centres of Gravity in Human Rights Protection: Rethinking Relations between the ECHR, EU and National Legal Orders. London: Routledge, 2016.10.4324/9781315651125-2
  19. LASAGNI, Giulia, MIRANDOLA, Sofia. The European ne bis in idem at the Crossroads of Administrative and Criminal Law. Eucrim, 2019, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 126–135.10.30709/eucrim-2019-009
  20. LELIEUR, Juliette. “Transnationalising” Ne Bis In Idem: How the Rule of Ne Bis In Idem Reveals the Principle of Personal Legal Certainty. Utrecht Law Review, 2013, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 198–210.10.18352/ulr.250
  21. LUCHTMAN, Michiel. The ECJ’s Recent Case Law on Ne Bis in Idem: Implications for Law Enforcement in a Shared Legal Order. Common Market Law Review, 2018, vol. 55, no. 6, pp. 1717–1750.10.54648/COLA2018143
  22. MITSILEGAS, Valsamis, GIUFFRIDA, Fabio. Ne Bis in Idem. In SICURELLA, Rosaria, MITSILEGAS, Valsamis, PARIZOT, Raphaele, LUCIFORA, Annalisa (eds.) General Principles for a Common Criminal Law Framework in the EU: A Guide for Legal Practitioners. Milano: Giuffre Editore, 2018.
  23. MITSILEGAS, Valsamis. EU Criminal Law after Lisbon: Rights, Trust and the Transformation of Justice in Europe. Oxford – Portland: Hart Publishing, 2016.
  24. MUNIVRANA VAJDA, Maja. The Trust is not Blind – Reviewing the Idea of Mutual Trust in the EU in the Context of Conflicts of Jurisdiction and Ne Bis in Idem Principle. EU and Comparative Law Issues and Challenges Series, 2018, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 323–337.10.25234/eclic/7115
  25. PEERS, Steve, PRECHAL Sacha. Article 52 – Scope and Interpretation of Rights and Principles. In PEERS, Steve, HERVEY, Tamara, KENNER, Jeff, WARD, Angela (eds.) The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: a Commentary. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2014.10.5771/9783845259055
  26. PERNICE, Ingolf. The Treaty of Lisbon and Fundamental Rights. In GRILLER, Stefan, ZILLER, Jacques (eds.) The Lisbon Treaty: EU Constitutionalism without a Constitutional Treaty? Wien – New York: Springer, 2008.
  27. REDING, Viviane. On Substantive Criminal Law of the European Union. In KLIP, Andre (ed.) Substantive Criminal Law of the European Union. Antwepren – Apeldoorn – Portland: Maklu Publishers, 2011.
  28. ROSANO, Alessandro. Ne Bis Interpretatio In Idem? The Two Faces of the Ne Bis In Idem Principle in the Case Law of the European Court of Justice. German Law Journal, 2017, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 39–58.10.1017/S2071832200021866
  29. SIMONATO, Michele. Ne bis in idem in the EU: Two Important Questions for the CJEU (Opinion of the AG in C-486/14 Kussowski). [online]. Available: Accessed 25.03.2021.
  30. TUORI, Kaarlo. European Constitutionalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.10.1017/CBO9781316091883
  31. VERVAELE, John. Schengen and Charter-related ne bis in idem protection in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice: M and Zoran Spasic. Common Market Law Review, 2015, vol. 52, no. 5, pp. 1339–1360.10.54648/COLA2015106
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/iclr-2021-0012 | Journal eISSN: 2464-6601 | Journal ISSN: 12138770
Language: English
Page range: 29 - 42
Published on: Mar 29, 2022
Published by: Palacký University Olomouc
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2022 Konstantinos Margaritis, published by Palacký University Olomouc
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.