Have a personal or library account? Click to login
What is the current state of geoparticipation in Czech municipalities? Cover

What is the current state of geoparticipation in Czech municipalities?

Open Access
|Jul 2021

References

  1. Agentura pro socialní začleňování (2021) Index sociálního vyloučení. Available at:
  2. Arnstein S (1969) A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Planning Association 35(4): 216–224.10.1080/01944366908977225
  3. Bernard J, Šimon M (2017) Inner peripheries in the Czech Republic: The multidimensional nature of social exclusion in rural areas. Czech Sociological Review 53(1): 3–28.10.13060/00380288.2017.53.1.299
  4. Chambers R (1994) The origins and practice of participatory rural appraisal. World Development 22(7): 953–969.10.1016/0305-750X(94)90141-4
  5. Dahl RA, Tufte ER (1973) Size and democracy (Vol. 2). Stanford University Press, Stanford.
  6. Dalton RJ (2017) The participation gap: Social status and political inequality. Oxford University Press, Oxford.10.1093/oso/9780198733607.001.0001
  7. Demerath N (1947) Ecology, framework for city planning. Social Forces 26(1): 62–67.10.2307/2572606
  8. Elstub S, Escobar O (2019 eds.) Handbook of democratic innovation and governance. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham.10.4337/9781786433862
  9. Fung A (2006) Varieties of participation in complex governance. Public Administration Review 66(s1): 66–75.10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00667.x
  10. Geissel B, Newton K (2012) Evaluating Democratic Innovations. Curing the democratic malaise? Routledge, London.10.4324/9780203155196
  11. Gnat M, Leszek K, Olszewski R (2016) The use of geoinformation technology, augmented reality and gamification in the urban modeling process. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) 9787: 484–496.10.1007/978-3-319-42108-7_37
  12. Gomes W (2008) Internet e participação política em sociedades democráticas. Revista FAMECOS 12(27): 58.10.15448/1980-3729.2005.27.3323
  13. Gomes W (2011) A democracia digital e o problema da participação civil na decisão política. Fronteiras - Estudos Midiáticos 7(3): 214–222.
  14. Guldi J (2017) A History of the participatory map. Public Culture 29(1 81): 79–112.10.1215/08992363-3644409
  15. Hurlbert M, Gupta J (2015) The split ladder of participation: A diagnostic, strategic, and evaluation tool to assess when participation is necessary. Environmental Science and Policy 50: 100–113.10.1016/j.envsci.2015.01.011
  16. Hurtíková H, Soukop M (2019) Participative and deliberative democracy on the local level: How the political characteristics of municipalities in the Czech Republic relate to the use of selected democratic innovation within their territory? Lex Localis 17(2): 369–393.10.4335/17.2.369-393(2019)
  17. Inglehart R (1971) The Silent Revolution in Europe: Intergenerational Change in Post-Industrial Societies. American Political Science Review 65(4): 991–1017.10.2307/1953494
  18. International Association of Public Participation (2018) IAP2 Spectrum of Public Participation. Available at:
  19. Jacobs J (1961) The death and life of American cities. Random House, New York.
  20. Kar B, Sieber R, Haklay M, Ghose R (2016) Public Participation GIS and Participatory GIS in the Era of GeoWeb. Cartographic Journal 53(4): 296–299.10.1080/00087041.2016.1256963
  21. Lysek J (2016) Participatory Democracy and local representation: A Czech Case Study.
  22. Lysek J, Pánek J, Lebeda T (2020) Who are the voters and where are they? Using spatial statistics to analyse voting patterns in the parliamentary elections of the Czech Republic. Journal of Maps 17(1): 33–38.10.1080/17445647.2020.1819901
  23. Ministry of Regional Development (2021) Strategie regionálního rozvoje ČR 2021+.
  24. Olszewski R, Trojanowska H, Turek A, Kietlinska B (2017) Solving smart city revitalisation problems with geoparticipation process and fuzzy methods. In: ICNC-FSKD 2017 - 13th International Conference on Natural Computation, Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery, pp. 2497–2503.10.1109/FSKD.2017.8393168
  25. Olszewski R, Turek A (2018) Using Fuzzy Geoparticipation Methods to Optimize the Spatial Development Process in a Smart City. In: 2018 IEEE 4th International Conference on Collaboration and Internet Computing (CIC), pp. 430–437.10.1109/CIC.2018.00065
  26. Pánek J (2016) From mental maps to GeoParticipation. The Cartographic Journal 53(4): 300–307.10.1080/00087041.2016.1243862
  27. Pászto V, Burian J, Marek L, Voženílek V, Tuček P (2016) Membership of Czech municipalities to rural and urban areas: A fuzzy-based approach. Geografie-Sbornik CGS 121(1): 156–186.10.37040/geografie2016121010156
  28. Pateman C (1970) Participation and democratic theory. Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511720444
  29. Poplin A, Pereira GC, Rocha MCF (2013) The participatory cube: A framework for analysis of online participation platforms. Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography 199649: 395–414.10.1007/978-3-642-37533-0_23
  30. Putnam RD (2000) Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon and Schuster, New York.10.1145/358916.361990
  31. Rocha EM (1997) A Ladder of Empowerment. Journal of Planning Education and Research 17(1): 31–44.10.1177/0739456X9701700104
  32. Smith G (2009) Democratic innovations: Designing institutions for citizen participation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9780511609848
  33. Schlozman KL, Verba S, Brady HE (2013) The unheavenly chorus: Unequal political voice and the broken promise of American democracy. Princeton University Press, Princeton.10.23943/princeton/9780691154848.001.0001
  34. Taylor N (1998) Urban planning theory since 1945. Sage, London.10.4135/9781446218648
  35. Thoneick R (2021) Integrating online and onsite participation in urban planning: Assessment of a digital participation system. International Journal of E-Planning Research 10(1): 1–20.10.4018/IJEPR.2021010101
  36. Tulloch DL (2007) Many, many maps: Empowerment and online participatory mapping. First Monday 12(2).10.5210/fm.v12i2.1620
  37. Economic Opportunity Act, 20 Public Law 88 (1964) Available at:
  38. Voženílek V, Kaňok J (2011) Metody tématické kartografie: vizualizace prostorových jevů. Univerzita Palckého v Olomouci, Olomouc.
  39. Zhang S (2018) Public participation in the Geoweb era: Geosocial media use in local government. University of Waterloo, Waterloo.
  40. Zhang S (2019) Public participation in the Geoweb era: Defining a typology for geo-participation in local governments. Cities 85: 38–50.10.1016/j.cities.2018.12.004
Language: English
Page range: 90 - 103
Submitted on: Mar 14, 2021
Accepted on: Jun 10, 2021
Published on: Jul 3, 2021
Published by: Jan Evangelista Purkyně University in Ústí nad Labem
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2021 Jiří Pánek, Vít Pásztó, Jaroslav Burian, Jakub Bakule, Jakub Lysek, published by Jan Evangelista Purkyně University in Ústí nad Labem
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.