Fig. 1.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 3.

Seropositivity by indirect IgG-ELISA according to location of lesions_
| Location of lesions | Number of patients (%) | Anti-Cysticercus IgG-ELISA positivity | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WCA | CFA | SA | ESA | MBA | ||
| Left parietal lobe | 14 (53.84) | 4 (28.57) | 5 (35.71) | 7 (50.0) | 5 (35.74) | 3 (21.42) |
| Right parietal lobe | 2 (7.69) | 0 | 0 | 1 (50.0) | 1 (50.0) | 0 |
| Left frontal lobe | 4 (15.38) | 1 (25.0) | 1 (25.0) | 0 | 1 (25.0) | 0 |
| Right frontal lobe | 3 (11.53) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 (33.0) |
| Occipital lobe | 1 (3.84) | 0 | 0 | 1 (100.0) | 0 | 0 |
| Temporal lobe | 1 (3.84) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Basal ganglia | 1 (3.84) | 0 | 0 | 1 (100.0) | 1 (100.0) | 0 |
| Total | 26 (100.0) | 5 (19.23) | 6 (23.07) | 10 (38.41) | 8 (30.76) | 4 (15.38) |
Seropositivity by indirect IgG-ELISA and EITB assay against the antigens under study_
| Scenario | Number of patients showing seropositive results in ELISA and(or) EITB | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WCA | CFA | SA | ESA | MBA | |
| Presence of both Anti-Cysticercus antibody in IgG-ELISA and Immunodominant band in EITB | 2 | 3 | 7 | 6 | 4 |
| Presence of Anti-Cysticercus antibody in IgG-ELISA, but absence of Immunodominant band in EITB | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 0 |
| Absence of Anti-Cysticercus antibody in IgG-ELISA, but presence of Immunodominant band in EITB | 8 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
Age and gender distribution of epileptic patients_
| Age (years) | Male (%) | Female (%) | Total (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| < 15 | 3 (11.53) | 1 (3.84) | 4 (15.38) |
| 15–29 | 8 (30.76) | 3 (11.53) | 11 (42.30) |
| 30–44 | 7 (26.92) | 3 (11.53) | 10 (38.46) |
| ≥45 | 1 (3.84) | 0 (0) | 1 (3.84) |
| Total | 19 (73.07) | 7 (26.93) | 26 (100.0) |
Seropositivity result by indirect IgG-ELISA according to type of antigens and CT/MRI lesions*_
| Type of lesion | Number of Patients (%) | Number of patients seropositive against the antigens | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WCA (%) | CFA (%) | SA (%) | ESA (%) | MBA (%) | ||
| Granular nodular | 4 (15.38) | 0 | 0 | 1 (25.0) | 0 | 0 |
| Calcified granular | 13 (50.0) | 2 (15.38) | 3 (23.07) | 6 (46.15) | 5 (38.46) | 1 (7.69) |
| Ring enhancing | 6 (23.07) | 3 (50.0) | 2 (33.33) | 3 (50.0) | 3 (50.0) | 2 (33.33) |
| Calcified spots | 3 (11.53) | 0 | 1 (33.33) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 26 (100.0) | 5 (19.23) | 6 (23.07) | 10 (38.46) | 8 (30.76) | 4 (15.38) |
Seropositivity by indirect IgG-ELISA according to number of lesions_
| Number of lesions | Number of patients | Anti-cysticercus IgG ELISA positivity | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WCA | CFA | SA | ESA | MBA | ||
| Single lesion | 19 (73.07) | 3 (15.78) | 2 (10.52) | 8 (42.14) | 4 (21.05) | 3 (15.78) |
| Multiple lesions | 7 (26.93) | 2 (28.57) | 4 (57.14) | 2 (28.57) | 4 (57.14) | 1 (14.28) |
| Total | 26 (100.0) | 5 (19.23) | 6 (23.07) | 10 (38.41) | 8 (30.76) | 4 (15.38) |