References
- Council Directive (EU) 2019/904 of 5 June 2019 on the reduction of the impact of certain plastic products on the environment. Available from: https://eurlex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2019/904/oj.
- PlasticEurope. Plastic – the facts 2020. An analysis of European plastics production, demand and waste data, [Internet]; 2020 [cited 2022 Feb]; Available from: https://plasticseurope.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/Plastics_the_facts-WEB-2020_versionJun21_final.pdf
- Alavi S, Thomas S, Sandeep KP, Kalarikkal N, Varghese J, Yaragalla S. Polymers for Packaging Applications. USA: CRC Press; 2014.
- Ivonkovic A, Zeljko K, Talic S, Lasic M. Biodegradable Packaging in the Food Industry. J. Food Saf. Food Qual. 2017; 68(2): 26–38.
- Moustafa H, Darwish NA, Nour MA, Youssef AM. Biodegradable Date Stones Filler for Enhancing Mechanical, Dynamic, and Flame Retardant Properties of Polyamide-6 Biocomposites. Polym. Compos. 2018; 39(6): 1978–1987.
- Moustafa H, Youssef AM, Darwish NA, Abou-Kandil AI. Eco-Friendly Polymer Composites for Green Packaging: Future Vision And Challenges. Compos B Eng. 2019; 172: 16.
- Draskovic N. Packaging Convenience: Consumer Packaging Feature or Marketing Tool. IJMC 2010; 12(2): 267–274.
- Galil BS, Genovesi P, Ojaveer H, Quílez-Badia G, Occhipinti A. Mislabeled: Eco-Labeling an Invasive Alien Shellfish Fishery. Biol. Invasions 2013; 15(11): 2363–2365.
- D'Souza C, Taghian M, Lamb P. An Empirical Study on the Influence of Environmental Labels on Consumers. CCIJ 2006; 11(2): 162–173.
- Van Amstel M, Driessen P, Glasbergen P. Eco-Labeling And Information Asymmetry: A Comparison of Five Eco-Labels in the Netherlands. J. Clean. Prod. 2008; 16(3): 263–276.
- Campbell-Johnston K, de Munck M, Vermeulen WJ, Backes C. Future Perspectives on the Role of Extended Producer Responsibility within a Circular Economy: A Delphi Study Using the Case of the Netherlands. Bus Strategy Environ. 2021; 30(8): 4054–4067.
- Katowice City Hall, Department of Environmental Design, Eco-labels - it's worth getting to know them (in Polish) [Internet], Katowice (POL): Urząd Miasta Katowice, [cited 2022 Feb], Available from: https://odpady.katowice.eu/ekoznaki-warto-je-poznac/.
- Brécard D. Consumer Confusion Over the Profusion of Eco-Labels: Lessons from a Double Differentiation Model. Resour Energy Econ 2014; 37: 64–84.
- Thøgersen J, Haugaard P, Olesen A. Consumer Responses to Ecolabels. Eur J Mark. 2010; 44: 1787–1810.
- Moon SJ, Costello JP, Koo DM. The Impact of Consumer Confusion from Eco-Labels on Negative WOM, Distrust, and Dissatisfaction. Int J Advert 2017; 36(2): 246–271.
- Harbaugh R, Maxwell J-W, Roussillon B. Label Confusion: The Groucho Effect of Uncertain Standards. Manage Sci 2011; 57(9): 1512–1527.
- Carlsson F, García JH, Löfgren Å. Conformity and the Demand for Environmental Goods. Environ Resour Econ 2010; 47(3): 407–421.
- Maniatis P. Investigating Factors Influencing Consumer Decision-Making while Choosing Green Products. J Clean Prod 2016; 132: 215–228.
- Georgakarakou C, Riskos K, Tsourvakas G, Yfantidou I. What Features of Green Products Packaging are More Eye Catching? An Eye-Tracking Exploratory Study about Organic Agricultural Products. Int. J. Technol. Mark. 2020; 14: 93–124.
- Taufique KR, Siwar C, Chamhuri N. Factors Affecting Consumers' Perception of Eco-Labels: Evidence from Malaysia. In Proceedings of the Australia-Middle East Conference on Business and Social Sciences 2016, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
- Crespi JM, Marette S. Eco-Labelling Economics: Is Public Involvement Necessary. Environment, information and consumer behawior 2005; 93–110.
- Lindh H, Olsson A, Williams H. Consumer Perceptions of Food Packaging: Contributing to or Counteracting Environmentally Sustainable Development? Packag. Technol. Sci. 2016; 29: 3–23.
- Lindh H, Williams H, Olsson A, Wikström F. Elucidating the Indirect Contributions of Packaging to Sustainable Development: A Terminology of Packaging Functions and Features. Packag. Technol. Sci. 2016; 29: 225–246.
- Nordin N, Selke S. Social Aspect of Sustainable Packaging. Packag. Technol. Sci. 2010; 23: 317–326.
- Steenis ND, van Herpen E, van der Lans IA, Ligthart TN, van Trijp HCM. Consumer Response to Packaging Design: The Role of Packaging Materials and Graphics in Sustainability Perceptions and Product Evaluations. J. Clean. Prod. 2017; 162: 286–298.
- Wei S, Ang T, Jancenelle VE. Willingness to Pay More for Green Products: The Interplay of Consumer Characteristics and Customer Participation. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2018; 45: 230–238.
- Biswas A, Roy M. A Study of Consumers' Willingness to Pay for Green Products. JOAMS 2016; 4(3): 211–214.
- Moon W, Florkowski W, Bruckner B, Schonhof I. Willingness to Pay for Environmental Practices: Implications for Eco-Labeling. Land Econ. 2002; 75(1): 88–102.
- Gerrard C, Janssen M, Smith L, Hamm U, Padel S. UK Consumer Reactions to Green Certification Logos. Br Food J. 2013; 115(5): 727 – 742.
- Mobile Institute. Green generation 2021. Together for the land, report (in Polish), [Internet]; 2021 [cited 2022 Feb]; Available from: https://s.mobileinstitute.eu/pub/429be3e5cbfd899f894d5d-86b453e6eca92750d9/GreenGeneration_WspolnieNaRzeczZiemi_2021.pdf
- SW Research. Ecobarometer. On the road to a green society (in Polish), [Internet]; 2021 [cited 2022 Feb]; Available from: https://swresearch.pl/raporty/ekobarometr-pelna-wersja-raportu-ztrzeciego-pomiaru
- Kantar. Earthlings design, supplement to report Earthlings attack. (in Polish), [Internet]; 2020 [cited 2022 Feb]; Available at: https://ziemianieatakuja.pl/
- The Eco Gender Gap: 71% of Women try to live more ethically, compared to 59% of men. Mintel July 27th, 2018. Available from: https://www.mintel.com/press-centre/social-and-lifestyle/the-eco-gender-gap-71-of-women-try-to-live-more-ethically-compared-to-59-of-men
- Swim JK, Gillis AJ, Hamaty KJ. Gender Bending and Gender Conformity : The Social Consequences of Engaging in Feminine and Masculine Pro-Environmental Behaviors. Sex Roles. 2020; 82(5–6): 363–385.
- Hunter LM, Hatch A, Johnson A. Cross-National Gender Variation In Environmental Behaviourrs. Soc. Sci. Q. 2004; 85(3): 677–694.
- Dąbrowski A. The Economics of Responsibility. A culture of (In) responsibility. (in Polish). Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN; 2021.
- European Commission. Eco-labels, success stories, Olaf Tschimpke, President of NABU – The Nature and Biodiversity Conservation Union. Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/environment/ecolabel/green-week-2.html
- Roberts JA, Bacon DR. Exploring the Subtle Relationships Between Environmental Concern and Ecologically Conscious Consumer Behavior. J. Bus. Res. 1997; 40:79–89.
- Taufique KMR, Vocino A, Polonsky MJ. The Influence of Eco-Label Knowledge and Trust on Pro-Environmental Consumer Behaviourr in an Emerging Market. J. Strateg. Mark. 2017; 25: 511–529.
- Cheung MF, To WM. An Extended Model of Value-Attitude-Behavior to Explain Chinese Consumers' Green Purchase Behavior. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2019; 50: 145–153.
- Vermeir I, Verbeke W. Sustainable Food Consumption Among Young Adults in Belgium: Theory of Planned Behaviourr and the Role of Confidence and Values. Ecol. Econ. 2008; 64: 542–553.
- Wu S-I, Chen J-Y. A Model of Green Consumption Behavior Constructed by the Theory of Planned Behavior. Int. J. Mark. Stud. 2014; 6: 119.
- Claudy MC, Peterson M, O'driscoll A. Understanding the Attitude-Behavior Gap for Renewable Energy Systems Using Behavioral Reasoning Theory. J. Macromark. 2013; 33: 273–287.
- Zhang Y, Bai X, Mills FP, Pezzey JCV. Examining the Attitude-Behavior Gap in Residential Energy Use: Empirical Evidence from A Large-Scale Survey In Beijing, China. J. Clean. Prod. 2021; 295:126510.
- Song Y, Qin Z, Yuan Q. The Impact of Eco-Label on the Young Chinese Generation: The Mediation Role of Environmental Awareness and Product Attributes in Green Purchase. Sustainability 2019; 11: 973.
- Iraldo F, Griesshammer R, Kahlenborn W. The Future of Ecolabels. Int J Life Cycle Assess 2020; 25:833–839.
- Brécard D. Consumer Misperception of Eco-Labels, Green Market Structure and Welfare. J Regul Econ. 2017; 51(3):340–364.