Have a personal or library account? Click to login

Influence of hypergravity on root growth phenotype and physio-biochemical parameters in sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.)

Open Access
|Dec 2024

Figures & Tables

Figure 1.

The study evaluated different levels of hypergravity intensities on root, shoot, and seedling vigor index of sorghum seedlings under laboratory conditions using the between-paper method. (a) Visual representation of qualitative root and shoot phenotype responses to 20, 40, 80, 100, 250, 500, 1000, 2500, and 5000-times gravity (g) for a set period of one hour was provided. (b) Variability (shown in red box plot) in the shoot length phenotype among the ten treatments was analyzed. (c) Variability (shown in green box plot) among the ten treatments for root length phenotype was examined. (d) Variability (shown in orange box plot) among the 10 treatments for total seedling length. (e) Variability (illustrated in pink box plot) in the seedling vigor index among the ten treatments was also analyzed. In each test group, 30 seedlings were utilized in triplicates, and such four independent experiments were employed for statistical analysis. The resultant data underwent one-way ANOVA using SPSS – version 20.00. Statistical significance * (p ≤ 0.05), ** (p ≤ 0.01), *** (p ≤ 0.001).
The study evaluated different levels of hypergravity intensities on root, shoot, and seedling vigor index of sorghum seedlings under laboratory conditions using the between-paper method. (a) Visual representation of qualitative root and shoot phenotype responses to 20, 40, 80, 100, 250, 500, 1000, 2500, and 5000-times gravity (g) for a set period of one hour was provided. (b) Variability (shown in red box plot) in the shoot length phenotype among the ten treatments was analyzed. (c) Variability (shown in green box plot) among the ten treatments for root length phenotype was examined. (d) Variability (shown in orange box plot) among the 10 treatments for total seedling length. (e) Variability (illustrated in pink box plot) in the seedling vigor index among the ten treatments was also analyzed. In each test group, 30 seedlings were utilized in triplicates, and such four independent experiments were employed for statistical analysis. The resultant data underwent one-way ANOVA using SPSS – version 20.00. Statistical significance * (p ≤ 0.05), ** (p ≤ 0.01), *** (p ≤ 0.001).

Figure 2.

The varied response observed among different sorghum genotypes to hypergravity was examined in laboratory conditions using the between-paper method. (a) A qualitative depiction of hypergravity-induced (1000g, 1 hr) increased root and shoot length phenotypes at the seedling stage were documented on the final count (10th day) of nine different genotypes of sorghum seedlings. Hypergravity-induced alterations in shoot length (b), root length (c), and seedling vigor index (d) of different genotypes of sorghum seedlings were analyzed. The resultant data underwent an independent sample t-test [N=360] using SPSS – version 20.00. Statistical significance * (p ≤ 0.05), ** (p ≤ 0.01), *** (p ≤ 0.001).
The varied response observed among different sorghum genotypes to hypergravity was examined in laboratory conditions using the between-paper method. (a) A qualitative depiction of hypergravity-induced (1000g, 1 hr) increased root and shoot length phenotypes at the seedling stage were documented on the final count (10th day) of nine different genotypes of sorghum seedlings. Hypergravity-induced alterations in shoot length (b), root length (c), and seedling vigor index (d) of different genotypes of sorghum seedlings were analyzed. The resultant data underwent an independent sample t-test [N=360] using SPSS – version 20.00. Statistical significance * (p ≤ 0.05), ** (p ≤ 0.01), *** (p ≤ 0.001).

Figure 3.

Changes in seedling growth characteristics of three selected sorghum genotypes were examined under greenhouse conditions. (a) A hypergravity-induced (1000g, 1 hr) enhanced seedling growth phenotype was recorded at the seedling growth stage (10th day) of sorghum grown in a greenhouse. Hypergravity-induced changes in shoot length (b), root length (c), seedling vigor index (d), seedling fresh weight (e), and seedling dry weight (f) of selected genotypes of sorghum seedlings were analyzed. The resultant data underwent an independent sample t-test [N=96] using SPSS – version 20.00. Statistical significance * (p ≤ 0.05), ** (p ≤ 0.01), *** (p ≤ 0.001).
Changes in seedling growth characteristics of three selected sorghum genotypes were examined under greenhouse conditions. (a) A hypergravity-induced (1000g, 1 hr) enhanced seedling growth phenotype was recorded at the seedling growth stage (10th day) of sorghum grown in a greenhouse. Hypergravity-induced changes in shoot length (b), root length (c), seedling vigor index (d), seedling fresh weight (e), and seedling dry weight (f) of selected genotypes of sorghum seedlings were analyzed. The resultant data underwent an independent sample t-test [N=96] using SPSS – version 20.00. Statistical significance * (p ≤ 0.05), ** (p ≤ 0.01), *** (p ≤ 0.001).

Figure 4.

(a) Phenotypic changes were observed at the 55-day-old vegetative growth stage of three selected sorghum genotypes under greenhouse conditions. (b) Hypergravity-induced alterations in root length, (c) root volume, (d) root fresh weight, (e) root dry weight, and (f) secondary roots were analyzed. (g) Hypergravity-induced alterations in shoot length, and (h) shoot dry weight were also assessed. The resultant data underwent an independent sample t-test [N=48] using SPSS – version 20.00. Statistical significance * (p ≤ 0.05), ** (p ≤ 0.01), *** (p ≤ 0.001).
(a) Phenotypic changes were observed at the 55-day-old vegetative growth stage of three selected sorghum genotypes under greenhouse conditions. (b) Hypergravity-induced alterations in root length, (c) root volume, (d) root fresh weight, (e) root dry weight, and (f) secondary roots were analyzed. (g) Hypergravity-induced alterations in shoot length, and (h) shoot dry weight were also assessed. The resultant data underwent an independent sample t-test [N=48] using SPSS – version 20.00. Statistical significance * (p ≤ 0.05), ** (p ≤ 0.01), *** (p ≤ 0.001).

Figure 5.

Hypergravity induces dynamic changes in phytohormone levels in the roots of sorghum seedlings, as profiled on the 10th day after exposure. The resultant data underwent an independent sample t-test using SPSS – version 20.00. Statistical significance * (p ≤ 0.05), ** (p ≤ 0.01), *** (p ≤ 0.001).
Hypergravity induces dynamic changes in phytohormone levels in the roots of sorghum seedlings, as profiled on the 10th day after exposure. The resultant data underwent an independent sample t-test using SPSS – version 20.00. Statistical significance * (p ≤ 0.05), ** (p ≤ 0.01), *** (p ≤ 0.001).

Figure 6.

Qualitative image of nine different sorghum genotypes used for this study.
Qualitative image of nine different sorghum genotypes used for this study.

Supplementary Figure 1.

This experiment was grouped as below. Statistical superiority was identified using an independent ‘t’ test comparing control with hypergravity treatment.
This experiment was grouped as below. Statistical superiority was identified using an independent ‘t’ test comparing control with hypergravity treatment.

Response of different sorghum genotypes to hypergravity under laboratory conditions using between-paper-method_ Hypergravity-induced changes in germination, root, length, shoot, and seedling vigor index in different genotypes of sorghum seedlings were recorded on the final count (day 10) of 9 different genotypes of sorghum seedlings_ Resultant data was subjected to an independent sample t-test (four independent experimental groups of 30 seedlings in triplicate (30×3 = 90; 90×4 experiments = 360)) using SPSS – version 20_00_

GenotypesCtr (1g) Mean ± SEM1000g 1 hr Mean ± SEM% change over controlp-valuet-stat.
Germination (%)
SPV221791.5 ± 2.3392.25 ± 2.180.820.8350.313
DSV489.50 ± 1.4590.50 ± 1.201.120.8690.177
M35-194.50 ± 1.3393.75 ± 1.66−0.790.6650.469
SVD1418R89.50 ± 2.7291.50 ± 1.852.230.7090.404
KODMURKI LOCAL93.50 ± 1.5290.50 ± 3.84−3.210.5710.645
IS1855191.50 ± 1.5290.50 ± 2.33−1.090.7130.397
SVD1358R91.25 ± 1.5294.50 ± 1.333.560.8120.981
LAKMAPUR LOCAL93.75 ± 1.6689.50 ± 2.72−4.530.3820.548
CSV 29R91.50 ± 1.8593.50 ± 1.522.190.6170.261
Shoot length (cm)
SPV221710.56 ± 0.7012.13 ± 0.8314.920.0464.51
DSV414.38 ± 0.4314.69 ± 0.452.160.590.59
M35-112.38 ± 0.4414.38 ± 0.7416.160.0395.66
SVD1418R13.65 ± 0.3813.78 ± 0.350.920.610.56
KODMURKI LOCAL13.10 ± 0.5513.37 ± 0.862.020.321.17
IS1855111.75 ± 0.2712.12 ± 0.213.130.193.33
SVD1358R11.67 ± 0.3611.80 ± 0.731.160.420.94
LAKMAPUR LOCAL15.33 ± 0.3215.64 ± 0.542.060.313.15
CSV 29R12.48 ± 0.7812.62 ± 0.341.080.122.41
Root length (cm)
SPV221722.70 ± 0.8027.58 ± 0.4421.510.0164.86
DSV418.34 ± 0.4118.03 ± 0.18−1.680.132.00
M35-115.57 ± 0.4618.54 ± 1.2119.110.0186.93
SVD1418R19.15 ± 1.0919.19 ± 1.440.210.122.02
KODMURKI LOCAL22.23 ± 0.4422.50 ± 0.661.200.413.65
IS1855118.99 ± 0.4322.41 ± 0.6018.000.0305.25
SVD1358R23.33 ± 0.8823.48 ± 0.470.680.123.40
LAKMAPUR LOCAL18.42 ± 0.9818.57 ± 0.860.810.972.74
CSV 29R16.51 ± 0.5717.16 ± 1.043.890.463.05
Seedling vigour index (SVI)
SPV22173041.25 ± 39.63663.78 ± 26.420.470.0054.86
DSV42929.11 ± 60.42961.63 ± 51.41.110.701.93
M35-12640.16 ± 36.93085.71 ± 19.416.880.0065.995
SVD1418R2935.45 ± 13.13015.69 ± 18.62.730.125.19
KODMURKI LOCAL3303.27 ± 52.43245.50 ± 53.5−1.750.471.42
IS185512812.62 ± 36.33124.33 ± 25.711.080.014.355
SVD1358R3192.92 ± 22.33333.96 ± 21.64.420.092.61
LAKMAPUR LOCAL3163.19 ± 27.63061.30 ± 20.4−3.220.133.90
CSV 29R2652.75 ± 15.82785.28 ± 25.73.750.165.28
Total Seedling length (cm)
SPV221733.26 ± 0.5639.72 ± 0.2120.470.0054.86
DSV432.72 ± 0.1632.73 ± 0.091.110.701.93
M35-127.94 ± 0.2232.92 ± 0.1416.880.0065.995
SVD1418R32.80 ± 0.1432.97 ± 0.302.730.125.19
KODMURKI LOCAL35.33 ± 0.2235.87 ± 0.25−1.750.471.42
IS1855130.74 ± 0.3934.53 ± 0.1211.080.0014.355
SVD1358R34.99 ± 0.1935.28 ± 0.284.420.092.61
LAKMAPUR LOCAL33.74 ± 0.2534.20 ± 0.17−3.220.133.90
CSV 29R29.00 ± 0.4929.78 ± 0.663.750.165.28

Changes in germination, root, and shoot growth characteristics of three selected sorghum genotypes under greenhouse conditions_ Hypergravity-induced changes in germination (%), root length (cm), root volume (cm3), root fresh weight (gm), root dry weight (gm), number of secondary roots of selected genotypes of sorghum in greenhouse conditions recorded at the beginning of the reproductive phase (55th-day) of sorghum grown in a greenhouse_ The resultant data was subjected to an independent sample t-test [N=48] using SPSS – version 20_00_

GenotypesCtr (1g) Mean ± SEM1000g 1 hr Mean ± SEM% change over controlp-valuet-stat.
Germination (%)
M35-194.5 ± 1.3395.0 ± 1.660.530.5660.469
SPV221793.8 ± 1.5294.0 ± 3.840.270.1790.645
IS1855191.5 ± 1.5293.0 ± 2.331.640.4920.397
Root length (cm)
M35-164.9 ± 0.5977.5 ± 0.9619.330.01113.41
SPV2217155.0 ± 1.01180.7 ± 0.9816.620.01513.88
IS18551103.0 ± 0.8587.1 ± 0.35−18.250.01224.39
Root volume (cm3)
M35-136.6 ± 3.9643.0 ± 2.3417.420.0262.927
SPV221776.7 ± 1.1088.0 ± 2.5214.670.0252.964
IS1855143.6 ± 2.9541.2 ± 1.11−5.450.0119.571
Root fresh weight (gm)
M35-165.4 ± 0.8671.3 ± 0.5518.190.0111.32
SPV221769.0 ± 0.5879.4 ± 0.9815.080.01512.43
IS1855172.2 ± 0.5461.2 ± 0.32−7.090.0119.85
Root dry weight (gm)
M35-18.3 ± 1.359.3 ± 3.2812.350.0034.32
SPV221711.7 ± 2.7112.3 ± 2.874.910.2025.17
IS1855110.0 ± 1.4910.1 ± 2.160.050.1574.78
Number of secondary roots
M35-115.8 ± 1.5820.8 ± 4.7116.900.0144.431
SPV221723.8 ± 1.8325.5 ± 3.9310.870.0173.274
IS1855123.3 ± 1.6522.5 ± 1.47−3.230.0632.967
Shoot length (cm)
M35-1115.3 ± 7.2129.5 ± 7.6912.360.0254.333
SPV2217212.0 ± 13.5235.0 ± 12.910.850.0167.534
IS18551164.0 ± 10.5169.5 ± 17.23.350.0599.532
Number of leaves per plant
M35-109 ± 0.409.3 ± 0.512.780.1341.732
SPV221711 ± 0.4011.3 ± 0.542.270.2351.543
IS1855113 ± 0.8613.5 ± 0.123.850.3231.786
Shoot fresh weight (gm)
M35-1151.6 ± 1.9163.2 ± 1.37.650.0324.928
SPV2217217.6 ± 1.7236.4 ± 2.58.640.0231.206
IS18551188.6 ± 1.2199.8 ± 3.45.530.1292.863
Shoot dry weight (gm)
M35-120.6 ± 0.0822.8 ± 0.2510.440.025.23
SPV221734.9 ± 0.2737.5 ± 0.527.460.0177.121
IS1855125.8 ± 0.3726.5 ± 0.512.810.2044.439

Physio-biochemical screening of selected sorghum genotypes_ Total chlorophyll content was quantified in leaf tissue; EC and TDH activity were quantified in seeds; catalase and SOD enzyme activities were quantified in seedlings_ All biochemical assays were carried out in three replications and four independent experiments were used for an independent variable ‘T’ test analysis using SPSS – version 20_00 (T–tab_ 4_303)

Genotypes/parametersCtr (1g)1000g 1 hr.% change over controlp-valuet-stat.

Mean ± SEMMean ± SEM
Total chlorophyll content (mg g−1 of tissue)
M35-12.20 ± 0.192.76 ± 0.0425.870.017*5.68
SPV22172.36 ± 0.072.67 ± 0.0913.130.038*4.80
IS185512.70 ± 0.113.05 ± 0.0812.190.023*8.87
Electrical conductivity (dS/m)
M35–10.29 ± 0.0030.28 ± 0.080−2.550.538 NS0.70
SPV22170.36 ± 0.0100.33 ± 0.005−10.230.113 NS2.34
IS185510.23 ± 0.0100.21 ± 0.005−10.560.221 NS1.54
Total dehydrogenase (TDH)
M35-10.73 ± 0.020.89 ± 0.0121.910.010*8.80
SPV22170.74 ± 0.050.86 ± 0.0316.870.030*6.19
IS185510.81 ± 0.080.92 ± 0.0514.710.020*9.20
Catalase (U/ml of enzyme) of genotype M35-1
Root5.867 ± 0.0577.32 ± 0.16824.760.008*8.18
Shoot5.65 ± 0.1726.03 ± 0.2456.720.282NS1.26
Superoxide dismutase (SOD) (U/ml of enzyme) of genotype M35-1
Root1.41 ± 0.401.75 ± 0.07124.110.023*4.30
Shoot2.08 ± 0.0432.13 ± 0.082.40.589 NS0.60

Hypergravity elicits robust phytohormone dynamics in the root, profiled on the final count (day 10) of sorghum seedlings_ Resultant data was subjected to an independent sample t-test using SPSS – version 20_00_

HormonesPhytohormones (ng/gm of tissue)
Ctr (1g) Mean ± SEM1000g 1 hr. Mean ±SEM% change over controlp-valuet-stat.
Indole Acetic Acid (IAA)131 ± 1.54179 ± 7.3336.590.0196.396
Indole Butyric Acid (IBA)23.20 ± 0.3941.81 ± 0.2980.180.00038.18
Benzyl aminopurine (BAP)0.61 ± 0.030.54 ± 0.03−10.300.2711.278
Zeatin transe isomer28.05 ± 0.682.58 ± 0.09−90.810.00137.12
Trans zeatin Riboside (ZR)0.31 ± 0.020.40 ± 0.0330.660.0842.603
Gibberellic Acid 7 (GA7)0.07 ± 0.000.05 ± 0.00−21.510.0582.858
Gibberellic Acid 4 (GA4)3.13 ± 0.131.52 ± 0.09−51.610.00110.11
Gibberellic Acid 3 (GA3)0.93 ± 0.030.41 ± 0.02−55.750.00015.30
Abscisic Acid (ABA)2.37 ± 0.031.81 ± 0.06−23.400.0057.506
Salicylic Acid (SA)1046 ± 22.061650 ± 46.1657.730.00211.80
Cis-Jasmonate (cis-JA)22.35 ± 0.9529.27 ±0.2630.920.0146.992
Methyl-Jasmonate0.47 ± 0.010.87 ± 0.0187.130.00017.71

Changes in germination, root, and shoot growth characteristics of three selected sorghum genotypes under greenhouse conditions_ Hypergravity-induced (1000xg, 1 hr) changes in germination, root length (cm), shoot length (cm), seedling vigour index, seedling fresh weight (gm), seedling dry weight (gm) and phenotype recorded at seedling growth stage (10th-day) of sorghum grown in a greenhouse condition_ The resultant data was subjected to an independent sample t-test [N=96] using SPSS – version 20_00_

GenotypesCtr (1g) Mean ± SEM1000g 1 hr Mean ± SEM% change over controlp-valuet-stat.
Germination (%)
M35-187.8 ± 2.5189.5 ± 1.151.990.1450.361
SPV221796.5 ± 0.0093.0 ± 2.33−3.630.1160.11
IS1855193.5 ± 0.6694.3 ± 3.000.800.1390.108
Root length (cm)
M35-116.1 ± 0.4618.5 ± 1.0215.060.0106.072
SPV221715.4 ± 0.8217.5 ± 0.5813.610.0394.729
IS1855116.7 ± 0.4517.1 ± 0.272.550.1381.961
Shoot length (cm)
M35-18.8 ± 0.4110.0 ± 1.3514.570.0434.868
SPV22178.5 ± 1.449.4 ± 0.5610.950.0364.290
IS1855110.1 ± 0.2810.3 ± 0.951.490.0795.307
Seedling vigour index (SVI)
M35-12195.1 ± 24.42558.8 ± 20.916.570.0055.251
SPV22172422.0 ± 34.12662.7 ± 24.79.940.0292.325
IS185512635.8 ± 29.92751.4 ± 33.44.390.0741.504
Seedling fresh weight (gm)
M35-19.2 ± 0.2510.4 ± 0.7113.930.0392.293
SPV221711.2 ± 0.5212.3 ± 0.7010.540.0352.56
IS1855110.6 ± 0.1811.1 ± 0.235.200.0532.527
Seedling dry weight (gm)
M35-11.29 ± 0.521.49 ± 0.6015.560.0280.293
SPV22171.88 ± 0.302.10 ± 0.4812.000.0340.644
IS185511.41 ± 0.351.47 ± 0.474.790.1380.284

Seed Diameter and 100 Seed Weight Across Different Sorghum Genotypes_

Sl. No.Sorghum GenotypesSeed Diameter (mm)100 Seed Weight (g)
1SVD1418R1.63.85
2IS185511.32.67
3SVD1358R1.44.34
4DSV41.53.55
5LAKMAPUR LOCAL1.53.10
6SPV22171.64.15
7M35-11.64.16
8CSV 29R1.53.52
9KODMURKI LOCAL1.43.35

Varied hypergravity intensities evaluated for root, shoot, and seedling vigor index of sorghum seedlings in laboratory conditions_ In each test group (Control, 20, 40, 80, 100, 250, 500, 1000, 2500 and 5000g), four independent experimental groups of 30 seedlings in triplicate (30×3 = 90; 90×4 experiments = 360) were used for statistical analysis_ Resultant data was subjected to one-way ANOVA using SPSS – version 20_00_

Hyper g treatmentMean ± SEM% change over controlp-valueCal. FCD (5 %)CV (%)
Germination (%)
Ctr (1g)90.75±0.85--4.203.152.37
20g 1 hr90.75±1.430.001.000
40g 1 hr90.75±1.250.001.000
80g 1 hr94.75±0.254.410.221
100g 1 hr87.75±0.25−3.310.592
250g 1 hr89.75±0.25−1.100.999
500g 1 hr92.5±0.641.930.970
1000g 1 hr94.75±1.254.410.221
2500g 1 hr91.5±1.710.831.000
5000g 1 hr93.5±1.263.030.699
Shoot length (cm)
Ctr (1g)12.52±0.04--41.920.432.26
20g 1 hr12.96±0.083.510.491
40g 1 hr11.77±0.04−5.990.024
80g 1 hr12.99±0.123.770.394
100g 1 hr13.28±0.046.070.211
250g 1 hr13.07±0.084.430.200
500g 1 hr12.47±0.05−0.341.000
1000g 1 hr15.32±0.1722.380.011
2500g 1 hr12.27±0.07−2.000.959
5000g 1 hr13.29±0.036.150.239
Root length (cm)
Ctr (1g)19.53±0.35--15.671.083.61
20g 1 hr21.56±0.376.580.230
40g 1 hr21.17±0.398.420.101
80g 1 hr19.71±0.260.921.000
100g 1 hr20.05±0.442.700.992
250g 1 hr19.59±0.640.311.000
500g 1 hr19.03±0.54−2.560.994
1000g 1 hr23.97±0.3122.750.023
2500g 1 hr19.61±0.340.411.000
5000g 1 hr20.95±0.277.300.247
Seedling vigour index
Ctr (1g)2918.0±22.13--22.35138.943.15
20g 1 hr3043.0±41.234.280.171
40g 1 hr2914.7±7.57−0.111.000
80g 1 hr3099.5±35.746.220.063
100g 1 hr2850.7±40.23−2.300.973
250g 1 hr2980.5±20.432.140.974
500g 1 hr2963.7±40.381.571.000
1000g 1 hr3638.7±58.4524.700.001
2500g 1 hr2906.7±37.45−0.391.000
5000g 1 hr3117.7±27.986.850.059
Language: English
Page range: 177 - 197
Published on: Dec 31, 2024
Published by: American Society for Gravitational and Space Research
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 times per year

© 2024 Mahamed Ashiq I, Sana B Honnutagi, Ravikumar Hosamani, Deepthi R B, Basavalingayya K Swamy, Malarvizhi Sathasivam, Basavaraj Bagewadi, Uday G. Reddy, N. G Hanamaratti, published by American Society for Gravitational and Space Research
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.