Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Extracellular activity of proteases from Yarrowia lipolytica IPS21 as a function of the carbon and nitrogen source Cover

Extracellular activity of proteases from Yarrowia lipolytica IPS21 as a function of the carbon and nitrogen source

Open Access
|Dec 2023

Figures & Tables

Table 1.

Influence of the carbon source on the biomass and yeast Y. lipolytica IPS21 protein concentration. Values for single elements are not significantly different (P < 0.05) according to Tukey’s Kramer test for multiple comparison of the biomass or total protein marked with the same letter

Carbon sourceBiomass production, g g-1 of carbohydrate substrateTotal protein, μg mL-1
Yeast extract0.385 ± 0.02d120 ± 5.20a
Glucose0.452 ± 0.11aa124 ± 4.73a
Glycerol0.465 ± 0.03aa120 ± 6.55a
Starch0.401 ± 0.02d114 ± 4.66a
Semolina wheat0.225 ± 0.09a111 ± 7.22a
Oat0.317 ± 0.12b109 ± 1.99a
Saccharose0.364 ± 0.09c130 ± 2.33a
Pectin0.299 ± 0.16b128 ± 2.98a
Straw0.364 ± 0.04c112 ± 7.66a
Saccharose + CTLS*0.354 ± 0.04c124 ± 8.13a
Starch + CTLS0.320 ± 0.08b120 ± 5.78a
CTLS0.204 ± 0.09a110 ± 2.59a

1* CTLS -chrome-tanned leather shavings

Fig. 1.

*CTLS - chrome-tanned leather shavings

Influence of the carbon source on the activity of the proteases of the yeast Y. lipolytica IPS21. Values for single elements are not significantly different (P < 0.05) according to Tukey’s Kramer test for multiple comparisons of supernatants marked with the same letter

Fig. 2.

*CTLS -chrome-tanned leather shavings

Influence of the carbon source on the pH of the medium during the biological process with the yeast Y. lipolytica IPS21. Values for single elements are not significantly different (P < 0.05) according to Tukey’s Kramer test for multiple comparisons of the medium marked with the same letter

Table 2.

Composition of amino acids in the supernatant after 48 hours of biological treatment with Y. lipolytica IPS21

Name of acidYeast extract medium with YarrowiaCTLS medium with YarrowiaYeast extract medium without YarrowiaCTLS medium without Yarrowia
g 100 g-1 of supernatant
Aspartic acid0.030.220.070.13
Threonine<0.020.050.070.04
Serine<0.020.10<0.020.06
Glutamic acid0.090.290.090.26
Proline<0.020.330.030.25
Glycine<0.020.550.020.37
Alanine<0.020.210.060.20
Valine<0.020.050.050.06
Methionine<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.02
Isoleucine<0.020.190.030.05
Leucine<0.020.080.060.08
Tyrosine<0.020.030.030.03
Phenylalanine<0.020.070.040.05
Ornithine<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.02
Gamma-Aminobutyric acid<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.02
Lysine<0.020.090.050.12
Histidine<0.020.03<0.04<0.02
Arginine<0.020.170.030.11
Taurine, 2-aminoethanesulfonic acid<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.02
Hydroxyproline<0.020.30<0.020.17
Cysteine<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.02
Hydroxylysine<0.020.04<0.02<0.02
Sum of amino acid content (mean value)0.122.780.631.98
Table 3.

Influence of the amount of yeast extract in the medium with 0.6 g of CTLS on the biomass and protein concentration of the yeast Y. lipolytica IPS21. Values for single elements are not significantly different (P<0.05) according to Tukey’s Kramer test for multiple comparisons of biomass or the total protein marked with the same letter

Carbon sourcesBiomass production, g g-1 of carbohydrate substrateTotal protein, μg mL-1
0.6 g yeast extract0.205 ± 0.14a112.4 ± 6.55c
0.4 g yeast extract0.375 ± 0.16c89.2 ± 4.22b
0.2 g yeast extract0.316 ± 0.09b64.2 ± 4.33a
Fig. 3.

*YE – yeast extract

Influence of the amount of yeast extract in a medium with 0.6 g of CTLS on the activity of proteases of Y. lipolytica IPS21 yeast. Values for single elements are not significantly different (P < 0.05) according to Tukey’s Kramer test for multiple comparisons

Table 4.

Metal concentrations in selected samples of biomass with Y. lipolytica IPS21 yeast or a supernatant after the process of protease production in a medium with 0.6 g of CTLS and different amounts of yeast extract. Values for single elements are not significantly different (P<0.05) according to Tukey’s Kramer test for multiple comparisons of the biomass or supernatant marked with the same letter

Metal
Variant
CaCrFeKMgNaPS
g kg-1
0.2 g YE3.16 ±3.68 ±0.55 ±5.16 ±2.44 ±15.44 ±16.02 ±3.36 ±
biomass0.21a0.30a0.02a0.55a0.13a1.22a1.45a1.24a
0.4 g YE1.92 ±3.33 ±0.51 ±4.06 ±2.12 ±9.81 ±19.89 ±5.15 ±
biomass0.11b0.22a0.02a0.45b0.18b1.18b2.66b0.12b
0.2 g YE0.10 ±0.54 ±0.09 ±0.25 ±0.05 ±3.0 ±0.09 ±0.52 ±
supernatant0.01a0.01a0.01a0.08a0.32a0.54a0.02a0.13a
0.4 YE0.10 ±0.53 ±0.10 ±0.26 ±0.06 ±3.3 ±0.08 ±0.57 ±
supernatant0.01a0.02a0.04a0.02a0.01a0.03a0.01a0.03a
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ftee-2023-0046 | Journal eISSN: 2300-7354 | Journal ISSN: 1230-3666
Language: English
Page range: 66 - 74
Published on: Dec 1, 2023
Published by: Łukasiewicz Research Network-Łódź Institute of Technology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: Volume open

© 2023 Dorota Wieczorek, Katarzyna Miśkiewicz, Dorota Gendaszewska, Paulina Pipiak, Magdalena Lasoń-Rydel, Katarzyna Sieczyńska, Katarzyna Ławińska, published by Łukasiewicz Research Network-Łódź Institute of Technology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.