The Ship as an Extension of Flag State Territory and an Entity with Human Attributes – Is it Time to Jettison These Legal Fictions?

Gauci, Gotthard Mark

doi:10.2478/iclr-2021-0011

Abstract

This article questions the need for the use of two legal fictions in modern maritime law: that a vessel/ship can in certain instances be treated as an extension of flag state territory; that a vessel/ship is an entity with human attributes. The article addresses the first ‘fiction’ mainly in the context of applicable international law as well as English law; the second ‘fiction’ is addressed mainly in the context of English law although selective reference is made to both primary and secondary legal sources from the United States. The article concludes that the two fictions are only of limited value in modern maritime law.

References

BARNES, Richard. Refugee Law at Sea, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 2004, Vol. 53(1), pp. 47–77.10.1093/iclq/53.1.47
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
BUGLASS, Leslie, J. Marine Insurance and General Average in the United States, Third Edition, Maryland: Cornell Maritime Press, 1991.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
COLINVAUX, Raoul, P. Carriage of Goods by Sea, British Shipping Laws, Vol. 3, London: Stevens & Sons, 1963.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
CUMMING, Charles. The English High Court of Admiralty, 1992, Vol. 17, Tulane Maritime Law Journal, pp. 209–255.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
FOARD, James, T. A Treatise on the Law of Merchant Shipping and Freight, London: Stevens & Sons, 1880.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
GALLAGHER, Ann, T., DAVID, Fiona. The International Law of Migrant Smuggling, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2014.10.1017/CBO9781139059619
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
GAUCI, Gotthard. Compulsory Insurance under EC Directive 2009/20/EC – an adequate solution for victims, or is it also time for the abolition of maritime limitation of liability and the establishment of an international fund as an insurer of last resort? Journal of Maritime Law & Commerce, 2014, Vol. 45(1), pp.77–96.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
GAUCI, Gotthard. Limitation of Liability in Maritime law: An Anachronism? Marine Policy, 1995, Vol. 19(1), pp. 65–74.10.1016/0308-597X(95)92573-P
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
GAUCI, Gotthard, AQUILINA, Kevin. The Legal Fiction of a Genuine Link as a Requirement for the Grant of Nationality to Ships and Humans – The Triumph of Formality over Substance? (2017) 17(1) International and Comparative Law Review, 2017, pp. 167–191.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
GILMORE, Grant, BLACK, Charles, L. The Law of Admiralty, 2^nd edition, St Paul, MN: Foundation Press, 1975.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
GODDARD, Kathleen, S. Marriages at Sea: The Captain’s Powers, Past, Present and Future, Lloyds Maritime and Commercial Law Quarterly, 2002, pp. 498–519.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
GOLD, Edgar, et al. Maritime Law. Ontario: Irwin Law 2003.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
HEBERT, Paul, Macarius. Origin and Nature of Maritime Liens, 1929–30, Vol. 4:3, Tulane Law Review, pp. 381–408.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
HELMERSEN, Sondre, Torp. The Sui Generis Nature of Flag State Jurisdiction. [online] Available at https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/64696/Helmersen-Flag-state.pdf?sequence=4&isAllowed=y. Accessed: 12.01.2021.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
HUNTER, W.A. A Systematic and Historical Exposition of Roman Law, Fourth Edition, London: Sweet & Maxwell, 1803.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
HUTTON, Neill. The Origin, Development, and Future of Maritime Liens and the Action in Rem, Tulane Maritime Law Journal, 2003, Vol. 28, pp. 81–112.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
KLEPP, Silja. A Double Bind: Malta and the Rescue of Unwanted Migrants at Sea, a Legal Anthropological Perspective on the Humanitarian Law of the Sea, International Journal of Refugee Law,2011, Vol. 23. No. 3, pp. 538–557.10.1093/ijrl/eer017
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
LAMBERT MEARS, Thomas. The History of the Admiralty Jurisdiction, Select Essays in Anglo-American Legal History, Vol. 2 1908, pp. 312–364.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
LAING, Lionel, H. Historic Origins of Admiralty Jurisdiction in England, Michigan Law Review, 1946, Vol. 45(2), pp. 163–182.10.2307/1283556
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
LIND, Douglas. The Pragmatic Value of Legal Fictions. In DEL MAR, Maksymilian, TWINING, W. (eds.). Legal Fictions in Theory and Practice, Switzerland: Springer 2015, pp. 83–109.10.1007/978-3-319-09232-4_5
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
LIND, Douglas. Pragmatism and Anthropomorphism: Reconceiving the Doctrine of Personality of the Ship, University of San Francisco Maritime Law Journal, 2009, Vol.22(1), pp. 39–121.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
LOWNDES, Richard. The Law of General Average – English and Foreign, London: Stevens & Sons, 1873.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
MCGUFFIE, Kenneth, et al. Admiralty Practice, Vol 1, British Shipping Laws, London: Stevens & Sons, 1964.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
MEESON, Nigel. Admiralty Jurisdiction and Practice, Second Edition, London: LLP, 2000.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
MEESON, Nigel, KIMBALL, John. Admiralty Jurisdiction and Practice, 5th Edition, London: LLP, 2017.10.4324/9781315689463
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
ROSCOE, Edward, Stanley. A Treatise on the Jurisdiction and Practice of the Admiralty Division of the High Court of Justice, London: Stevens and Sons, 1882.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
RUIZ ABOU-NIGM, Veronica. The Arrest of Ships in Private International Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
RUTHERGLEN, George. The Contemporary Justification for Maritime Arrest and Attachment, (1989) 40 William and Mary Law Review, 1989, Vol. 40, pp. 541–579.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
RYAN, Edward, F. Admiralty Jurisdiction and the Maritime Lien: An Historical Perspective, Western Ontario Law Review, 1968, Vol. 7, pp. 173–200.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
TANAKA, Yoshifumi. The International Law of the Sea, Third Edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
TEARE, Sir Nigel. The Admiralty action in rem and the House of Lords, Lloyd’s Maritime and Commercial Law Quarterly, 1998, pp. 33–42.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
TESTA, David. Safeguarding Human Life and Ensuring Respect for Fundamental Human Rights: A Consequential Approach to the Disembarkation of Persons Rescued at Sea, Ocean Yearbook, 2014, Vol. 28, pp.555–609.10.1163/22116001-02801020
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
TETLEY, William. Maritime Liens and Claims, London: Business Law Communications Ltd, 1985.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
WARNER-KRAMER, Deirdre, M., KANTY, Krista. Stateless Vessels: The Current International Regime and a New Approach, (2000) Ocean & Coastal L.J., 2000, Vol. 5(2), pp. 227–243.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
WISWALL, Francis, L. The Development of Admiralty Jurisdiction and Practice since 1800, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1970.10.1017/CBO9780511897061
Search in Google Scholar Back to article

The Ship as an Extension of Flag State Territory and an Entity with Human Attributes – Is it Time to Jettison These Legal Fictions?

Abstract

Paradigm

My account