Fig. 1.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 4.

Overall prevalence of H_ contortus in goats and sheep in Malakand division_
| Host | Sample | Positive | Percentage | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Goats | 398 | 96 | 24.12 | 0.51379ns |
| Sheep | 480 | 125 | 26.04 | |
| Total | 878 | 221 | 25.17 |
Morphometric measurement (in mm) of H_ contortus isolated from goats and sheep_
| Particulars | Male worms (n= 50) | Female worms (n= 76) |
|---|---|---|
| Body length (mm) | 11.9 – 13.8 | 15 – 23.8 |
| Body width (mm) | 0.23 – 0.38 | 0.29 – 0.38 |
| Cervical papillae (mm) | 0.28 – 0.38 | 0.24 – 0.42 |
| Spicule length (mm) | 0.44 – 0.78 | – |
| Length of esophagus (mm) | 0.61 – 0.92 | 0.72 – 1.22 |
| Gubernaculum length (mm) | 0.09 – 0.18 | – |
| Distance from vulva to posterior end (mm) | – | 0.68 – 0.82 |
| Distance from Anus to posterior end (mm) | – | 0.29 – 0.35 |
Epidemiological spectrum of Haemochus contortus among sheep and goat populations in Pakistan_
| Study area | Host | Sample type | Method | Samples | Positive | Prev. % | QAS | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KPK | Goat & Sheep | Fecal | Mic & Mol | 180 | 46 | 25.55 | 5 | Ahmad et al., 2024 |
| Sindh | Goat & Sheep | Fecal | Mic & Mol | 800 | 88 | 11 | 4 | Memon et al., 2024 |
| KPK | Goat & Sheep | Fecal | Mic, Floa & Sed | 1340 | 312 | 23.28 | 4 | Irshad et al., 2023 |
| KPK | Goat & Sheep | Fecal | Floa & MM | 400 | 57 | 14.25 | 5 | Khan et al., 2022 |
| KPK | Goat & Sheep | Blood & Fecal | Mic | 300 | 56 | 18.66 | 2 | Ali et al., 2022 |
| KPK | Goat & Sheep | Fecal | Mic | 480 | 63 | 13.12 | 3 | Aimen et al., 2022 |
| KPK | Goat & Sheep | Fecal | Mic | 315 | 71 | 22.53 | 3 | Ruhoollah et al., 2021 |
| Punjab | Goat & Sheep | Worm | Mic | 200 | 105 | 52.2 | 3 | Bibi et al., 2017 |
| KPK | Sheep | Fecal | Floa, sed & MM | 300 | 120 | 40 | 4 | Jamil et al., 2016 |
| Punjab | Goat & Sheep | Fecal | Mic & EPG | 646 | 178 | 27.55 | 5 | Qasim et al., 2016 |
| KPK | Goats | Fecal | Mic | 150 | 22 | 14.66 | 4 | Nabi et al., 2014 |
| Punjab | Goat & Sheep | Fecal | Floa & Sed | 1000 | 133 | 13.3 | 4 | Raza et al., 2014 |
| Punjab | Goat | Fecal | Floa & Sed | 100 | 20 | 20 | 3 | Ayaz et al., 2013 |
| Punjab | Goat & Sheep | Fecal | Floa, Sed & MM | 480 | 137 | 28.54 | 4 | Khalid et al., 2013 |
| Balochistan | Sheep | Fecal | McMaster | 1200 | 125 | 10.42 | 2 | Razzaq et al., 2013 |
| KPK | Sheep | Fecal | Mic & Floa | 356 | 190 | 53.37 | 3 | Ullah et al., 2013 |
| Punjab | Sheep | Fecal | Mic, Floa & Sed | 523 | 34 | 6.5 | 4 | Lashari & Tasawar, 2011 |
| Sindh | Goat | Fecal | Mic | 1065 | 156 | 14.65 | 3 | Akhter et al., 2011 |
| Punjab | Sheep | Fecal | MM | 333 | 259 | 77.7 | 3 | Tasawar et al., 2010 |
| Punjab | Goat & Sheep | Worm | K/Iden | 4740 | 1604 | 33.83 | 1 | Raza et al., 2009 |
| Punjab | Goat & Sheep | Fecal | Mic, Floa & Sed | 400 | 225 | 56.25 | 1 | Gadahi et al., 2009 |
| Punjab | Goat | Fecal | Mic, Floa & MM | 300 | 84 | 28 | 2 | Ijaz et al., 2008 |
| Punjab | Sheep | Worm | Mic & K/Iden | 960 | 591 | 61.5 | 3 | Lateef et al., 2005 |
| Punjab | Sheep | Fecal | Mic | 10000 | 5477 | 54.77 | 2 | Jabeen et al., 2000 |
| Islamabad | Sheep | Fecal | Floa & MM | 62 | 54 | 87 | 0 | Sajid et al., 2000 |
Prevalence of Haemonchus contortus in small ruminants concerning various risk factors in Malakand division_
| Risk Factors | Variables | Total samples | Total positive cases | Total prevalence (%) | Goats Positive (%) | Sheep Positive (%) | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | Male | 368 | 85 | 23.1 | 22.62 | 23.50 | 0.2292ns |
| Female | 510 | 136 | 26.7 | 25.22 | 27.86 | ||
| Age | <1 years | 235 | 66 | 28.1 | 29.25 | 27.13 | 0.0391* |
| 1-5 years | 325 | 66 | 20.3 | 17.36 | 22.65 | ||
| >5 years | 318 | 89 | 28 | 27.03 | 28.82 | ||
| Area | Swat | 164 | 43 | 26.2 | 23.19 | 28.42 | 0.9815ns |
| Shangla | 135 | 33 | 24.4 | 23.61 | 25.40 | ||
| Dir (L) | 156 | 41 | 26.3 | 25.00 | 27.50 | ||
| Dir (U) | 130 | 30 | 23.1 | 23.21 | 22.97 | ||
| Malakand | 160 | 42 | 26.2 | 25.76 | 26.60 | ||
| Buner | 133 | 32 | 24.1 | 23.73 | 24.32 | ||
| Grazing system | Grazing | 465 | 126 | 27.1 | 26.19 | 27.84 | 0.1629ns |
| Stall-fed | 413 | 95 | 23 | 21.81 | 24.00 | ||
| Health condition | Healthy | 435 | 86 | 19.8 | 18.78 | 20.59 | 0.0003* |
| Moderate | 338 | 97 | 28.7 | 26.97 | 30.11 | ||
| Poor | 105 | 38 | 36.2 | 36.73 | 35.71 | ||
| Drinking water source | Open | 285 | 81 | 24.4 | 28.46 | 28.39 | 0.1729ns |
| Bore | 187 | 40 | 21.4 | 20.45 | 22.22 | ||
| Stream | 211 | 58 | 27.5 | 25.56 | 28.93 | ||
| Tap water | 195 | 42 | 21.5 | 20.00 | 22.86 | ||
| Season | Autumn | 205 | 48 | 23.4 | 21.98 | 24.56 | 0.5016ns |
| Winter | 190 | 42 | 22.1 | 20.51 | 23.21 | ||
| Spring | 223 | 59 | 26.5 | 25.23 | 27.59 | ||
| Summer | 260 | 72 | 27.7 | 27.05 | 28.26 | ||
| Treatment | Treated | 290 | 50 | 17.2 | 16.55 | 17.88 | 0.0004* |
| Untreated | 588 | 171 | 29.1 | 28.19 | 29.79 |
Morphometric characteristics of H_ contortus egg sizes (in μm)_
| Shape | Statistical index | Length | Width |
| μm | μm | ||
| Oval | Average | 80.98 | 45.05 |
| Maximum | 99 | 61 | |
| Minimum | 63 | 36 | |
| Standard error | 1.6016 | 1.43 | |
| Standard deviation | 9.4749 | 8.49 | |
| Sample variance | 89.7754 | 72.14 | |
| N | 35 | 35 |