Quality Assurance in European Projects: Analysis, Challenges, and Best Practices

Spulber, Diana; Siri, Anna

doi:10.2478/gssfj-2024-0012

Abstract

Quality Assurance (QA) is an essential component for the success and effectiveness of European projects, which are characterized by intrinsic complexity, multinational collaborations, and the management of structural funds. This article explores the role of QA, outlining its theoretical framework, analyzing specific challenges, and presenting best practices adopted to mitigate them. Through the examination of case studies, the adaptability and relevance of QA in various sectors funded by the European Union are highlighted, integrating a critical reflection on the current debate regarding the upcoming Framework Programme 10 (Horizon Europe 2028–2034) and the positions of the European University Association. The article concludes with a discussion of future prospects and emerging areas of research, emphasizing how QA can act not only as a management tool but also as a systemic guarantee of autonomy, transparency, and scientific excellence.

References

Abou El-Komboz, L., & Goldbeck, M. (2024). Virtually borderless? Cultural proximity and international collaboration of developers. Economics Letters, 244, Article 111951.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2024.111951
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Aagaard, K., Mongeon, P., Ramos-Vielba, I., & Thomas, D. A. (2021). Getting to the bottom of research funding: Acknowledging the complexity of funding dynamics. PLOS ONE, 16(5), e0251488. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0251488
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Akkerman, S., Admiraal, W., Brekelmans, M., & et al. (2008). Auditing quality of research in social sciences. Quality & Quantity, 42, 257–274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-006-9044-4
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Alsadi, N., & Norhayatizakuan, N. (2021). The impact of risk management practices on the performance of construction projects. Studies of Applied Economics, 39(4). https://doi.org/10.25115/eea.v39i4.4164
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Anglani, F., Pennetta, S., Reaiche, C., & Boyle, S. (2023). Crossing digital frontiers with cultural intelligence - a new paradigm for project managers. International Journal of Project Management, 41(8), 102543.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2023.102543
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Badea, A. R., & Feeney, O. (2025). Genome editing dilemma: Navigating dual-use potential and charting the path forward. Bioethical Inquiry, 22, 101–110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-024-10358-8
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bartel-Radic, A., & Munch, F. (2023). Cross-cultural boundary spanning activities in a global team: Insights from an ethnographic case study. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management.https://doi.org/10.1177/14705958231185432
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Becker, R. (2017). “The European Approach for Quality Assurance of Joint Programmes” 2017https://ehea.info/media.ehea.info/file/20171109-10Tartu/16/9/PLA_JointProgrammes_Report31102017_849169.pdf
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bento, S., Pereira, L., Gonçalves, R., Dias, Á., & Costa, R. L. D. (2022). Artificial intelligence in project management: systematic literature review. International Journal of Technology Intelligence and Planning, 13(2), 143-163
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Brits, H., & du Plessis, L. (2007). Application of focus group interviews for quality management: An action research project. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 20(2), 117-126.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bruzzone, F., & Nocera, S. (2020). Some considerations on the role of universities and research centers in EU-funded sustainable mobility projects. In O. Gervasi et al. (Eds.), Computational science and its applications–ICCSA 2020. Lecture notes in computer science (Vol. 12250). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58802-1_15
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Cheng, C.-C., Huang, K.-H., & Lin, Y.-K. (2023). Facilitating sustainable development of preschools: A system thinking training project in Taiwan. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 81(5), 598–610.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Cheng, C., Messerschmidt, L., Bravo, I., & et al. (2024). A general primer for data harmonization. Scientific Data, 11, 152. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-024-02956-3
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Churchill, N. (1988). Quality assurance—An effective project management technique. International Journal of Project Management, 6(4), 241–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/0263-7863(88)90009-9
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Díez, F., Villa, A., López Vélez, A. L., & Iraurgi, I. (2020). Impact of quality management systems in the performance of educational centers: Educational policies and management processes. Heliyon, 6(4), e03824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03824
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Domínguez, E., Pérez, B., Rubio, Á. L., & Zapata, M. A. (2019). A taxonomy for key performance indicators management. Computer Standards & Interfaces, 64, 24-40.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
European University Association (EUA). (2025). Horizon Europe 2028–2034: EUA analysis of the European Commission’s proposal. EUA.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Fishberg, R. (2022). EU social science collaborations as unequal Europeanisation: An ethnographic study of people and practices in EU-funded research (Doctoral dissertation). Roskilde University.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Forskning.RUC.https://rucforsk.ruc.dk/ws/portalfiles/portal/89342001/Rachel_Fishberg_PhD_Dissertation_Bortredigeret.pdf
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Famularo, J.(2023). Corporate social responsibility communication in the ICT sector: digital issues, greenwashing, and materiality. Int J Corporate Soc Responsibility 8, 8 https://doi.org/10.1186/s40991-023-00082-8
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Garousi, V., Borg, M., & Oivo, M. (2020). Practical relevance of software engineering research: Synthesizing the community’s voice. Empirical Software Engineering, 25, 1687-1754.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-020-09803-0
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Gigerenzer, G., Allen, C., Gaillard, S., Goldstone, R. L., Haaf, J., Holmes, W. R., Kashima, Y., Motz, B., Musslick, S., & Stefan, A. (2025). Alternative models of funding curiosity-driven research. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 122(5), e2401237121. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2401237121
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Gordieiev, O., Kharchenko, V., Fominykh, N., & Sklyar, V. (2014). Evolution of software quality models in context of the standard ISO 25010. In W. Zamojski, J. Mazurkiewicz, J. Sugier, T. Walkowiak, & J. Kacprzyk (Eds.), Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Dependability and Complex Systems (DepCoS-RELCOMEX 2014). Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing (Vol. 286). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07013-1_21
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Grigore, M. C., & Ionescu, S. (2019). Key Performance Indicators for Project Monitoring and controlling with focus on resource allocation and Quality Assurance - research Study. In International Conference on Management and Industrial Engineering (No. 9, pp. 512-526). Niculescu Publishing House.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Gronbaek, D. J. V. H. (2003). A European Research Council: An idea whose time has come? Science and Public Policy, 30(6), 391–404. https://doi.org/10.3152/147154303781780263
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hähnel, M. (2024). Conceptualizing dual use: A multidimensional approach. Research Ethics, 21(2), 205–227. https://doi.org/10.1177/17470161241261466
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Helm, P., de Götzen, A., Cernuzzi, L., Hume, A., Diwakar, S., Ruiz Correa, S., & Gatica-Perez, D. (2023). Diversity and neocolonialism in Big Data research: Avoiding extractivism while struggling with paternalism. Big Data & Society, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517231206802
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hollmann, S., Regierer, B., Bechis, J., Tobin, L., & D’Elia, D. (2022). Ten simple rules on how to develop a stakeholder engagement plan. PLOS Computational Biology, 18(10), e1010520. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010520
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Høyland, S. A., Hagen, J. M., & Engelbach, W. (2017). Developing and applying a framework for assessing the research quality of qualitative project methods in the EU project SECUR-ED. SAGE Open, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244017710291
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Huang. Y., et al., (2024). ISCom: Interest-Aware Semantic Communication Scheme for Point Cloud Video Streaming on Metaverse XR Devices, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 42 (4) 1003-1021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/JSAC.2023.3345430
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Imran, M., & Almusharraf, N. (2024). Digital learning demand and applicability of Quality 4.0 for future education: A systematic review. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy (iJEP), 14(4), 38–53. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijep.v14i4.48847
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Jaber, H., Marle, F., Vidal, L. A., & Didiez, L. (2018). Criticality and propagation analysis of impacts between project deliverables. Research in Engineering Design, 29(1), 87-106.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Jacob, M., & Hellström, T. (2023). Affording excellence: What does excellence funding do for researchers? Policy Studies, 46(1), 83–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2023.2267458
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Jędrusik, A. (2024). Project risk management based on known project management methodologies. European Research Studies Journal, 27(4), 14–24.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Jolivet, R. B. (2024). Lessons from a first decade in European science policy. European Review, 32(4), 446-452. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1062798724000279
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Komsiyah, I. (2023). Control quality of e-learning implementation management. Al-Ishlah: Jurnal Pendidikan, 15(2), 1881–1887. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v15i2.2972
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kozień, E. (2018). Quality of project financed by the European Union structural funds. MATEC Web of Conferences, 183, Article 04006. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201818304006
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Laurett, R., & Mendes, L. (2019). EFQM model’s application in the context of higher education: A systematic review of the literature and agenda for future research. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 36(2), 257–285. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQRM-12-2017-0282
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lengyelová, K., Dimopoulou, N., (2023) Benchmarking of the e-Learning Quality Assurance in Vocational Education and Training: Project Results. Quality Innovation Prosperity. 27(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.12776/qip.v27i2.1855
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Leszczyna, R. (2021). Aiming at methods’ wider adoption: Applicability determinants and metrics. Computer Science Review, 40, 100387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosrev.2021.100387
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lu, C. (2024). Professional Education in China. In: Liu, N., Feng, Z., Wang, Q. (eds) Education in China and the World. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-5861-0_7
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Münch, F. (2020). Le design-en-action: Catalyst for the success of multicultural team management [Doctoral dissertation, CERAG - Centre d’études et de recherches appliquées à la gestion].
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Muenzen, K. D., Amendola, L. M., Kauffman, T. L., Mittendorf, K. F., Bensen, J. T., Chen, F., Green, R., Powell, B. C., Kvale, M., Angelo, F., Farnan, L., Fullerton, S. M., Robinson, J. O., Li, T., Murali, P., Lawlor, J. M. J., Ou, J., Hindorff, L. A., Jarvik, G. P., & Crosslin, D. R. (2022). Lessons learned and recommendations for data coordination in collaborative research: The CSER consortium experience. HGG Advances, 3(3), 100120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xhgg.2022.100120
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Nagar, J. P., Breschi, S., & Fosfuri, A. (2024). ERC science and invention: Does ERC break free from the EU Paradox? Research Policy, 53(8), 105038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2024.105038
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Newton, V., Greenberg, A., & See, J. (2017). Project management implications and implementation roadmap of human readiness levels. In International Conference on HCI in Business, Government, and Organizations (pp. 99-111). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
O’Kane, C., Zhang, J. A., Haar, J., & et al. (2023). How scientists interpret and address funding criteria: Value creation and undesirable side effects. Small Business Economics, 61, 799–826. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-022-00697-4
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
OECD. (2008). Higher Education Management and Policy, 20(3). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/hemp-v20-3-en
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Oldoni, E., Saunders, G., Bietrix, F., Garcia Bermejo, M. L., Niehues, A., ’t Hoen, P. A. C., Nordlund, J., Hajduch, M., Scherer, A., Kivinen, K., Pitkänen, E., Mäkela, T. P., Gut, I., Scollen, S., Kozera, Ł., Esteller, M., Shi, L., Ussi, A., Andreu, A. L., & van Gool, A. J. (2022). Tackling the translational challenges of multi-omics research in the realm of European personalised medicine: A workshop report. Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences, 9, 974799. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmolb.2022.974799
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Olsson, N. O. E., Nyström, J., & Pyddoke, R. (2019). Governance regimes for large transport infrastructure investment projects: Comparative analysis of Norway and Sweden. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 7(4), 837–848. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2019.07.011
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ouabira, M. M., & Fakhravar, H. (2021). Effective project management and the role of quality assurance throughout the project life cycle. European Journal of Engineering and Technology Research, 6(5), 84–88. https://doi.org/10.24018/ejeng.2021.6.5.2345
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Parekh, K., & Na, P. (2025). Managing Onshore-Offshore QA Teams: Effective Communication and Collaboration Strategies for Global Projects. International Journal of Research in Modern Engineering & Emerging Technology, 13(3), 413–423. https://doi.org/10.63345/ijrmeet.org.v13.i3.27
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Paprica, P. A. (2021). Risks for academic research projects: An empirical study of perceived negative risks and possible responses. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2103.08048
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Pößneck, J., Kabisch, S., Kowaltowski, D. C. C. K., & et al. (2024). Knowledge sharing through scenario development: Experiences of an interdisciplinary and international research project. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 49(5), 532–549. https://doi.org/10.1177/03080188241291828
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Prisacariu, A. (2015). New perspectives of quality assurance in European higher education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 180, 119–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.02.094
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Reaiche, C., & Papavasiliou, S. (2022). Management methods for complex projects. James Cook University. https://doi.org/10.25120/p4yc-gksq
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Reaiche, C., Papavasiliou, S., & Anglani, N. (2022). Risk assessment and quality project management. James Cook University eBooks. https://jcu.pressbooks.pub/pmriskquality
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Rodríguez-Rivero, R., Ortiz-Marcos, I., Romero, J., & Ballesteros-Sánchez, L. (2020). Finding the links between risk management and project success: Evidence from international development projects in Colombia. Sustainability, 12(21), 9294. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12219294
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Roehrich, J. K., Kalra, J., Squire, B., & Davies, A. (2023). Network orchestration in a large inter-organizational project. Journal of Operations Management, 69(7), 1078–1099. https://doi.org/10.1002/joom.1237
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Samuel, S., & Farrer, H. (2025). Integrating the PDCA cycle for continuous improvement and academic quality enhancement in higher education. Journal of Comparative & International Higher Education, 17(2), Article 12. https://doi.org/10.64899/2151-0407.1594
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Santos, R., & Abreu, A. (2019). EFQM model implementation in a Portuguese higher education institution. Open Engineering, 9(1), 99–108. https://doi.org/10.1515/eng-2019-0012
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Santokhee, A., Augusto, J. C., & Brodie, L. (2024). Towards engineering higher quality intelligent environments: A multi case study approach. Software Quality Journal, 32, 1075–1135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11219-024-09678-0
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Serra, F., Peralta, V., Marotta, A., & Marcel, P. (2022). Use of context in data quality management: A systematic literature review. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2204.10655
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Sesar, V., & Hunjet, A. (2021). The practice of continuous improvement behaviours in manufacturing companies with ISO 9001. DIEM: Dubrovnik International Economic Meeting, 6(1), 147-155. https://doi.org/10.17818/DIEM/2021/1.15
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Siakas, K., Georgiadou, E., Rahanu, H., Siakas, E., Meggoudis, N., & Siakas, D. (2024). Overcoming obstacles in global requirements elicitation: A multicultural perspective. Journal of Software Engineering Research and Development, 12(1), 6:1–6:27. https://doi.org/10.5753/jserd.2024.2552
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Sørensen, M. P., Ravn, T., Bendtsen, A. K., & et al. (2021). D5.2: Report on the results of the focus group interviews. EU Horizon 2020 Project SUPER_MoRRI. https://www.sops4ri.eu/wpcontent/uploads/D5.2_Report-on-the-Results-of-the-Focus-Group-Interviews.pdf
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Sprague Martinez, L., Howard, R. C., Schotland, M., & colleagues. (2023). Community engagement and financial arrangements: Navigating institutional change. Journal of Clinical and Translational Science, 7(1), e261. https://doi.org/10.1017/cts.2023.683
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Stenfors, T., Kajamaa, A., & Bennett, D. (2020). How to … assess the quality of qualitative research. The Clinical Teacher, 17(6), 596–599. https://doi.org/10.1111/tct.13242
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Szczepaniak, W. (2020). Safety of the EU project management system in public universities. System Safety: Human - Technical Facility - Environment, 2(1), 39–46. https://doi.org/10.2478/czoto-2020-0006
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Szczepaniak, W. (2021). Planning the costs of EU projects at state universities [Planowanie kosztów w projektach unijnych na uczelniach publicznych]. Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu = Research Papers of Wrocław University of Economics, 65(2), 150–158.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Szczepaniak, W. (2020). Safety of the EU project management system in public universities. System Safety: Human - Technical Facility - Environment, 2(1), 39–46. https://doi.org/10.2478/czoto-2020-0006
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Taherdoost, H. (2024). Risk management in R&D projects. In Innovation through research and development; 247–269. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-52565-0_12
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Tarazona, S., Balzano-Nogueira, L., Gómez-Cabrero, D., & et al. (2020). Harmonization of quality metrics and power calculation in multi-omic studies. Nature Communications, 11, 3092. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-16937-8
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Turner, R. (2020). How does governance influence decision making on projects and in project-based organizations? Project Management Journal, 51(6), 670–684. https://doi.org/10.1177/8756972820939769
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Unterhitzenberger, C., & Moeller, D. (2021). Fair project governance: An organisational justice approach to project governance. International Journal of Project Management, 39(6), 683–696. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2021.06.003
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Vukomanovic, M., Radujkovic, M., & Nahod, M. M. (2014). EFQM excellence model as the TQM model of the construction industry of southeastern Europe. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 20(1), 70–81. https://doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2013.843582
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Wilsdon, J., & de Rijcke, S. (2019). Europe the rule-maker. Nature, 569(7757), 479-481.https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-01568-x
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Woelert, P. (2023). Administrative burden in higher education institutions: A conceptualisation and a research agenda. Tertiary Education and Management, 29(4), 409–422. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2023.2190967
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Wolski, M., Walter, B., Kupiński, S., & Chojnacki, J. (2017). Software quality model for a research-driven organization—An experience report. Journal of Software: Evolution and Process, 29(11), e1911. https://doi.org/10.1002/smr.1911
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Yadav, D. (2022). Criteria for good qualitative research: A comprehensive review. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 31, 679–689. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-021-00619-0
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Yoshizawa, G., Shinomiya, N., Kawamoto, S., Kawahara, N., Kiga, D., Hanaki, K. I., & Minari, J. (2024). Limiting open science? Three approaches to bottom-up governance of dual-use research of concern. Pathogens and Global Health, 118(4), 285–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/20477724.2023.2265626
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Yu, Y., Mai, Y., Zheng, Y., & et al. (2024). Assessing and mitigating batch effects in large-scale omics studies. Genome Biology, 25, 254. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-024-03401-9
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Yu, Y., Zhang, N., Mai, Y., & et al. (2023). Correcting batch effects in large-scale multiomics studies using a reference-material-based ratio method. Genome Biology, 24, 201. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-023-03047-z
Search in Google Scholar Back to article

Quality Assurance in European Projects: Analysis, Challenges, and Best Practices

Abstract

Paradigm

My account