Degradation of Milk Protein Fractions Due to Pseudomonas Spp. in the Dairy Industry

Kováčová, Mariana; Výrostková, Jana

doi:10.2478/fv-2025-0010

References

1. Dudriková, E., Záhumenská, J., Výrostková, J., 2022: Hygiena, technológia, kvalita a bezpečnosť mlieka a mliečnych výrobkov. 1. diel. Košice: Univerzita veterinárskeho lekárstva a farmácie v Košiciach, 138 p.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
2. Dhasmana, S., Das. S., Shrivastava, S., 2022: Potential nutraceuticals from the casein fraction of goat’s milk. J. Food Biochem., 46, 6, 13982. DOI: 10.1111/jfbc.13982.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
3. Gai, N., Uniacke-Lowe, T., O’Regan, J., Goulding, D. A., Kelly, A. L., 2023: Influence of β-casein genotype on physicochemical properties and functionality of bovine milk. J. Dairy Sci., 106, 8357-8367. DOI: 10.3168/jds.2023-23687.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
4. Sharma, N., Sharma, R., Rajput, Y. S., Mann, B., Singh, R., Gandhi, K., 2021: Separation methods for milk proteins on polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis: Critical analysis and options for better resolution. Int. Dairy J., 114, 104920. DOI: 10.1016/j.idairyj.2020.104920.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
5. Murtaza, M. A., 2022: Encyclopedia of Dairy Sciences, Third Edition. 36-44 p.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
6. Gellrich, K., Meyer, H. H. D., Wiedemann, S., 2014: Composition of major proteins in cow milk differing in mean protein concentration during the first 155 days of lactation and the influence of season as well as shortterm restricted feeding in early and mid-lactation. Czech J. Anim. Sci., 59, 3, 97-106. DOI: 10.17221/7289-CJAS.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
7. Colantuono, A., D’Incecco, P., Fortina, M. G., Rosi, V., Ricci, G., Pellegrino, L., 2020: Milk substrates influence proteolytic activity of Pseudomonas fluorescens strains. Food Control, 111, 107063. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2019.107063.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
8. Oliveira, G. B. D., Favarin, L., Luchese, R. H., Mcintosh, D., 2015: Psychrotrophic bacteria in milk: How much do we really know? J. Microbiol., 46, 2, 313-321. DOI: 10.1590/S1517-838246220130963.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
9. Narvhus, J. A., Bækkelund, O. N., Tidemann, E. M., Østlie, H. M, Abrahamsen, R. K., 2021: Isolates of Pseudomonas spp. from cold-stored raw milk show variation in proteolytic and lipolytic properties, Int. Dairy J., 123, 105049. DOI: 10.1016/j.idairyj.2021.105049.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
10. Gaucher, I., Tanguy, G., Fauquant, J., Jardin, J., Rousseau, F., Robert, B., Madec, M.N., & Gaucheron, F., 2011: Proteolysis of casein micelles by Pseudomonas fluorescens CNRZ 798 contributes to the destabilisation of UHT milk during its storage. Dairy Sci. Technol., 91, 413-429. DOI: 10.1007/s13594-011-0019-4.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
11. Galarza, U., Iturmendi, N., García, A., Fernández, T., Maté, J. I., 2022: Evolution of microbial and protein qualities of fractions of milk protein processed by microfiltration. LWT, 157, 113064. DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2021.113064.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
12. Chramostová, J., Hanuš, O., Klimešová, M., Němečková, I., Roubal, P., Kopecký, J., Jedelská, R., Nejeschlebová, L., 2016: Proteolysis in Raw Milk in Relation to Microbiological Indicators. Food Analysis, Food Quality and Nutrition. Czech J. Food Sci., 34, 4, 306-312. DOI: 10.17221/64/2016-CJFS.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
13. Sumon, S. M., Parvin, M. S., Ehsan, M. A., Islam, M. T., 2020: Dynamics of somatic cell count and intramammary infection in lactating dairy cows. J. Adv. Vet. Anim. Res., 25, 7, 314-319. DOI: 10.5455/javar.2020.g423.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
14. Nariadenie Európskeho Parlamentu A Rady (Es) Č. 853/2004 z 29. apríla v znení neskorších predpisov [online], 2004, [cit. 2024.01.03], from < https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/SK/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX-:02004R0853-20100715&from=LV >.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
15. STN EN ISO 707, 2011: Milk and milk products. Guidance on sampling.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
16. STN EN ISO 6887-5, 2020: Microbiology of the food chain. Preparation of test samples, initial suspension and decimal dilutions for microbiological examination. Part 5: Specific rules for the preparation of milk and milk products.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
17. ISO/TS 11059, 2009: Milk and milk products – Method for the enumeration of Pseudomonas spp.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
18. Scatamburlo, T. M., Yamazi, A.K., Cavicchioli, V. Q., Pieri, F. A., Nero, L.A., 2015: Spoilage potential of Pseudomonas species isolated from goat milk. J. Dairy Sci., 98, 759-764. DOI: 10.3168/jds.2014-8747.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
19. Narvhus, J., Bækkelund, O. N., Tidemann, E. M., Østlie, H. M., Abrahamsen, R. K., 2021: Isolates of Pseudomonas spp. from cold-stored raw milk show variation in proteolytic and lipolytic properties. Int. Dairy J., 123, 105049. DOI: 10.1016/j.idairyj.2021.105049.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
20. Spilker, T., Vandamme, T. C. P., Lipuma, J. J., 2004: PCR-based assay for differentiation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa from other Pseudomonas species recovered from cystic fibrosis patients. J. Clin. Microbiol., 42, 2074-2079. DOI: 10.1128/JCM.42.5.2074-2079.2004.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
21. Kováčová, M., Výrostková, J., Dudriková, E., Zigo, F., Semjon, B., Regecová, I., 2021: Assessment of Quality and Safety of Farm Level Produced Cheeses from Sheep and Goat Milk. Appl. Sci., 11, 3196. DOI: 10.3390/app11073196.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
22. Zagorchev, L., Dimitrova, M., Odjakova, M., Teofanova, D., Hristov, P., 2013: Electrophoretic characterization of Milk Proteins from Bulgarian Rhodopean Cattle. Bulg. J. of Agric. Sci., 19, 197-200.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
23. Laemmli, U. K., 1970: Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature, 227, 680-685. DOI: 10.1038/227680a0.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
24. Zagorchev, L. E., Dimitrova, M., Odjakova, M., Teofanova, D., Hristov, P., 2013: Electrophoretic characterization of Milk Proteins from Bulgarian Rhodopean Cattle. Bulg. J. Agric. Sci., 19, 197-200.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
25. Yelubaeva, M. Y., Buralkhiev, B. A., Serikbayeva, A. D., Narmuratova, M. H., Kenenbay, S. Y., 2017: Electrophoretic identification of casein in various types of milk. OnLine J. Biol. Sci., 17, 4, 348-352. DOI: 10.3844/ojbsci.2017.348.352
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
26. Niamsiri, N., Batt. C. A., 2009: Dairy Products. Encyclopedia of Microbiology. Third Edition, Academic Press: 34-44 p.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
27. Moradi, M., Omer, A. K., Razavi, R., Valipour, S., Guimarães, J. T., 2021: The relationship between milk somatic cell count and cheese production, quality and safety: A review. Int. Dairy J., 113, 104884. DOI: 10.1016/j.idairyj.2020.104884.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
28. Panthi, R. R., Jordan, K. N., Kelly, A. A., 2017: Selection and treatment of milk for cheesemaking. Mcsweeney, O.L.H. et al. Everett (Eds.), Cheese. 4th ed. San Diego, CA, USA: Academic Press, 23-50 p.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
29. Bombade, K., Kamboj, A., Alhussien, M. N., Mohanty, A. K., Dang, A. K., 2018: Diurnal variation of milk somatic and differential leukocyte counts of Murrah buffaloes as influenced by different milk fractions, seasons and parities. Biol. Rhythm Res., 49, 151-163. DOI: 10.1080/09291016.2017.1345472.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
30. Zhang, D., Li, S., Palmer, J., Teh, K. H., Leow, S., Flint, S., 2020: The relationship between numbers of Pseudomonas bacteria in milk used to manufacture UHT milk and the effect on product quality. Int. Dairy J., 105, 1-8. DOI: 10.1016/j. idairyj.2020.104687.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
31. Mu, Z., Du, M., Bai, P., 2009: Purification and properties of a heat-stable enzyme of Pseudomonas fluorescens Rm12 from raw milk. Eur. Food Res. Technol., 5, 725-734. DOI: 10.1007/s00217-008-0983-y.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
32. Meng, L., Zhang, Y., Liu, H., Zhao, S., Wang, J., Zheng, N., 2017: Characterization of Pseudomonas spp. and Associated Proteolytic Properties in Raw Milk Stored at Low Temperatures. Front. Microbiol., 8. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.02158.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
33. Paludetti, L. F., O’Callaghan, T.F., Sheehan, J. J., Glee-son, D., Kelly, A. L., 2020: Effect of Pseudomonas fluorescens proteases on the quality of Cheddar cheese. J. Dairy Sci., 103, 7865-7878. DOI: 10.3168/jds.2019-18043.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
34. Xia, X., Tobin, J. T., Subhir, S., Fenelon, M. A., McSweeney, P. L. H., Sheehan, J. J., 2021: Effect of thermal treatment on serum protein reduced micellar casein concentrate: An evaluation of rennet coagulability, cheese composition and yield. Int. Dairy J., 114, 104902. DOI: 10.1016/j.idairyj.2020.104902.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
35. Lamichhane, P., Sharma, P., Kennedy, D., Kelly, A. L., Sheehan, J. J., 2019: Microstructure and fracture properties of semi-hard cheese: Differentiating the effects of primary proteolysis and calcium solubilization. Food Res. Int., 125, 108525. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2019.108525.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
36. Agregán, R., Echegaray, N., López-Pedrouso, M., Kharabsheh, R., Franco, D., Lorenz,o J. M., 2021: Proteomic Advances in Milk and Dairy Products. Molecules, 23, 13, 3832. DOI: 10.3390/molecules26133832.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article

Degradation of Milk Protein Fractions Due to Pseudomonas Spp. in the Dairy Industry

References

Paradigm

My account