Is conventionally calculated anchor-based minimum clinically important difference value catches the real clinical increment? Determining the situations that make the answer “no” by a simulation study Cover

.blurhash-client-img { display: none !important; }

Is conventionally calculated anchor-based minimum clinically important difference value catches the real clinical increment? Determining the situations that make the answer “no” by a simulation study

Proceedings of the International Conference on Applied Statistics

Volume 1 (2019): Issue 1 (October 2019)

By: Selcen Yüksel, Pervin Demir and Afra Alkan

Open Access

|Feb 2020

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/icas-2019-0046 | Journal eISSN: 2668-6309

Journal RSS Feed

Language: English

Page range: 522 - 528

Published on: Feb 13, 2020

Published by: Grupul de Econometrie Aplicata

In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

Keywords:

minimum clinically important difference,

balanced design,

unbalanced design

Related subjects:

Computer sciences,

Artificial intelligence,

Business and economics,

Political economics,

Macroeconomics,

Mathematics and statistics for economists,

© 2020 Selcen Yüksel, Pervin Demir, Afra Alkan, published by Grupul de Econometrie Aplicata
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Previous article Volume 1 (2019): Issue 1 (October 2019)