Europeanisation effects in the court jurisprudence

Gombos, Katalin

doi:10.2478/iclr-2018-0059

Abstract

Nowadays, the notion of Europeanisation, which has formerly been used as a description for multi-level governance, prevails also in the area of law. Legal Europeanisation is a process that appears in the interactions of legal systems of the Member States between one another, as well as between European law and the laws of the Member States. Its main area is the appearance of European legal elements in the legal practice of Member States. At some point, the court practice of Member States may affect European law, as well. Due to the occurrence of comparative law elements, interactions can be observed between courts in the EU. According to our basic premise, the interactions can be best observed through the practice of different courts. This article aims to prove this premise by establishing different guiding principles through further Hungarian court decisions in the field of civil law.

References

ARNULL, Anthony: ‘The European Union and its Court of Justice’. Oxford European Union Law Library, Oxford, 2006.10.1093/oso/9780199258840.001.0001
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
BANKOWSKI, Zeno, MACCORMICK, Neil (eds). The Judicial Application of Law. Dordrecht; Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers1992.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
BECK, Gunnar. The Legal Reasoning of the Court of Justice of the EU. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2012.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
BLECKMANN, Albert. Die Rolle der richterlichen Rechtschöpfung im Europäischen Gemeinschaftsrecht. In LÜKE, Gerhard (ed.). Rechtsvergleichung, Europarecht und Staatenintegration, Gedächtnisschrift für L.J. Constantinesco, Köln: Carl Heymanns Verlag, 1983.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
BLECKMANN, Albert: Gleichbehandlung von Männern und Frauen hinsichtlich des Zugangs zur Beschäftigung. Der Betrieb 1984.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
BOBEK, Michal: Why There is no Principle of ‘Procedural Autonomy’ of the Member States. In DE WITTE, Bruno, MICKLITZ Hans-W. (eds.). The European Court of Justice and autonomy of the Memeber States. Antwerpen: Intersentia, 2012.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
BÖRZEL, Tanja A. – RISSE, Thomas: Conceptualizing the Domestic Impact of Europe. In FEATHERSTONE, Kevin. – RADAELLI, Claudio M. (eds). The Politics of Europeanization, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.10.1093/0199252092.003.0003
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
CAPORASO, James A. – JUPILLE, Joseph: The Europeanization of Gender Equality Policy and Domestic Structural Change. In CAPORASO, James A. – COWLES, Maria Green – RISSEThomas (eds.). Transforming Europe. Europeanization and Domestic Change, Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press 2001.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
EVERLING, Ulrich. Der Gerichtshof als Entscheidungsinstanz – Probleme der europäis-chen Rechtsprechung aus richterlicher Sicht. In SCHWARZE, Jürgen (ed.). Der Europäische Gerichtshof als Verfassungsgericht und Rechtsschutzinstanz. Baden-Baden: Nomos, 1983.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
GALETTA, Diana-Urania: Procedural Autonomy of EU Member States: Paradise Lost? Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 2010.10.1007/978-3-642-12547-8
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
GÜNDISCH, Jürgen, WIENHUES, Sigrid. Rechtsschutz in der Europäischen Union. Ein Leitfaden für die Praxis. Stuttgart-Müchen-Hannover-Berlin-Weimar-Dresden Stuttgart: Richard Boorberg Verlag, 2003.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
HALL, Stephen. The Persistent Spectre: Natural Law, International Order and the Limits of Legal Positivism. European Journal of International Law, 2001, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 269–307, Available: https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/12.2.26910.1093/ejil/12.2.269
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
IDOT, Laurence. Deux précisions sur la directive relative aux agents commerciaux. Europe. Actualité du Droit de l’Uunion Européenne. 2006, vol. 16. no. 5. pp. 28–29.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
KELSEN, Hans. Pure Theory of Law. Translation from the Second German Edition by Max Knight. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1967.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
KUTSCHER, Hans. Thesen zu den Methoden der Auslegung des Gemeinschaftsrechts aus der Sicht eines Richters. In Gerichsthof der EK. Luxembourg: Begegnung von Justiz und Hochschule, 1976, LASOK, K.P.E, LASOK, Dominik. Law and institutions of the European Union. London: Butterworths, 2001.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
LENAERTS, Koen, GUTIÉRREZ-FONS, José A. To say what the law of the EU is: methods of interpretation and the European Court of Justice. European University Institute Working Paper AEL/9. 2013. Available: http://hdl.handle.net/1814/28339
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
LENAERTS, Koen. L’égalité de traitement en droit communautaire. un principe unique aux apparences multiples. Cahiers de Droit Européen, 1991, no. 1–2. pp. 3–41.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
LENAERTS, Koen. The Court of Justice of the European Union and the Protection of Fundamental Rights. Polish Yearbook of International Law, 2011, vol. 31, pp. 79–106.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
LENAERTS, Koen. The European Court of First Instance: Ten years of interaction with the Court of Justice. In: O’KEEFFE; David, BAVASSO, Antonio (eds.). Liber amicorum in honour of Lord Slynn of Hadley. Vol. 1: Judicial Review in European Union Law. The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2000.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
MACCORMICK, D. Neil, SUMMERS, Robert S. Interpreting statutes: A Comparative Study. New York: Routledge, 2016.10.4324/9781315251882
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
MURRAY, John L.Methods of Interpretation – Comparative Law Method. Actes du colloque pour le cinquantième anniversaire des traités de Rome: l’influence du droit national et de la jurisprudence des juridictions des états membres sur l’interpretation du droit communautaire 1957–2007 Luxembourg: Office des publications officielles des Communautés européennes, 2007.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
NOWAK, Janek, Tomasz (ed). EU Procedural Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
PAPP, Tekla (Eds.) Atipikus szerződések.(Atypical contracts), Budapest: Opten, 2015.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
SCHERMERS, Henry G. WAELBROECK, Denis F. Judicial Protection in the European Union. The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2001.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
STONE SWEET, Alec. The judicial construction of Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.10.1093/019927553X.001.0001
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
TATHAM, Allan Francis. EC Law in practice: A case-study approach. Budapest: HVGORAC, 2006.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
VOGENAUER, Stefan – WEATHERILL, Stephen (eds). General Principles of Law. European and Comparative Perspectives. Oxford: Hart, 2017.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
WESSELS, Wolfgang – ROMETSCH, Dietrich (eds.). The European Union and Member States. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1996.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article

Europeanisation effects in the court jurisprudence

Abstract

Paradigm

My account