Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Is conventionally calculated anchor-based minimum clinically important difference value catches the real clinical increment? Determining the situations that make the answer “no” by a simulation study Cover

Is conventionally calculated anchor-based minimum clinically important difference value catches the real clinical increment? Determining the situations that make the answer “no” by a simulation study

Proceedings of the International Conference on Applied Statistics
Volume 1 (2019): Issue 1 (October 2019)
By: Selcen Yüksel,  Pervin Demir and  Afra Alkan  
Open Access
|Feb 2020

Authors

Selcen Yüksel

selcenpehlivan@gmail.com

Ankara Yildirim Beyazit University, Ankara, Turkey

Pervin Demir

pervin.demr@gmail.com

Ankara Yildirim Beyazit University, Ankara, Turkey

Afra Alkan

afra.alkan@gmail.com

Ankara Yildirim Beyazit University, Ankara, Turkey
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/icas-2019-0046 | Journal eISSN: 2668-6309
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 522 - 528
Published on: Feb 13, 2020
Published by: Grupul de Econometrie Aplicata
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year
Keywords:
minimum clinically important difference,
ROC,
simulation,
balanced design,
unbalanced design
Related subjects:
Computer sciences,
Artificial intelligence,
Business and economics,
Political economics,
Macroeconomics,
Mathematics and statistics for economists,
Statistics,
Econometrics

© 2020 Selcen Yüksel, Pervin Demir, Afra Alkan, published by Grupul de Econometrie Aplicata
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 1 (2019): Issue 1 (October 2019)