AusBrown: A new diachronic corpus of Australian English

Collins, Peter; Yao, Xinyue

doi:10.2478/icame-2019-0001

Abstract

This paper presents a newly-compiled diachronic corpus of Australian English (AusBrown). With four sampling time points (1931, 1961, 1991 and 2006), Aus-Brown is designed to match the current suite of British and American ‘Brown-family’ corpora in both sampling year and design. We provide details of the composition and compilation of AusBrown, and explore the broader context of its ‘Brown-family background’ and of complementary Australian corpora. We also overview research based on the Australian corpora presented, including several AusBrown-based papers.

References

Aarts, Bas, Joanne Close, Geoffrey Leech and Sean Wallis (eds.). 2013. The verb phrase in English: Investigating recent language change with corpora. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139060998
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ahmad, Kurshid and Greville Corbett. 1987. The Melbourne-Surrey Corpus. ICAME Journal 11: 39–43.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Baker, Paul. 2009. The BE06 Corpus of British English and recent language change. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 14: 312–337.10.1075/ijcl.14.3.02bak
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad and Edward Finegan. 1999. Longman grammar of spoken and written English. London: Longman.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Collins, Peter. 1988. The semantics of some modals in contemporary Australian English. Australian Journal of Linguistics 8: 261–286.10.1080/07268608808599400
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Collins, Peter. 1991a. Will and shall in Australian English. In S. Johansson and A-B. Stenström (eds.). English computer corpora, 181–200. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110865967.181
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Collins, Peter. 1991b. The modals of obligation and necessity: Some Australian findings. In K. Aijmer and B. Altenberg (eds.). English corpus linguistics: Studies in honour of Jan Svartvik, 145–165. London: Longman.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Collins, Peter. 1992. Cleft existentials in English. Language Sciences 14: 419–433.10.1016/0388-0001(92)90024-9
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Collins, Peter. 1994a. Extraposition in English. Functions of Language 1: 1–18. Collins, Peter. 1994b. The structure of English comparative clauses. English Studies 75: 157–165.10.1080/00138389408598907
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Collins, Peter. 1995. The indirect object construction in English: An informational approach. Linguistics 33: 35–49.10.1515/ling.1995.33.1.35
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Collins, Peter. 1996. Get-passives in English. World Englishes 15: 43–56.10.1111/j.1467-971X.1996.tb00091.x
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Collins, Peter. 2004. Let-imperatives in English. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 9: 299–320.10.1075/ijcl.9.2.07col
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Collins, Peter. 2005a. Exclamative clauses in English. Word 56: 1–18.10.1080/00437956.2005.11432550
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Collins, Peter. 2005b. The modals and quasi-modals of obligation and necessity in Australian English and other Englishes. English World Wide 26: 249–273.10.1075/eww.26.3.02col
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Collins, Peter. 2007. Can/could and may/might in British, American and Australian English: A corpus-based account. World Englishes 26: 471–488.10.1111/j.1467-971X.2007.00523.x
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Collins, Peter. 2008. The progressive in World Englishes: A corpus-based study. Australian Journal of Linguistics 28: 225–249.10.1080/07268600802308782
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Collins, Peter. 2009a. Modals and quasi-modals in English. Amsterdam: Rodopi.10.1163/9789042029095
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Collins, Peter. 2009b. Modals and quasi-modals in world Englishes. World Englishes 28: 281–292.10.1111/j.1467-971X.2009.01593.x
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Collins, Peter. 2010. Information-packaging constructions in some new Englishes. In S. Slembrouck, M. van Herreweghe and M. Taverniers (eds.). Studies in honour of Anne-Marie Simon-Vandenbergen, 105–116. Ghent: Academia Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Collins, Peter. 2011. Singular agreement in there-existentials: An intervarietal corpus- based study. English World-Wide 33(1): 53–68.10.1075/eww.33.1.03col
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Collins, Peter. 2014. Quasi-modals and modals in Australian English fiction 1800–1999, with comparisons across British and American English. Journal of English Language and Linguistics 42: 7–30.10.1177/0075424213512857
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Collins, Peter. 2015a. Grammatical change in English world-wide. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/scl.67
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Collins, Peter. 2015b. Diachronic variation in the grammar of Australian English: Corpus-based explorations. In P. Collins (ed.) (2015a), 15–42.10.1075/scl.67.02col
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Collins, Peter. 2015c. Recent diachronic change in the progressive in Philippine English. In P. Collins (ed.) (2015a), 271–296.10.1075/scl.67.12col
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Collins, Peter. 2016. Grammatical change in the verb phrase in contemporary Philippine English. Asiatic 10: 50–67.10.31436/asiatic.v10i2.894
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Collins, Peter and Ariane Borlongan. 2017. Has Philippine English attained linguistic independence? The grammatical evidence. The Philippine ESL Journal 19: 10–24.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Collins, Peter, Ariane Borlongan, Joo-Hyuk Lim and Xinyue Yao. 2014. The subjunctive mood in Philippine English: A diachronic perspective. In S. Pfenninger, O. Timofeeva, A. Gardner, A. Honkapohja, M. Hundt and D. Schreier (eds.). Contact, variation, and change in the history of English, 259–280. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.159.13col
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Collins, Peter, Ariane Borlongan and Xinyue Yao. 2014. Modality in Philippine English: A diachronic study. Journal of English Linguistics 42: 68–88.10.1177/0075424213511462
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Collins, Peter and Pam Peters. 1988. The Australian Corpus Project. In M. Kytö, O. Ihalainen and M. Rissanen (eds.). Corpus linguistics, hard and soft, 103–120. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Collins, Peter and Pam Peters. 2004. Australian English morphology and syntax. In B. Kortmann (ed.). Varieties of English. 2 vols. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Collins, Peter and Pam Peters. 2008. Australian English morphology and syntax. In K.Burridge and B. Kortmann (eds.). Varieties of English 3: The Pacific and Australia, 341–361. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110208412.2.341
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Collins, Peter and Xinyue Yao. 2011a. Modals and quasi-modals in New Englishes. In M. Hundt and U. Güt (eds.). Mapping unity and diversity in New Englishes, 35–53. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/veaw.g43.02col
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Collins, Peter and Xinyue Yao. 2011b. Developments in the verbal systems of the “old” and “new” Englishes. In C. Gitsaki and R. Baldauf (eds.). The future of applied linguistics: Local and global perspectives, 328–349. Cam-bridge Scholars Publishing: Newcastle, UK.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Collins Peter and Xinyue Yao. 2014. Grammatical change in the verb phrase in Australian English: A corpus-based study. Australian Journal of Linguistics 34: 496–514.10.1080/07268602.2014.929087
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Collins Peter and Xinyue Yao. 2018. Colloquialisation and the evolution of Australian English: A cross-varietal and cross-generic study of Australian, British and American English from 1931 to 2006. English World-Wide 39: 253–277.10.1075/eww.00014.col
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Collins, Peter, Xinyue Yao and Ariane Borlongan. 2014. Relative clauses in Philippine English: A diachronic perspective. In L. Vandelanotte, K. Davidse, C. Gentens and D. Kimps (eds.). Corpus interrogation and grammatical patterns, 123–146. Amsterdam: Rodopi.10.1163/9789401211130_008
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Collins, Peter, Xinyue Yao, Haidee Kruger, Adam Smith and Minna Korhonen. N.d. (Ms). Diachronic register change: A corpus-based study of change in four registers in Australian English from 1931 to 2006, with comparisons across British and American English.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Francis, W.N. and H. Kučera. 1964. Manual of information to accompany A Standard Corpus of Present-Day Edited American English, for use with digital computers. Providence: Rhode Island Department of Linguistics, Brown University. Available at http://clu.uni.no/icame/manuals/BROWN/INDEX.HTM.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Fritz, Clemens. 2006. Resilient or yielding? Features of IrE syntax and aspect in early Australia. In T. Nevalainen, J. Klemola and M. Laitinen (eds.). Types of variation: Diachronic, dialectal and typological, 280–301. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.76.15fri
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Fritz, Clemens. 2007a. From Plato to Aristotle – investigating early Australian English. Australian Journal of Linguistics 24: 57–97.10.1080/0726860032000203218
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Fritz, Clemens. 2007b. From English in Australia to Australian English: 1788–1900. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.10.3726/978-3-653-01830-1
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Green, Elizabeth and Pam Peters. 1991. The Australian corpus project and Australian English. ICAME Journal 15: 37–53.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hundt, Marianne and Christian Mair. 1991. ‘Agile’ and ‘uptight’ genres: The corpus-based approach to language in progress. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 4: 221–242.10.1075/ijcl.4.2.02hun
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hundt, Marianne. 2012. Towards a corpus of early written New Zealand English – news from Erewhon? Te Reo 55: 51–74.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Johansson, Stig, in collaboration with Helen Goodluck. Nd. Manual of information to accompany the Lancaster-Oslo/Bergen Corpus of British English, for use with digital computers. Oslo: Department of English, University of Oslo.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Jose, Nicholas. 2009. Macquarie PEN anthology of Australian literature. Sydney: Angus and Robertson.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kruger, Haidee and Adam Smith. 2018. Colloquialisation versus densification in Australian English: A multidimensional analysis of the Australian Diachronic Hansard Corpus (ADHC). Australian Journal of Linguistics 38(3): 293–328.10.1080/07268602.2018.1470452
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Leech Geoffrey and Stig Johansson. 2009. The coming of ICAME. ICAME Journal 33: 5–20.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Leech, Geoffrey, Marianne Hundt, Christian Mair and Nicholas Smith. 2009. Change in contemporary English: A grammatical study. Cambridge: Cam-bridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511642210
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Moore, Bruce. 2008. Speaking our language: The story of Australian English. Sydney: Oxford University Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Noël, Dirk, Johan Van der Auwera and Bertus Van Rooy (eds.). 2014. Special issue of Journal of English Linguistics (Volume 42, “Diachronic Approaches to Modality in World Englishes”).10.1177/0075424213512655
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Peters, Pam. 1987. Towards a corpus of Australian English. ICAME Journal 11: 1–13. Peters, Pam. 1998. In quest of international English: Mapping the levels of regional divergence. In A. Renouf (ed.). Explorations in corpus linguistics, 281–292. Amsterdam: Rodopi.10.1163/9789004653658_024
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Peters, Pam. 1993. Corpus evidence on some points of usage. In J. Aarts, P. de Haan and N. Oostdijk (eds.). English language corpora: Design, analysis and exploitation, 247–256. Amsterdam: Rodopi.10.1163/9789004653559_019
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Peters, Pam. 1994. American and British influence in Australian verb morphology. In U. Fries, G. Tottie and P. Schneider (eds.). Creating and using English language corpora, 149–158. Amsterdam: Rodopi.10.1163/9789004652804_015
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Peters, Pam. 1996. Comparative insights into comparison. World Englishes 15: 57–68.10.1111/j.1467-971X.1996.tb00092.x
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Peters, Pam. 1998. The survival of the subjunctive: Evidence of its use in Australia and elsewhere. English World-Wide 19: 87–102.10.1075/eww.19.1.06pet
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Peters, Pam. 2001. Corpus evidence on Australian style and usage. In D. Blair and P. Collins (eds.). English in Australia, 163–178. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/veaw.g26.15pet
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Peters, Pam. 2007. Cambridge guide to Australian English usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511481253
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Peters, Pam. 2008. Patterns of negation: The relationship between NO and NOT in regional varieties of English. In T. Nevalainen, I. Taavitsainen, P. Pahta and M. Korhonen (eds.). The dynamics of linguistic variation: Corpus evidence on English past and present, 147–162. Amsterdam, John Benjamins.10.1075/silv.2.13pet
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Peters, Pam. 2015. Dual adverbs in Australian English. In P. Collins (ed.) (2015a), 179–204.10.1075/scl.67.08pet
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Peters, Pam and Peter Collins. 2012. Colloquial Australian English. In B. Kortmann and K. Lunkenheimer (eds.). The Mouton world atlas of variation in English, 585–595. De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110280128.585
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Peters, Pam, Peter Collins, and Adam Smith. 2009. Comparative studies in Australian and New Zealand English: Grammar and beyond. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/veaw.g39
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Peters, Pam, Peter Collins, David Blair and Alison Brierley. 1988. The Australian Corpus Project: Findings on some functional variants in the Australian press. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 11: 20–30.10.1075/aral.11.1.03pet
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Rodriguez-Louro, Celeste. 2015. The evolution of epistemic marking in West Australian English. In P. Collins (ed.) (2015a), 205–219.10.1075/scl.67.09rod
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Schneider, Edgar. 2007. Post-colonial English: Varieties around the World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511618901
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Shastri, S.V. in collaboration with C.T. Patilkulkarni and G.S. Shastri. 1986. Manual of information to accompany the Kolhapur Corpus of Indian English, for use with digital computers. Kolhapur: Department of English, Shivaji University.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Yao, Xinyue. 2015. The present perfect and the preterite in Australian English: A diachronic perspective. In P. Collins (ed.) (2015a), 247–268.10.1075/scl.67.11yao
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Yao, Xinyue and Peter Collins. 2012. The present perfect in world Englishes. World Englishes 31: 386–403.10.1111/j.1467-971X.2012.01756.x
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Yao, Xinyue and Peter Collins. 2018. Exploring grammatical colloquialisation in non-native English: A case study of Philippine English. English Language and Linguistics 22/3:457–482.10.1017/S1360674316000599
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Yao, Xinyue and Peter Collins. Forthcoming. Developments in Australian English grammar from 1931 to 2006: An aggregate approach to dialectal variation and change. Journal of English Linguistics.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article

AusBrown: A new diachronic corpus of Australian English

Abstract

Paradigm

My account