Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Binary logistic regression analysis for factors potentially associated with Paramphistomum infection in ruminants of district Narowal, Punjab Pakistan_
| Variables | Categories | Paramphistomum | Test (p-value) | OR (95% CI) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yes | No | ||||
| Age | Adult | 190 | 117 | 33.027 (0.000)* | 0.002 (0.000 – 0.018) |
| Young | 26 | 51 | – | – | |
| Sex | Male | 126 | 129 | 53.253 (0.000)* | 8.968 (4.975 – 16.165) |
| Female | 90 | 39 | – | – | |
| Species | Cattle | 76 | 34 | 29.590 (0.000)* | 10.997 (4.636 – 26.090) |
| Goat | 53 | 68 | 28.446 (0.000)* | 328.390 (39.053 – 2761.354) | |
| Sheep | 22 | 31 | 0.049 (0.825) | 1.089 (0.513 – 2.310) | |
| Buffalo | 65 | 35 | – | – | |
Analysis of Means ± SEM of different histological features of rumens amongst different groups of large and small ruminants of Narowal district, Punjab, Pakistan_
| Parameters (μm) | Normal | Group A | Group B | Group C |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Large Ruminants | ||||
| Epithelium Thickness | 46.96±2.05a | 35.49±1.93b | 31.12±1.82b | 31.07±1.68b |
| Ruminal Papilla Length | 645.34±10.27a | 562.98±17.57 b | 448.42±6.48c | 424.42±15.12c |
| Ruminal Papilla Width | 310.63±25.47a | 290.80±27.88 a | 284.52±4.15 a | 209.55±6.31b |
| Tela Submucosa | 213.39±8.61a | 194.69±6.64ab | 198.08±10.28ab | 192.01±5.54ab |
| Muscularis Externae | 714.83±31.76a | 697.85±34.71b | 533.91±16.12c | 525.35±12.82c |
| Small Ruminants | ||||
| Epithelium Thickness | 41.65±3.24 a | 38.2±0.76 a | 29.76±4.76 b | 30.78±0.97 b |
| Ruminal Papilla Length | 712.87±9.27 a | 680.37±12.72 a | 503.46±15.7 b | 418.30±17.36 c |
| Ruminal Papilla Width | 205.32±7.5 a | 187.97±7.5 a | 198.31±4.2 a | 190.47±10.3 a |
| Tela Submucosa | 177.45±8.3 a | 175.37±9.1 a | 168.59±6.3 a | 170.67±10.2 a |
| Muscularis Externae | 503.46±23.29 a | 498.71±15.78 a | 415.60±12.08 b | 405.36 ±16.32 b |