References
- Abou El-Komboz, L., & Goldbeck, M. (2024). Virtually borderless? Cultural proximity and international collaboration of developers. Economics Letters, 244, Article 111951.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2024.111951
- Aagaard, K., Mongeon, P., Ramos-Vielba, I., & Thomas, D. A. (2021). Getting to the bottom of research funding: Acknowledging the complexity of funding dynamics. PLOS ONE, 16(5), e0251488. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0251488
- Akkerman, S., Admiraal, W., Brekelmans, M., & et al. (2008). Auditing quality of research in social sciences. Quality & Quantity, 42, 257–274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-006-9044-4
- Alsadi, N., & Norhayatizakuan, N. (2021). The impact of risk management practices on the performance of construction projects. Studies of Applied Economics, 39(4). https://doi.org/10.25115/eea.v39i4.4164
- Anglani, F., Pennetta, S., Reaiche, C., & Boyle, S. (2023). Crossing digital frontiers with cultural intelligence - a new paradigm for project managers. International Journal of Project Management, 41(8), 102543.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2023.102543
- Badea, A. R., & Feeney, O. (2025). Genome editing dilemma: Navigating dual-use potential and charting the path forward. Bioethical Inquiry, 22, 101–110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-024-10358-8
- Bartel-Radic, A., & Munch, F. (2023). Cross-cultural boundary spanning activities in a global team: Insights from an ethnographic case study. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management.https://doi.org/10.1177/14705958231185432
- Becker, R. (2017). “The European Approach for Quality Assurance of Joint Programmes” 2017https://ehea.info/media.ehea.info/file/20171109-10Tartu/16/9/PLA_JointProgrammes_Report31102017_849169.pdf
- Bento, S., Pereira, L., Gonçalves, R., Dias, Á., & Costa, R. L. D. (2022). Artificial intelligence in project management: systematic literature review. International Journal of Technology Intelligence and Planning, 13(2), 143-163
- Brits, H., & du Plessis, L. (2007). Application of focus group interviews for quality management: An action research project. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 20(2), 117-126.
- Bruzzone, F., & Nocera, S. (2020). Some considerations on the role of universities and research centers in EU-funded sustainable mobility projects. In O. Gervasi et al. (Eds.), Computational science and its applications–ICCSA 2020. Lecture notes in computer science (Vol. 12250). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58802-1_15
- Cheng, C.-C., Huang, K.-H., & Lin, Y.-K. (2023). Facilitating sustainable development of preschools: A system thinking training project in Taiwan. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 81(5), 598–610.
- Cheng, C., Messerschmidt, L., Bravo, I., & et al. (2024). A general primer for data harmonization. Scientific Data, 11, 152. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-024-02956-3
- Churchill, N. (1988). Quality assurance—An effective project management technique. International Journal of Project Management, 6(4), 241–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/0263-7863(88)90009-9
- Díez, F., Villa, A., López Vélez, A. L., & Iraurgi, I. (2020). Impact of quality management systems in the performance of educational centers: Educational policies and management processes. Heliyon, 6(4), e03824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03824
- Domínguez, E., Pérez, B., Rubio, Á. L., & Zapata, M. A. (2019). A taxonomy for key performance indicators management. Computer Standards & Interfaces, 64, 24-40.
- European University Association (EUA). (2025). Horizon Europe 2028–2034: EUA analysis of the European Commission’s proposal. EUA.
- Fishberg, R. (2022). EU social science collaborations as unequal Europeanisation: An ethnographic study of people and practices in EU-funded research (Doctoral dissertation). Roskilde University.
- Forskning.RUC.https://rucforsk.ruc.dk/ws/portalfiles/portal/89342001/Rachel_Fishberg_PhD_Dissertation_Bortredigeret.pdf
- Famularo, J.(2023). Corporate social responsibility communication in the ICT sector: digital issues, greenwashing, and materiality. Int J Corporate Soc Responsibility 8, 8 https://doi.org/10.1186/s40991-023-00082-8
- Garousi, V., Borg, M., & Oivo, M. (2020). Practical relevance of software engineering research: Synthesizing the community’s voice. Empirical Software Engineering, 25, 1687-1754.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-020-09803-0
- Gigerenzer, G., Allen, C., Gaillard, S., Goldstone, R. L., Haaf, J., Holmes, W. R., Kashima, Y., Motz, B., Musslick, S., & Stefan, A. (2025). Alternative models of funding curiosity-driven research. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 122(5), e2401237121. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2401237121
- Gordieiev, O., Kharchenko, V., Fominykh, N., & Sklyar, V. (2014). Evolution of software quality models in context of the standard ISO 25010. In W. Zamojski, J. Mazurkiewicz, J. Sugier, T. Walkowiak, & J. Kacprzyk (Eds.), Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Dependability and Complex Systems (DepCoS-RELCOMEX 2014). Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing (Vol. 286). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07013-1_21
- Grigore, M. C., & Ionescu, S. (2019). Key Performance Indicators for Project Monitoring and controlling with focus on resource allocation and Quality Assurance - research Study. In International Conference on Management and Industrial Engineering (No. 9, pp. 512-526). Niculescu Publishing House.
- Gronbaek, D. J. V. H. (2003). A European Research Council: An idea whose time has come? Science and Public Policy, 30(6), 391–404. https://doi.org/10.3152/147154303781780263
- Hähnel, M. (2024). Conceptualizing dual use: A multidimensional approach. Research Ethics, 21(2), 205–227. https://doi.org/10.1177/17470161241261466
- Helm, P., de Götzen, A., Cernuzzi, L., Hume, A., Diwakar, S., Ruiz Correa, S., & Gatica-Perez, D. (2023). Diversity and neocolonialism in Big Data research: Avoiding extractivism while struggling with paternalism. Big Data & Society, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517231206802
- Hollmann, S., Regierer, B., Bechis, J., Tobin, L., & D’Elia, D. (2022). Ten simple rules on how to develop a stakeholder engagement plan. PLOS Computational Biology, 18(10), e1010520. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010520
- Høyland, S. A., Hagen, J. M., & Engelbach, W. (2017). Developing and applying a framework for assessing the research quality of qualitative project methods in the EU project SECUR-ED. SAGE Open, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244017710291
- Huang. Y., et al., (2024). ISCom: Interest-Aware Semantic Communication Scheme for Point Cloud Video Streaming on Metaverse XR Devices, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 42 (4) 1003-1021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/JSAC.2023.3345430
- Imran, M., & Almusharraf, N. (2024). Digital learning demand and applicability of Quality 4.0 for future education: A systematic review. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy (iJEP), 14(4), 38–53. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijep.v14i4.48847
- Jaber, H., Marle, F., Vidal, L. A., & Didiez, L. (2018). Criticality and propagation analysis of impacts between project deliverables. Research in Engineering Design, 29(1), 87-106.
- Jacob, M., & Hellström, T. (2023). Affording excellence: What does excellence funding do for researchers? Policy Studies, 46(1), 83–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2023.2267458
- Jędrusik, A. (2024). Project risk management based on known project management methodologies. European Research Studies Journal, 27(4), 14–24.
- Jolivet, R. B. (2024). Lessons from a first decade in European science policy. European Review, 32(4), 446-452. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1062798724000279
- Komsiyah, I. (2023). Control quality of e-learning implementation management. Al-Ishlah: Jurnal Pendidikan, 15(2), 1881–1887. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v15i2.2972
- Kozień, E. (2018). Quality of project financed by the European Union structural funds. MATEC Web of Conferences, 183, Article 04006. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201818304006
- Laurett, R., & Mendes, L. (2019). EFQM model’s application in the context of higher education: A systematic review of the literature and agenda for future research. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 36(2), 257–285. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQRM-12-2017-0282
- Lengyelová, K., Dimopoulou, N., (2023) Benchmarking of the e-Learning Quality Assurance in Vocational Education and Training: Project Results. Quality Innovation Prosperity. 27(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.12776/qip.v27i2.1855
- Leszczyna, R. (2021). Aiming at methods’ wider adoption: Applicability determinants and metrics. Computer Science Review, 40, 100387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosrev.2021.100387
- Lu, C. (2024). Professional Education in China. In: Liu, N., Feng, Z., Wang, Q. (eds) Education in China and the World. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-5861-0_7
- Münch, F. (2020). Le design-en-action: Catalyst for the success of multicultural team management [Doctoral dissertation, CERAG - Centre d’études et de recherches appliquées à la gestion].
- Muenzen, K. D., Amendola, L. M., Kauffman, T. L., Mittendorf, K. F., Bensen, J. T., Chen, F., Green, R., Powell, B. C., Kvale, M., Angelo, F., Farnan, L., Fullerton, S. M., Robinson, J. O., Li, T., Murali, P., Lawlor, J. M. J., Ou, J., Hindorff, L. A., Jarvik, G. P., & Crosslin, D. R. (2022). Lessons learned and recommendations for data coordination in collaborative research: The CSER consortium experience. HGG Advances, 3(3), 100120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xhgg.2022.100120
- Nagar, J. P., Breschi, S., & Fosfuri, A. (2024). ERC science and invention: Does ERC break free from the EU Paradox? Research Policy, 53(8), 105038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2024.105038
- Newton, V., Greenberg, A., & See, J. (2017). Project management implications and implementation roadmap of human readiness levels. In International Conference on HCI in Business, Government, and Organizations (pp. 99-111). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
- O’Kane, C., Zhang, J. A., Haar, J., & et al. (2023). How scientists interpret and address funding criteria: Value creation and undesirable side effects. Small Business Economics, 61, 799–826. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-022-00697-4
- OECD. (2008). Higher Education Management and Policy, 20(3). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/hemp-v20-3-en
- Oldoni, E., Saunders, G., Bietrix, F., Garcia Bermejo, M. L., Niehues, A., ’t Hoen, P. A. C., Nordlund, J., Hajduch, M., Scherer, A., Kivinen, K., Pitkänen, E., Mäkela, T. P., Gut, I., Scollen, S., Kozera, Ł., Esteller, M., Shi, L., Ussi, A., Andreu, A. L., & van Gool, A. J. (2022). Tackling the translational challenges of multi-omics research in the realm of European personalised medicine: A workshop report. Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences, 9, 974799. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmolb.2022.974799
- Olsson, N. O. E., Nyström, J., & Pyddoke, R. (2019). Governance regimes for large transport infrastructure investment projects: Comparative analysis of Norway and Sweden. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 7(4), 837–848. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2019.07.011
- Ouabira, M. M., & Fakhravar, H. (2021). Effective project management and the role of quality assurance throughout the project life cycle. European Journal of Engineering and Technology Research, 6(5), 84–88. https://doi.org/10.24018/ejeng.2021.6.5.2345
- Parekh, K., & Na, P. (2025). Managing Onshore-Offshore QA Teams: Effective Communication and Collaboration Strategies for Global Projects. International Journal of Research in Modern Engineering & Emerging Technology, 13(3), 413–423. https://doi.org/10.63345/ijrmeet.org.v13.i3.27
- Paprica, P. A. (2021). Risks for academic research projects: An empirical study of perceived negative risks and possible responses. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2103.08048
- Pößneck, J., Kabisch, S., Kowaltowski, D. C. C. K., & et al. (2024). Knowledge sharing through scenario development: Experiences of an interdisciplinary and international research project. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 49(5), 532–549. https://doi.org/10.1177/03080188241291828
- Prisacariu, A. (2015). New perspectives of quality assurance in European higher education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 180, 119–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.02.094
- Reaiche, C., & Papavasiliou, S. (2022). Management methods for complex projects. James Cook University. https://doi.org/10.25120/p4yc-gksq
- Reaiche, C., Papavasiliou, S., & Anglani, N. (2022). Risk assessment and quality project management. James Cook University eBooks. https://jcu.pressbooks.pub/pmriskquality
- Rodríguez-Rivero, R., Ortiz-Marcos, I., Romero, J., & Ballesteros-Sánchez, L. (2020). Finding the links between risk management and project success: Evidence from international development projects in Colombia. Sustainability, 12(21), 9294. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12219294
- Roehrich, J. K., Kalra, J., Squire, B., & Davies, A. (2023). Network orchestration in a large inter-organizational project. Journal of Operations Management, 69(7), 1078–1099. https://doi.org/10.1002/joom.1237
- Samuel, S., & Farrer, H. (2025). Integrating the PDCA cycle for continuous improvement and academic quality enhancement in higher education. Journal of Comparative & International Higher Education, 17(2), Article 12. https://doi.org/10.64899/2151-0407.1594
- Santos, R., & Abreu, A. (2019). EFQM model implementation in a Portuguese higher education institution. Open Engineering, 9(1), 99–108. https://doi.org/10.1515/eng-2019-0012
- Santokhee, A., Augusto, J. C., & Brodie, L. (2024). Towards engineering higher quality intelligent environments: A multi case study approach. Software Quality Journal, 32, 1075–1135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11219-024-09678-0
- Serra, F., Peralta, V., Marotta, A., & Marcel, P. (2022). Use of context in data quality management: A systematic literature review. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2204.10655
- Sesar, V., & Hunjet, A. (2021). The practice of continuous improvement behaviours in manufacturing companies with ISO 9001. DIEM: Dubrovnik International Economic Meeting, 6(1), 147-155. https://doi.org/10.17818/DIEM/2021/1.15
- Siakas, K., Georgiadou, E., Rahanu, H., Siakas, E., Meggoudis, N., & Siakas, D. (2024). Overcoming obstacles in global requirements elicitation: A multicultural perspective. Journal of Software Engineering Research and Development, 12(1), 6:1–6:27. https://doi.org/10.5753/jserd.2024.2552
- Sørensen, M. P., Ravn, T., Bendtsen, A. K., & et al. (2021). D5.2: Report on the results of the focus group interviews. EU Horizon 2020 Project SUPER_MoRRI. https://www.sops4ri.eu/wpcontent/uploads/D5.2_Report-on-the-Results-of-the-Focus-Group-Interviews.pdf
- Sprague Martinez, L., Howard, R. C., Schotland, M., & colleagues. (2023). Community engagement and financial arrangements: Navigating institutional change. Journal of Clinical and Translational Science, 7(1), e261. https://doi.org/10.1017/cts.2023.683
- Stenfors, T., Kajamaa, A., & Bennett, D. (2020). How to … assess the quality of qualitative research. The Clinical Teacher, 17(6), 596–599. https://doi.org/10.1111/tct.13242
- Szczepaniak, W. (2020). Safety of the EU project management system in public universities. System Safety: Human - Technical Facility - Environment, 2(1), 39–46. https://doi.org/10.2478/czoto-2020-0006
- Szczepaniak, W. (2021). Planning the costs of EU projects at state universities [Planowanie kosztów w projektach unijnych na uczelniach publicznych]. Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu = Research Papers of Wrocław University of Economics, 65(2), 150–158.
- Szczepaniak, W. (2020). Safety of the EU project management system in public universities. System Safety: Human - Technical Facility - Environment, 2(1), 39–46. https://doi.org/10.2478/czoto-2020-0006
- Taherdoost, H. (2024). Risk management in R&D projects. In Innovation through research and development; 247–269. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-52565-0_12
- Tarazona, S., Balzano-Nogueira, L., Gómez-Cabrero, D., & et al. (2020). Harmonization of quality metrics and power calculation in multi-omic studies. Nature Communications, 11, 3092. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-16937-8
- Turner, R. (2020). How does governance influence decision making on projects and in project-based organizations? Project Management Journal, 51(6), 670–684. https://doi.org/10.1177/8756972820939769
- Unterhitzenberger, C., & Moeller, D. (2021). Fair project governance: An organisational justice approach to project governance. International Journal of Project Management, 39(6), 683–696. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2021.06.003
- Vukomanovic, M., Radujkovic, M., & Nahod, M. M. (2014). EFQM excellence model as the TQM model of the construction industry of southeastern Europe. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 20(1), 70–81. https://doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2013.843582
- Wilsdon, J., & de Rijcke, S. (2019). Europe the rule-maker. Nature, 569(7757), 479-481.https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-01568-x
- Woelert, P. (2023). Administrative burden in higher education institutions: A conceptualisation and a research agenda. Tertiary Education and Management, 29(4), 409–422. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2023.2190967
- Wolski, M., Walter, B., Kupiński, S., & Chojnacki, J. (2017). Software quality model for a research-driven organization—An experience report. Journal of Software: Evolution and Process, 29(11), e1911. https://doi.org/10.1002/smr.1911
- Yadav, D. (2022). Criteria for good qualitative research: A comprehensive review. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 31, 679–689. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-021-00619-0
- Yoshizawa, G., Shinomiya, N., Kawamoto, S., Kawahara, N., Kiga, D., Hanaki, K. I., & Minari, J. (2024). Limiting open science? Three approaches to bottom-up governance of dual-use research of concern. Pathogens and Global Health, 118(4), 285–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/20477724.2023.2265626
- Yu, Y., Mai, Y., Zheng, Y., & et al. (2024). Assessing and mitigating batch effects in large-scale omics studies. Genome Biology, 25, 254. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-024-03401-9
- Yu, Y., Zhang, N., Mai, Y., & et al. (2023). Correcting batch effects in large-scale multiomics studies using a reference-material-based ratio method. Genome Biology, 24, 201. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-023-03047-z