The Determination of Main Obstacles for the Developing of Highquality Documentation during EIA Process on Natura 2000 Sites
By: Zuzana Michalcová and Peter Baus
References
- Jalava K, Pasanen S, Saalasti M, Kuitunen M (2010) Quality of environmental impact assessment: Finish EISs and the opinions of EIA professionals. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisals 28: 1527.
- Morgan RK, Hart A, Freeman C, Coutts B, Colwill D, Hughes A (2012) Practitioners, professional cultures, and perceptions of impact assessment. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 32: 1124.
- Morrison-Saunders A., Annandale D., Cappelluti J. (2001): Practitioner perspective on what influences EIA quality. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal 19(4): 321-325.
- Morrison-Saunders A., Bailey J. (2003): Practitioner perspectives on the role of science in environmental impact assessment. Environmental Management 31: 683-695.
- Ortolano L., Sheperd A. (1995): Environmental impact assessment: challenges and opportunities. Impact Assessment 13: 3-30.
- Pavličková K, Kozová M, Chrenščová V, Petríková D, Pauditšová E, Moravčíková Z (2009a) Environmentálne plánovanie a manažment, Univerzita Komenského v Bratislave, Prírodovedecká fakulta, Učebnica, Bratislava.
- Pavličková K, Kozová M, Miklošovičová A, Žarnovičan H, Barančok P, Luciak M (2009b) Posudzovanie vplyvov na životné prostredie: Vysokoškolský učebný text [CD/ROM]. Univerzita Komenského, Bratislava.
- Pinho P, Maia R, Monterroso A (2007) The quality of Portuguese Environmental Impact Studies: The Case of Small Hydro Power Projects. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 25: 189-205.
- Pölönen I, Hokkanen P, Jalava K (2011) The effectiveness of the Finish EIA system -- What Works, what doesn´t, and what could be improved? Environmental Impact Assessment Review 31: 120-128.
- Samarakoon M, Rowan JS (2008) A critical review of environmental impact statements in Sri Lanka with particular reference to Ecological Impact Assessment. Journal of Environmental management 41: 441-460.
- Snell T, Cowell R (2006) Scoping in environmental impact assessment: balancing precaution and efficiency? Environmental Impact Assessment Review 26: 359-376.
- Toro J, Requena I, Zamorano M (2010) Environmental impact assessment in Colombia: Critical analysis and proposals for improvement. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 30: 247-260.
- Wegner A, Moore SA, Bailey J (2005) Consideration of biodiversity in environmental impact assessment in Western Australia: practitioner perceptions. Environmental Impact Assessment 25: 143-162.
- Wood C (2003) Environmental Impact Assessment -- A Comparative Review, second edition. Pearson Education Ltd. Edinburgh Gate.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/geosc-2014-0001 | Journal eISSN: 1802-1115
Language: English
Page range: 1 - 8
Submitted on: Nov 15, 2012
Accepted on: Jan 7, 2014
Published on: Jun 26, 2014
Published by: Jan Evangelista Purkyně University in Ústí nad Labem
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
Related subjects:
© 2014 Zuzana Michalcová, Peter Baus, published by Jan Evangelista Purkyně University in Ústí nad Labem
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.