Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Geography of representation in the 2024 European parliamentary elections Cover

Geography of representation in the 2024 European parliamentary elections

By:   
Open Access
|Jun 2026

References

  1. Alker HR, Russett BM, (1964), On measuring inequality. Behavioral Science, 9, (3):207–218. ISSN 1099-1743. doi: 10.1002/bs.3830090302.
  2. Allen T, Taagepera R, (2017), Seat allocation in federal second chambers: Logical models in Canada and Germany. Mathematical Social Sciences, 87:22–30. doi: 10.1016/j.mathsocsci. 2017.01.004.
  3. Andeweg R, Thomassen J, (2005), Modes of political representation: toward a new typology. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 30, (4):507–528. doi: 10.3162/036298005X201653.
  4. Balinski M, Young H, (1982), Fair Representation in the European Parliament. Journal of Common Market Studies, 20, (4: 361–373. doi: 10.1111/j.14685965.1982.tb00262.x.
  5. Balinski M, Young H, (2001), Fair Representation: Meeting the Ideal of One Man, One Vote.
  6. Baysal A, (2017), National Representation in European Democracy: Seat Apportionment in the European Parliament. Available at: https://eustudies.org/conference/papers/14.
  7. Cegiełka K, (2016), Degressively Proportional Apportionment of Seats in the European Parliament. From a Simple Idea to a Problematic Legal Rule. Mathematical Economics, 12, (19):15–30. doi: 10.15611/me.2016.12.02.
  8. Charvát J, (2022), EU Member States’ Representation in the European Parliament: the Politics of Seat Apportionment in a Historical Perspective. European Studies – The Review of European Law, Economics and Politics, 9, (1):154–177. doi: 10.2478/eustu-2022-0007.
  9. Charvát J, (2024), Degressively proportional representation in the European Parliament: European Union law versus reality. Parliaments, Estates and Representation, 44. doi: 10.1080/02606755.2024.2308350.
  10. Cowan S, (2015), Periodic Discordance Between Vote Equality and Representational Equality in the United States. Sociological Science, 2:442–453. doi: 10.15195/v2.a21.
  11. Dehousse F, (1953), Rapport de Fernand Dehousse sur les Institutions de la Communauté européenne.
  12. Dniestrzański P, (2013), Degressive Proportionality – Notes on the Ambiguity of the Concept. Mathematical Economics, 9, (16):22–28.
  13. Duff A, (2012), Finding the balance of power in a post-national democracy. Mathematical Social Sciences, 63. doi: 10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2011.11.007.
  14. Farrell D, Scully R, (2007), Representing Europe ́s Citizens? Electoral Institutions and the Failure of Parliamentary Representation. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  15. Grilli di Cortona P, Manzi C, Pennisi A, Ricca F, Simeone B, (1999), Evaluation and Optimization of Electoral Systems. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics. ISBN 9780898719819. doi: 10.1137/1.9780898719819.
  16. Grimmett G, (2011), The Allocation Between the EU Member States of the Seats in the European Parliament – Cambridge Compromise. Note. European Parliament, Directorate-General for Internal Policies, Policy Department C: Citizen’s Rights and Constitutional Affairs.
  17. Grimmett G, (2012), European apportionment via the Cambridge Compromise. Mathematical Social Sciences, 63, (2):68–73. doi: 10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2011.10.003.
  18. Grimmett G, Oelbermann KF, Pukelsheim F, (2012), A powerweighted variant of the EU27 Cambridge Copromise. Mathematical Social Sciences, 63, (2):136–140. doi: 10.1016/j. mathsocsci.2011.11.001.s.
  19. Haman J, (2017), The Concept of Degressive and Progressive Proportionality and its Normative and Descriptive Applications. Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric, 50, (63):67–91. doi: 10.1515/slgr-2017-0019.
  20. Laslier JF, (2012), Introduction to the Special Issue ‘Around the Cambridge Compromise: Apportionment in theory and practice’. Mathematical Social Sciences, 63. doi: 10.1016/j. mathsocsci.2012.01.007.
  21. Loosemore J, Hanby V, (1971), The Theoretical Limits of maximum Distortion: Some Analytical Expressions for Electoral Systems. British Journal of Political Science, 1, (4):467–477. doi: 10.1017/S000712340000925X.
  22. Martínez Aroza J, Ramírez González V, (2010), Comparative Analysis of Several Methods for Determining the Composition of the European Parliament. In: Cichocki M, Życzkowski K, (eds.) Institutional Design and Voting Power in the European Union. AshgateLondon„ pp. 255–268.
  23. McKee S, (2007), Malapportionment. In: Sabato L, Ernst H, (eds.) Encyclopedia of American Political Parties and Elections. Chcemark BooksNew York„ updated edition, pp. 214. Misztal A, (2011), Adjustment Function as a Tool for Distribution of Seats in the European Parliament. Mathematical Economics, 7:14 138–154.
  24. Moberg A, (2012), EP seats: The politics behind math. Mathematical Social Sciences, 63, (2):78–84. doi: 10.1016/j. mathsocsci.2011.10.011.
  25. Pitkin H, (1967), The Concept of Representation. University of California Press, Berkeley.
  26. Pukelsheim F, (2010), Putting Citizens First: Representation and Power in the European Union. In: Cichocki M, Życzkowski K, (eds.) Institutional Design and Voting Power in the European Union. AshgateLondon„ pp. 235–254.
  27. Pukelsheim F, (2014), Proportional Representation: Apportionment Methods and Their Applications. Springer, Heidelberg.
  28. Pukelsheim F, (2018), Compositional Proportionality among European Political Parties at European Parliament Elections. Středoevropské politické studie/Central European Political Science Review, 20, (1):1–15.
  29. Pukelsheim F, Grimmett G, (2017), Linking the Permanent System of the Distribution of Seats in the European Parliament with the Double-Majority Voting in the Council of Ministers. In: The Composition of the European Parliament. Workshop 30/I/2017. European Parliament, Directorate-General for Internal Policies, Policy Department C: Citizen’s Rights and Constitutional Affairs, PE 583.117, pp. 5–22.
  30. Pukelsheim F, Grimmett G, (2018), Degressive Representation of Member States in the European Parliament 2019–24. Representation, 54. doi: 10.1080/00344893.2018.1475417.
  31. Ramírez González V, (2010), Degressive Proportionality: Composition of the European Parliament. The Parabolic Method. In: Cichocki M, Życzkowski K, (eds.) Institutional Design and Voting Power in the European Union. AshgateLondon„ pp. 215–234.
  32. Ramírez-González V, (2012), Seat distribution in the European Parliament according to the Treaty of Lisbon. Mathematical Social Sciences, 63, (2):130–135. ISSN 0165-4896. doi: 10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2011.11.005.
  33. Ramírez González V, González V, Palomarez A, Márquez M, (2017), The r-DP Methods to Allocate the EP Seats to Member States. In: The Composition of the European Parliament. Workshop 30/I/2017. European Parliament, Directorate-General for Internal Policies, Policy Department C: Citizen’s Rights and Constitutional Affairs. In: Simeone B, Pukelsheim F, (eds.) Mathematics and Democracy: Recent Advances in Voting Systems and Collective Choice. SpringerBerlin Heidelberg„ pp. 23–36.
  34. Rittberger B, (2005), Building Europe's Parliament: Democratic Representation Beyond the Nation State. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  35. Rittberger B, (2009), The historical origins of the EU ìs system of representation. Journal of European Public Policy, 16, (1):43–61. doi: 10.1080/13501760802453114.
  36. Rodden J, (2002), Strength in Numbers? Representation and Redistribution in the European Union. European Union Politics, 3, (2):151–175. doi: 10.1177/1465116502003002002.
  37. Rose R, (2013), Representing Europeans: A Pragmatic Approach. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  38. Rose R, Bernhagen P, Borz G, (2012), Evaluating competing criteria for allocating parliamentary seats. Mathematical Social Sciences, 63, (2):85–89. doi: 10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2011.10. 005.
  39. Samuels D, Snyder R, (2001), The Value of a Vote: Malapportionment in Comparative Perspective. British Journal of Political Science, 31, (4):651–677. doi: 10.1017/S0007123401000254.
  40. Short J, (1993), An introduction to political geography. Routledge, London, second edition.
  41. Shugart M, Taagepera R, (2017), Votes from Seats: Logical Models of Electoral Systems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  42. Spierenburg D, Poidevin R, (1994), The History of the High Authority of the European Coal and Steel Community: Supranationality in Operation. Weidenfeld Nicolson, London.
  43. Taagepera R, (2007), Predicting Party Sizes: The Logic of Simple Electoral Systems. Oxford University Press, Oxford. Taagepera R, Laakso M, (1980), Proportionality Profiles of West European Electoral Systems. European Journal of Political Research, 8, (4):423–46. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.1980. tb00582.x.
  44. Taylor P, Johnston R, (1979), Geography of elections. Harmondsworth, London.
  45. Thomassen J, (1994), Empirical research into political representation: failing democracy or failing models? In: Jennings M, Mann T, (eds.) Elections at Home and Abroad: Essays in Honor of Warren E. Miller. Michigan University Press, Ann Arbor, pp. 237–264.
  46. Trzaskowski R, Popielawska J, (2013), How European are the European Elections? The European Pariament ìs Long Struggle for a Direct and Universal Suffrage Conducted According to a Uniform Electoral Procedure. In: Kużelewska E, Kloza D, (eds.) Elections to the European Parliament as a Challenge for Democracy. Oficyna Wydawicza ASPRA-JPWarszawa, Białystok„ pp. 27–42.
  47. Viola D, (2016), The genesis of the European Parliament: From appointed Consultative Assembly to directly elected legislative body. In: Viola D, (ed.) Routledge Handbook of European Elections. RoutledgeLondon„ pp. 3–16.
Language: English
Page range: 39 - 49
Submitted on: Jul 15, 2025
Accepted on: Mar 29, 2026
Published on: Jun 26, 2026
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2026 Jakub Charvát, published by Jan Evangelista Purkyně University in Ústí nad Labem
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.