Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Europeanisation effects in the court jurisprudence Cover

Europeanisation effects in the court jurisprudence

By: Katalin Gombos  
Open Access
|Oct 2019

References

  1. ARNULL, Anthony: ‘The European Union and its Court of Justice’. Oxford European Union Law Library, Oxford, 2006.10.1093/oso/9780199258840.001.0001
  2. BANKOWSKI, Zeno, MACCORMICK, Neil (eds). The Judicial Application of Law. Dordrecht; Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers1992.
  3. BECK, Gunnar. The Legal Reasoning of the Court of Justice of the EU. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2012.
  4. BLECKMANN, Albert. Die Rolle der richterlichen Rechtschöpfung im Europäischen Gemeinschaftsrecht. In LÜKE, Gerhard (ed.). Rechtsvergleichung, Europarecht und Staatenintegration, Gedächtnisschrift für L.J. Constantinesco, Köln: Carl Heymanns Verlag, 1983.
  5. BLECKMANN, Albert: Gleichbehandlung von Männern und Frauen hinsichtlich des Zugangs zur Beschäftigung. Der Betrieb 1984.
  6. BOBEK, Michal: Why There is no Principle of ‘Procedural Autonomy’ of the Member States. In DE WITTE, Bruno, MICKLITZ Hans-W. (eds.). The European Court of Justice and autonomy of the Memeber States. Antwerpen: Intersentia, 2012.
  7. BÖRZEL, Tanja A. – RISSE, Thomas: Conceptualizing the Domestic Impact of Europe. In FEATHERSTONE, Kevin. – RADAELLI, Claudio M. (eds). The Politics of Europeanization, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.10.1093/0199252092.003.0003
  8. CAPORASO, James A. – JUPILLE, Joseph: The Europeanization of Gender Equality Policy and Domestic Structural Change. In CAPORASO, James A. – COWLES, Maria Green – RISSEThomas (eds.). Transforming Europe. Europeanization and Domestic Change, Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press 2001.
  9. EVERLING, Ulrich. Der Gerichtshof als Entscheidungsinstanz – Probleme der europäis-chen Rechtsprechung aus richterlicher Sicht. In SCHWARZE, Jürgen (ed.). Der Europäische Gerichtshof als Verfassungsgericht und Rechtsschutzinstanz. Baden-Baden: Nomos, 1983.
  10. GALETTA, Diana-Urania: Procedural Autonomy of EU Member States: Paradise Lost? Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 2010.10.1007/978-3-642-12547-8
  11. GÜNDISCH, Jürgen, WIENHUES, Sigrid. Rechtsschutz in der Europäischen Union. Ein Leitfaden für die Praxis. Stuttgart-Müchen-Hannover-Berlin-Weimar-Dresden Stuttgart: Richard Boorberg Verlag, 2003.
  12. HALL, Stephen. The Persistent Spectre: Natural Law, International Order and the Limits of Legal Positivism. European Journal of International Law, 2001, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 269–307, Available: https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/12.2.26910.1093/ejil/12.2.269
  13. IDOT, Laurence. Deux précisions sur la directive relative aux agents commerciaux. Europe. Actualité du Droit de l’Uunion Européenne. 2006, vol. 16. no. 5. pp. 28–29.
  14. KELSEN, Hans. Pure Theory of Law. Translation from the Second German Edition by Max Knight. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1967.
  15. KUTSCHER, Hans. Thesen zu den Methoden der Auslegung des Gemeinschaftsrechts aus der Sicht eines Richters. In Gerichsthof der EK. Luxembourg: Begegnung von Justiz und Hochschule, 1976, LASOK, K.P.E, LASOK, Dominik. Law and institutions of the European Union. London: Butterworths, 2001.
  16. LENAERTS, Koen, GUTIÉRREZ-FONS, José A. To say what the law of the EU is: methods of interpretation and the European Court of Justice. European University Institute Working Paper AEL/9. 2013. Available: http://hdl.handle.net/1814/28339
  17. LENAERTS, Koen. L’égalité de traitement en droit communautaire. un principe unique aux apparences multiples. Cahiers de Droit Européen, 1991, no. 1–2. pp. 3–41.
  18. LENAERTS, Koen. The Court of Justice of the European Union and the Protection of Fundamental Rights. Polish Yearbook of International Law, 2011, vol. 31, pp. 79–106.
  19. LENAERTS, Koen. The European Court of First Instance: Ten years of interaction with the Court of Justice. In: O’KEEFFE; David, BAVASSO, Antonio (eds.). Liber amicorum in honour of Lord Slynn of Hadley. Vol. 1: Judicial Review in European Union Law. The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2000.
  20. MACCORMICK, D. Neil, SUMMERS, Robert S. Interpreting statutes: A Comparative Study. New York: Routledge, 2016.10.4324/9781315251882
  21. MURRAY, John L.Methods of Interpretation – Comparative Law Method. Actes du colloque pour le cinquantième anniversaire des traités de Rome: l’influence du droit national et de la jurisprudence des juridictions des états membres sur l’interpretation du droit communautaire 1957–2007 Luxembourg: Office des publications officielles des Communautés européennes, 2007.
  22. NOWAK, Janek, Tomasz (ed). EU Procedural Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.
  23. PAPP, Tekla (Eds.) Atipikus szerződések.(Atypical contracts), Budapest: Opten, 2015.
  24. SCHERMERS, Henry G. WAELBROECK, Denis F. Judicial Protection in the European Union. The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2001.
  25. STONE SWEET, Alec. The judicial construction of Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.10.1093/019927553X.001.0001
  26. TATHAM, Allan Francis. EC Law in practice: A case-study approach. Budapest: HVGORAC, 2006.
  27. VOGENAUER, Stefan – WEATHERILL, Stephen (eds). General Principles of Law. European and Comparative Perspectives. Oxford: Hart, 2017.
  28. WESSELS, Wolfgang – ROMETSCH, Dietrich (eds.). The European Union and Member States. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1996.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/iclr-2018-0059 | Journal eISSN: 2464-6601 | Journal ISSN: 12138770
Language: English
Page range: 261 - 275
Published on: Oct 7, 2019
Published by: Palacký University Olomouc
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2019 Katalin Gombos, published by Palacký University Olomouc
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.