Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Herbal Extract-Induced Silver Nanoparticles For Antibacterial Cotton Fabric Cover

Herbal Extract-Induced Silver Nanoparticles For Antibacterial Cotton Fabric

Open Access
|Sep 2023

Figures & Tables

Fig. 1.

AgNPs size measurement
AgNPs size measurement

Fig. 2.

UV-Visible spectral analysis of nanosolution
UV-Visible spectral analysis of nanosolution

Fig. 3.

FTIR analysis of Ag-NPs solution
FTIR analysis of Ag-NPs solution

Fig. 4.

SEM analysis of silver nano particles
SEM analysis of silver nano particles

Fig. 5.

EDX Analysis of nano particles on aluminum foil
EDX Analysis of nano particles on aluminum foil

Fig. 6.

Crystalline behavior of Ag NPs
Crystalline behavior of Ag NPs

Fig. 7.

E. coli bacterial reduction % without washing and after 10 washes
E. coli bacterial reduction % without washing and after 10 washes

Fig. 8.

Role of chitosan in AgNPs adhesion on cotton fabric surface
Role of chitosan in AgNPs adhesion on cotton fabric surface

Fig. 9.

S. aureus bacterial reduction % without washing and after 10 washes
S. aureus bacterial reduction % without washing and after 10 washes

Variation in crystalline size, lattice parameter, and cell volume of biosynthesized NPs

‘2θ’ of Intense peakPlane (h, k, l)Crystalline size (D) nmLattice constant (Å)Cell volume (Å3)
38.1211111.424.1068.57
44.262006.824.1069.42
64.4222010.654.1068.92
77.3931110.534.1068.76

Antibacterial efficiency of treated samples

S. No.Sample CodeSamplesBacterial reduction in % (E. coli)Antibacterial efficiency after 10th laundryBacterial reduction in % (S. aureus)Antibacterial efficiency after 10th laundry in %
1.S1Blank sample/untreated fabric-Nil--Nil --Nil--Nil -
2.S2Sample treated only with AgNPs-100 ppm67.0%38.5%64.235.0
3.S3Sample treated only with AgNPs-200 ppm76.2%42.3%72.438.2
4.S4Sample treated only with AgNPs-300 ppm84.0%45.2%79.642.6
5.S5Sample treated with-[chitosan 0.5% + AgNPs-100 ppm]82.5%71.2%78.070.8
6.S6Sample treated with-[chitosan 0.5% + AgNPs-200 ppm]87.2%76.5%81.375.4
7.S7Sample treated with-[chitosan 0.5% + AgNPs-300 ppm]93.2%82.4%87.081.3
8.S8Sample treated with-[chitosan 1% + AgNPs-100 ppm]91.8%80.1%88.180.0
9.S9Sample treated with-[chitosan 1%+ AgNPs-200 ppm]94.6%84.2%91.283.7
10.S10Sample treated with-[chitosan 1% + AgNPs-300 ppm]97.8%90.6%94.889.5

Composition of the sample shown by EDX analysis

eZAF Smart Quant Results
ElementWeight %Atomic %Net Int.Error %K ratioZAF
AlK36.4669.64762.374.120.21840.71750.83021.0054
AgL63.5430.36419.263.710.37530.55381.06720.9995
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ftee-2023-0024 | Journal eISSN: 2300-7354 | Journal ISSN: 1230-3666
Language: English
Page range: 22 - 29
Published on: Sep 1, 2023
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: Volume open

© 2023 Sanjeev Kumar Rajput, Mukesh Kumar Singh, Dinesh Babu Shakyawar, published by Łukasiewicz Research Network, Institute of Biopolymers and Chemical Fibres
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.