Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The effect of soil type and ecosystems on the soil nematode and microbial communities Cover

The effect of soil type and ecosystems on the soil nematode and microbial communities

Open Access
|May 2020

Figures & Tables

Table 1

Soil type, location, ecosystem type, and vegetation characteristics of the study plots.

Soil typeLocation/characteristicsEcosystemVegetation
Hanušovce nad Topľou Altitude 258 – 308 m a.s.l., slope 3 – 7°Forest 49°00.339′N, 21°31.248′ECarpinus betulus (90 %), Pinus sylvestris (5 %), sporadically Prunus avium, Fagus sylvatica, and Betula pendula. Understory vegetation dominated by grasses Carex pilosa, Festuca drymeja, and Poa memoralis and
Soil with strong mottling of the soil profile due to redox processesherbs Dentaria bulbifera and Fragaria vesca
Stagnosolcaused by stagnating surface water, The topsoil can also be completely bleached (albic horizon). A common name in many national classification systems for most Stagnosols isMeadow 49°00.658′N, 21°30.058′ECarex sp., Lolium perenne, Fragaria vesca, Trifolium pratense, Plantago sp. Leucanthemum sp.
pseudogley.Agricultural field 49°00.727′N, 21°30.344′EZea mays monoculture
Tŕnie Altitude 550 – 554 m a.s.l., slope 3 – 7°Forest 48°36.712′N, 19°01.462′ECarpinus betulus (75 %), Quercus robur (10 %), Tilia cordata (10 %), and sporadically Prunus avium Understory herbaceous vegetation dominated by Viola reichenbachiana, Geranium robertianum,
Soil with a beginning of soil formation. The horizon differentiation is weak. ThisAsarum europaeum, Luzula sylvatica, Galium odoratum, and Hedera helix.
Cambisolis evident from weak, mostly brownish discolouration and/or structure formation in the soil profile. Cambisols areMeadow 48°36.683′N, 19°01.494′ETrifolium pratense, Agrimonia eupatoria, and grasses such as Carex sp., Poa sp., Dactylis glomerata, Trifolium pratense, Rumex acetosa
developed in medium and fine-textured materials derived from
a wide range of rocks, mostly in alluvial, colluvial and aeolian deposits.Agricultural field N 48°36.660′N, E 19°01.503′EZea mays monoculture
Močenok Altitude 135 – 180 m a.s.l.,Forest 48°12.960′N,Fraxinus excelsior (80 %), Quercus petraea (20 %), and sporadically Robinia pseudoacacia.
slope 0 – 3° Black-colored soil containing a high percentage of humus (4 % to 16 %)17°57.854′EUnderstory vegetation dominated by grasses Poa nemoralis, Brachypodium sylvaticum, Melica uniflora, and Dactylis polygama
Chernozemand high percentages of phosphoric cids, phosphorus, and ammonia. Chernozem is very fertile and can produce high agricultural yields with its high moisture storage capacity. Chernozems are also a reference soil group of the World referenceMeadow 49°00.339′N, 21°30.344′ECarex sp., Phleum pratense, Arrhenatherum elatius, Trifolium pratense, Vicia sp., Rumex acetosa, Achillea millefolium
base for soil resourcesAgricultural field 49°00.339′N, 21°30.344′EZea mays monoculture
Fig. 1

RDA triplots of the relationships of abundance of nematode functional guilds, microbial parameters, and soil properties in the forest (A), agricultural field (B), and meadow (C) ecosystems and the Stagnosol (SS), Cambisol (CC), and Chernozem (CM) soil types.

Table 2

Effects of ecosystem type (E), type of soil (S), sampling date (D), and their interactions on basic soil physical and chemical characteristics.

EcosystemSoilDateE × SE × DS × DEcosystemSoilDateE × S × D
FPFPFPFPFPFPMeadowAgricultural fieldForestStagnosolCambisolChernozemMayJulySeptFP
pH/H2O28.91< 0.01598.43< 0.012.95ns80.12<0.012.63<0.052.05ns5.88±0.785.79±0.755.54±1.084.82±0.615.71±0.416.68±0.325.68±0.885.71±0.875.81 ±0.921.08ns
SM60.14< 0.010.99ns131.43< 0.012.72< 0.055.39< 0.0133.88ns26.33±7.2822.14±5.1430.78±8.6426.15±8.9626.93±8.8526.15±5.7526.68±8.0420.52±5.4732.10±5.32.53<0.05
N156.52< 0.01122.56< 0.010.15ns11.22< 0.010.29ns2.60ns0.377±0.100.205±0.070.395±0.130.244±0.060.300±0.090.434±0.150.326±0.120.321±0.120.331±0.161.36ns
C275.46< 0.01140.58< 0.010.08ns6.33< 0.010.41ns1.89ns3.588±1.051.955±0.854.395±1.282.429±0.843.127±1.3214.382±1.483.298±1.383.271±1.403.369±1.641.87ns
S32.62< 0.0151.84< 0.012.11ns10.39< 0.014.79< 0.013.75ns0.071±0.020.048±0.010.070±0.020.049±0.020.060±0.010.082±0.020.067±0.030.060±0.180.063±0.022.71<0.01
C/N171.64< 0.017.51< 0.011.81ns49.09< 0.011.86ns1.21ns9.49±0.549.35±0.9811.28±1.069.86±1.7010.08±1.2110.18±0.569.95±1.3210.04±1.2410.14±1.161.80ns

[i] E: meadow, agriculture and forest; S: Stagnosol, Cambisol and Chernozem; D: May, July, and September

pH/H2O, acidity; SM, soil moisture content N, total nitrogen content C, organic carbon content S, total sulphur content; C/N, carbon to nitrogen ratio. The means ±SEs of nematode abundance for the three ecosystems, soil types, and sampling dates are shown.

Table 3

Effects of ecosystem type (E), type of soil (S), sampling date (D), and their interactions on nematode abundance, functional guilds and microbial communities.

EcosystemSoilDateE × SE x DS :D xEcosystemSoilDateE × S × D
FPFPFPFPFPFPMeadowAgricultural fieldForestStagnosolCambisolChernozemMayJulySeptFP
Nabund2.36ns92.49< 0.0115.04< 0.0137.97< 0.015.57< 0.011.63ns479.8±119.8540.1±322.5451.8±169.5351.6±150.1435.8±104.9671.3±260.3549.2±276.3418.1±165.9504.1±201.81.59ns
Nspec5.69< 0.014.87<0.010.88ns12.45< 0.011.98ns2.98ns33.2±5.725.2±6.237.1±4.124.1±5.832.5±6.338.5±7.533.0±7.729.0±1131.7±8.41.12ns
Ba16.19< 0.0185.42<0.011.24ns21.63< 0.011.78ns1.76ns10.9±11.138.6±43.922.18±21.84.2±5.841.9±41.625.6±20.722.6±30.421.1±25.628.1±36.30.97ns
Ba25.49< 0.0112.36<0.0111.48< 0.0135.72< 0.016.11< 0.012.44ns159.4±80.3181.8±118.6190.8±84.5145.8±87.3150.3±52.0214.6±122.0207.8±117.8147.2±75.4165.8±81.21.70ns
Ba339.96< 0.01117.06<0.012.9ns29.93< 0.011.24ns3.98ns2.3±5.00.0±0.03.1±5.50.0±0.00.2±0.75.11±6.51.0±2.62.9±6.41.4±3.32.12ns
Ba45.82< 0.0128.8<0.010.07ns1.9ns0.69ns0.77ns3.7±7.21.5±3.62.9±4.00.9±1.60.6±1.36.6±7.52.9±6.32.5±4.82.7±4.70.83ns
Ca315.89< 0.0124.98<0.010.67ns7.47< 0.010.47ns0.27ns1.0±1.70.0±0.00.6±1.20.0 ±0.00.3±0.91.3±1.80.4±1.20.6±1.40.5±1.30.22ns
Ca445.67< 0.0163.63<0.010.08ns31.3< 0.010.23ns0.14ns3.9±3.91.8±3.510.4±9.71.0±2.27.0±7.68.1±8.45.1±6.85.8±8.35.2±6.90.80ns
Ca511.63< 0.0111.63<0.011.22ns11.63< 0.011.22ns1.22ns0.0±0.00.6±1.60.0±0.00.6±1.60.0±0.00.0±0.00.2±0.90.3±1.30.1 ±0.41.22ns
Fu27.03< 0.0150.64<0.013.42< 0.0530.43< 0.016.69< 0.011.42ns97.8±34.7155.6±156.787.5±52.668.1±38.590.1±40.4182.7±143.5122.4±127.592.2±126.2126.2±104.51.42ns
Fu34.06< 0.054.06<0.050.79ns7.88< 0.010.57ns0.57ns1.4±4.50.0±0.00.3±1.20.3±1.20.0±0.01.4±4.50.5±0.30.5±1.20.8±2.70.68ns
Fu429.26< 0.0118.65< 0.010.18ns14.74< 0.011.20ns0.90ns3.7±4.90.0±0.05.3±9.31.9±4.40.9±2.26.2±9.23.6±8.32.8±5.42.5±5.30.89ns
Om44.24< 0.0543.16< 0.012.41ns10.80< 0.010.62ns1.13ns31.2±29.821.7±19.041.0±37.016.0±16.835.8±22.252.1 ±35.141.5±37.233.2±25.229.3±24.00.55ns
Om55.32< 0.0522.74< 0.010.94ns4.84< 0.010.65ns2.36ns19.8±7.48.7±12.115.4±13.28.2±9.18.6±5.320.1±13.712.8±10.312.5±14.211.7±9.11.87ns
Pp219.66< 0.011.02ns6.47< 0.019.28< 0.011.03ns2.55ns62.4±42.954.8±47.025.3±20.146.7±46.943.3±29.152.4±46.349.4±33.933.0±27.559.9±54.42.55ns
Pp327.71< 0.0124.21< 0.010.11ns14.19< 0.010.75ns5.04< 0.0174.9±43.357.8±39.228.1±24.536.6±36.249.2±30.574.7±46.358.4±46.849.1±34.652.9±41.52.38ns
Pp53.46< 0.053.78<0.050.59ns7.78< 0.010.37ns0.37ns0.27±0.950.0±0.00.5±1.30.3±0.90.0±0.00.5±1.30.4±1.20.2±0.80.2±0.80.48ns
Cmic175.55< 0.01295.91<0.012.84ns5.02< 0.010.69ns2.64<0.05335.2±118.3207.9±91.5400.1±145.5183.0±65.9325.9±119.4434.4±109.2316.0±129.1300.4±143.4326.8±157.819.0ns
Richn3.60< 0.0550.90<0.0111.28< 0.011.88ns0.68ns14.01< 0.0126.2±2.3925.5±1.8626.5±2.9324.2±2.326.8±1.9627.2±1.925.8±1.826.9±1.925.5±3.23.19< 0.01
Diver3.15<0.0553.52<0.010.69ns1.96ns2.24ns4.69< 0.0114.51±2.613.85±2.414.9±3.012.1 ±2.915.6±2.315.6±2.414.2±2.114.7±2.714.5±3.234.2< 0.01
E: meadow, agriculture and forest; S: Stagnosol, Cambisol and Chernozem; D: May, July, and September

[i] Ba1,2,3,4, bacterivores; Fu2,3,4, fungivores; Ca3,4,5, carnivores; Om4,5, omnivores; Pp2,3,5, plant parasites; Nabund, meannematode abundance/100 g dry soil, Nspec, mean nematode species number/100 g dry soil; Cmic, microbial biomass carbon content; Richn, richness of microbial functional groups; Diver, diversity of microbial functional groups. The means ±SEs of nematode abundance for the three ecosystems, soil types, and sampling dates are shown.

Table 4

Effects of ecosystem type (E), type of soil (S), sampling date (D), and their interactions on nematode trophic-web descriptors.

EcosystemSoilDateE × SE × DS × DEcosystemSoilDateE × S × D
FPFPFPFPFPFPMeadowAgricultural fieldForestStagnosolCambisolChernozemMayJulySeptFP
MI18.86< 0.0121.28<0.015.56< 0.0144.11< 0.014.22< 0.012.04<0.052.32±0.192.21±0.232.37±0.232.25±0.202.24±0.232.41±0.232.33±0.252.32±0.242.24±0.191.83<0.05
ΣMI11.34< 0.0125.74< 0.013.89< 0.0528.66< 0.012.27ns0.95ns2.38±0.172.28±0.162.39±0.212.28±0.152.30±0.152.45±0.202.35±0.222.38±0.182.31 ±0.161.46ns
PPI0.70ns16.05< 0.017.03< 0.018.30< 0.012.24ns6.25< 0.012.5±0.202.53±0.222.51±0.262.43±0.242.53±0.202.62±0.202.59±0.232.60±0.212.38±0.226.41< 0.01
H'125.08< 0.0187.76< 0.010.73ns22.99< 0.010.99ns2.50<0.052.91 ±0.222.60±0.153.02±0.292.64±0.182.88±0.253.01±0.302.82±0.262.85±0.282.86±0.332.67<0.05
EI4.52< 0.059.05< 0.011.46ns14.80< 0.010.76ns2.32ns41.3±9.946.7±12.446.2±11.338.9±5.647.8±14.847.1±10.542.3±9.446.3±13.245.3±11.84.70< 0.01
SI4.53< 0.0561.88< 0.011.78ns25.55< 0.016.20< 0.013.60<0.0144.3±18.441.0±13.349.2±18.430.7±12.150.5±10.853.2±18.244.5±19.447.1±16.542.9±15.72.06<0.05
CI53.82< 0.0161.48< 0.010.11ns182.05< 0.0113.74<0.013.14<0.0568.5±16.857.9±30.152.7±16.364.4±18.952.7±28.861.9±18.460.1±23.861.6±24.957.5±20.315.57<0.01
NCR7.77< 0.0134.25< 0.015.17< 0.0142.19<0.016.01<0.011.88ns0.65±0.120.63±0.160.69±0.130.69±0.140.70±0.120.57±0.120.69±0.120.65±0.130.64±0.164.02< 0.01
TD19.17< 0.0115.09< 0.010.009ns16.81<0.011.75ns1.15ns12.2±2.410.5±4.214.7±2.110.5±3.213.2±1.913.7±2.412.3±0.812.5±0.712.9±0.71.34ns

[i] E: meadow, agriculture and forest; S: Stagnosol, Cambisol and Chernozem; D: May, July, and September

MI, maturity index; ΣMI, sigma maturity index; PPI, plant parasitic index; H´, Shannon diversity index; EI, enrichment index; SI, structure index; CI, channel index; NCR, nematode channel ratio; TD, trophic diversity. The means ±SEs of the nematode-community descriptors for the three ecosystems, soil types, and sampling dates are shown

Table 5

Spearman´s rank correlation coefficients between nematode abundance, species number, functional guild, microbial parameters and soil properties.

pH/H2OSMNCSC/N
Nabund0.35**0.68***0.42***0.29**nsns
Nspec0.22*ns0.31*0.37***nsns
Ba10.44**ns0.25***0.22*0.31***ns
Ba2ns-0.23***nsnsnsns
Ba30.54***0.26*0.44***0.41***0.42***0.21*
Ba40.43***ns0.30***0.29***0.30***ns
Ca30.44***0.46***0.39***0.40***0.39***0.33***
Ca40.41***ns0.21*0.22*0.22**0.21**
Ca5ns0.41***0.35*ns0.36*0.26*
Fu20.55***ns0.35***0.29**0.37***ns
Fu3nsnsnsnsnsns
Fu40.39***0.37***0.29***0.26**0.27**ns
Om40.42***nsnsns0.33**ns
Om50.38***ns0.21*ns0.23**ns
Pp2nsnsnsnsns-0.27***
Pp30.47***0.24***nsnsnsns
Pp50.39***0.37***0.28***0.28***0.29**0.38***
Cmic0.70***0.39***0.90***0.91***0.83***0.51***
Richn0.46***ns0.47***0.45***0.53***ns
Diver0.47***ns0.40***0.38***0.50***ns

Ba1,2,3,4, bacteriovores; Fu2,3,4, fungivores; Ca3,4,5, carnivores; Om4,5, omnivores; Pp2,3,5, plant parasites; Cmic, microbial biomass carbon content; Richn, richness of microbial functional groups; Diver, diversity of microbial functional groups; pH/H2O, acidity; SM, soil moisture content; N, total nitrogen content; C, organic carbon content; S, total sulphur content; C/N, carbon to nitrogen ratio

** P<0.01;

*** P<0.001; ns, not significant

*** P<0.001; ns, not significant

** P<0.01;

* P<0.05;

* P<0.05;

*** P<0.001; ns, not significant

** P<0.01;

*** P<0.001; ns, not significant

* P<0.05;

*** P<0.001; ns, not significant

*** P<0.001; ns, not significant

*** P<0.001; ns, not significant

* P<0.05;

*** P<0.001; ns, not significant

*** P<0.001; ns, not significant

*** P<0.001; ns, not significant

* P<0.05;

*** P<0.001; ns, not significant

*** P<0.001; ns, not significant

*** P<0.001; ns, not significant

*** P<0.001; ns, not significant

*** P<0.001; ns, not significant

*** P<0.001; ns, not significant

*** P<0.001; ns, not significant

*** P<0.001; ns, not significant

*** P<0.001; ns, not significant

*** P<0.001; ns, not significant

*** P<0.001; ns, not significant

* P<0.05;

* P<0.05;

** P<0.01;

** P<0.01;

*** P<0.001; ns, not significant

* P<0.05;

* P<0.05;

* P<0.05;

*** P<0.001; ns, not significant

*** P<0.001; ns, not significant

** P<0.01;

*** P<0.001; ns, not significant

*** P<0.001; ns, not significant

*** P<0.001; ns, not significant

*** P<0.001; ns, not significant

** P<0.01;

** P<0.01;

*** P<0.001; ns, not significant

** P<0.01;

*** P<0.001; ns, not significant

* P<0.05;

** P<0.01;

*** P<0.001; ns, not significant

*** P<0.001; ns, not significant

*** P<0.001; ns, not significant

*** P<0.001; ns, not significant

*** P<0.001; ns, not significant

*** P<0.001; ns, not significant

*** P<0.001; ns, not significant

** P<0.01;

*** P<0.001; ns, not significant

*** P<0.001; ns, not significant

*** P<0.001; ns, not significant

*** P<0.001; ns, not significant

*** P<0.001; ns, not significant

*** P<0.001; ns, not significant

*** P<0.001; ns, not significant

*** P<0.001; ns, not significant

*** P<0.001; ns, not significant

*** P<0.001; ns, not significant

*** P<0.001; ns, not significant

*** P<0.001; ns, not significant

*** P<0.001; ns, not significant

*** P<0.001; ns, not significant

*** P<0.001; ns, not significant

Table S1

Mean abundance of nematode species (100 g of dry soil) in the three ecosystems (forest (FOR), meadow (MEA), and agricultural field (AGR)) and types of soil (Stagnosol (SS), Cambisol (CS), and Chernozem (CM)) (n=45). Bold figures indicate dominance >2 but <5%, and bold and underlined figures indicate dominance >5%.

EcosystemSoil
TaxonTG/FGFORMEAAGRSSCSCM
Mesorhabditis spp. juvsBa113.50.613.417.410.1
Panagrolaimus rigidusBa12.06.17.21.35.88.2
Rhabditis spp. juvsBa16.74.318.12.918.77.4
Acrobeles ciliatusBa220.32.80.423.4
Acrobeloides buetschliiBa20.40.4
Acrobeloides nanusBa243.040.930.130.245.138.2
Acrobelophis minimusBa20.60.6
Acrolobus emarginatusBa20.10.1
Anaplectus granulosusBa22.55.12.72.41.97.2
Cervidellus cervusBa20.10.1
Cervidellus vexiligerBa25.82.70.68.4
Cephalobus persegnisBa217.714.322.724.427.611.5
Ereptonema arcticumBa21.91.9
Eucephalobus mucronatusBa22.91.31.6
Eucephalobus oxyuroidesBa212.613.517.522.17.713.9
Eucephalobus striatusBa27.23.344.813.55.139.4
Eumonhystera disparBa21.01.0
Eumonystera filiformisBa21.72.4
Geomonhystera villosaBa21.01.0
Heterocephalobus elongatusBa28.64.09.710.29.92.2
Heterocephalobus eurystoma (N)Ba20.70.7
Chiloplacus demaniBa27.45.81.6
Chiloplacus propinquusBa218.222.623.821.612.230.8
Chiloplacus symmetricusBa21.01.0
Plectus acuminatusBa21.18.10.95.62.6
Plectus cirratusBa27.33.13.94.32.1
Plectus communisBa23.13.1
Plectus longicaudatusBa23.82.01.8
Plectus parietinusBa26.39.97.67.04.412.4
Plectus parvusBa210.915.015.54.65.8
Plectus rhizophilusBa20.90.9
Plectus silvaticusBa21.31.3
Seleborca complexaBa20.70.7
Stegelletina leopolitensis (N)Ba20.13.20.92.4
Wilsonema schuurmansstekhoveniBa26.51.71.83.62.9
Aulolaimus oxycephalusBa31.11.1
Bastiania gracilisBa30.2
Prismatolaimus intermediusBa32.31.23.5
Teratocephalus lirellusBa30.10.1
Teratocephalus terrestrisBa30.70.20.5
Alaimus parvusBa40.60.6
Alaimus primitivusBa42.23.71.30.40.56.3
Amphidelus coronatusBa40.20.2
Amphidelus elegansBa40.20.10.20.1
Tripyla affinisCa30.60.81.4
Trischistoma monohysteraCa30.30.3
Clarkus papillatusCa42.61.80.82.33.0
Coomansus parvusCa41.30.11.30.1
Coomanus zschokkeiCa40.70.7
Ironus macramphisCa40.40.4
Mylonchulus brachyurisCa43.21.70.91.02.42.5
Prionchulus muscorumCa42.52.5
Paravulus hartingiiCa50.60.6
Aphelenchoides bicaudatusFu20.30.10.10.3
Aphelenchoides composticolaFu29.711.00.97.45.38.9
Aphelenchoides limberiFu21.40.21.2
Aphelenchoides parietinusFu25.57.414.83.23.021.6
Aphelenchoides saprophilusFu21.11.31.00.11.3
Aphelenchus avenaeFu222.839.582.421.235.688.0
Ditylenchus dipsaciFu20.60.51.1
Ditylenchus intermediusFu23.615.7*8.34.76.3
Ditylenchus longicaudaFu21.10.70.4
Ditylenchus longimetricalisFu22.71.01.7
Ditylenchus myceliophagusFu21.70.70.61.7
Ditylenchus parvus (N)Fu21.21.2
Ditylenchus tenuidens (N)Fu20.80.8
Ditylenchus sp.Fu21.71.7
Filenchus discrepansFu22.62.6
Filenchus misellusFu21.01.0
Filenchus polyhypnusFu27.27.2
Filenchus thorneiFu23.32.12.13.3
Filenchus vulgarisFu28.119.132.217.613.735.2
Hexatylus viviparusFu20.50.5
Nothotylenchus acrisFu20.70.7
Paraphelenchus obscurus (N)Fu24.64.6
Paraphelenchus pseudoparietinusFu21.51.80.82.12.1
Diphtherophora communisFu30.31.40.31.4
Tylencholaimus mirablisFu40.70.91.6
Tylencholaimus steckiFu44.32.81.90.9
Tylencholaimus teresFu40.30.3
Aporcelaimus superbusOm40.40.4
Campydora demonstransOm40.20.2
Crassolabium ettersbergenseOm42.41.01.42.0
Dorydorella bryophilaOm43.76.710.4
Dorylaimoides micoletzkyiOm41.42.41.71.30.8
Ecumenicus monohysteraOm40.20.42.40.22.8
Eudorylaimus carteriOm43.919.59.210.810.511.3
Eudorylaimus leuckartiOm49.92.32.51.52.710.5
Eudorylaimus inersOm43.43.4
Eudorylaimus opistohysteraOm42.92.11.42.34.1
Eudorylaimus spp. juvsOm47.53.13.32.16.55.3
Mesodorylaimus meyliOm42.02.0
Microdorylaimus parvusOm42.80.22.45.60.2
Pungentus silvestrisOm40.73.54.2
Aporcelaimellus obtusicaudatusOm57.82.26.82.34.711.6
Axonchium propinquumOm50.10.1
Discolaimus majorOm50.90.9
Discolaimus texanusOm50.50.5
Epidorylaimus agilisOm50.40.4
Mesodorylaimus bastianiOm52.62.92.14.80.62.1
Metaxonchium coronatumOm50.60.6
Nygolaimus brachyurisOm51.10.30.8
Oxydirus oxycephalusOm52.52.11.70.62.02.6
Paraxonchium laetificansOm50.60.10.51.2
Prodorylaimus acrisOm50.60.40.40.6
Aglenchus agricolaPp21.96.432.910.34.828.7
Basiria gracilisPp20.70.7
Basiria similisPp20.60.30.3
Basiria tumidaPp22.01.80.2
Boleodorus thylactusPp20.524.86.821.36.64.0
Boleodorus volutus (N)Pp20.40.40.8
Cephalenchus intermedius (N)Pp20.20.2
Coslenchus andrássyi (N)Pp20.70.7
Coslenchus costatusPp21.81.93.7
Ecphyadophora tenuissima (N)Pp20.40.4
Malenchus acarayensisPp29.17.64.4
Malenchus bryophilusPp212.42.214.6
Malenchus exiguusPp22.610.12.71.06.8
Malenchus gratiosusPp20.90.9
Neopsilenchus magnidensPp20.50.5
Tylenchus davaineiPp24.65.41.62.72.95.9
Paratylenchus bukowinensisPp215.811.54.3
Paratylenchus microdorusPp210.93.56.41.0
Paratylenchus projectusPp23.43.4
Psilenchus hilarulusPp22.00.92.60.2
Amplimerlinius macrurusPp30.714.814.30.7
Bitylenchus dubiusPp310.812.84.119.5
Bitylenchus maximusPp32.21.70.5
Geocenamus brevidensPp37.15.26.51.7
Geocenamus microdorusPp321.021.0
Geocenamus nanusPo38.88.85.0
Helicotylenchus canadensisPp33.81.35.1
Helicotylenhus digonicusPp311.00.63.38.4
Helicotylencus dihysteraPp310.210.2
Heterodera mani juvsPp31.21.2
Heterodera avenae juvsPp30.30.60.9
Meloidogyne haplaPp31.11.1
Nagelus obscurusPp31.11.1
Pratylenchoides crenicaudaPp30.80.51.3
Pratylenchus crenatusPp31.30.70.6
Pratylenchus penetransPp34.69.77.59.7
Pratylenchus pratensisPp39.17.46.30.66.8
Tylenchorhynchus bicaudatusPp30.10.1
Tylenchorhynchus cylindricusPp32.32.3
Longidorus elongatusPp50.30.3
Longidorus intermediusPp50.50.5
Total number of species9990536081102

[i] juvs, juveniles; (N), species new for Slovak fauna

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/helm-2020-0014 | Journal eISSN: 1336-9083 | Journal ISSN: 0440-6605
Language: English
Page range: 129 - 144
Submitted on: Jul 11, 2019
Accepted on: Feb 21, 2020
Published on: May 23, 2020
Published by: Slovak Academy of Sciences, Institute of Parasitology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: Volume open

© 2020 M. Renčo, E. Gömöryová, A. Čerevková, published by Slovak Academy of Sciences, Institute of Parasitology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.