Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Assessment of tree damage following the first entry of shelterwood cutting in the Carpathian region Cover

Assessment of tree damage following the first entry of shelterwood cutting in the Carpathian region

By: Andrii Malon and  Vasyl Olijnyk  
Open Access
|Mar 2026

Figures & Tables

Figure 1.

Damaged roots (photo: A. Malon).

Figure 2.

Damaged trunk and root collar (photo: A. Malon).

Figure 3.

Outer bark layer damaged (photo: A. Malon).

Figure 4.

Exposed but undamaged wood (photo: A. Malon). Note: Time of documented damage – June 2025; time of logging activity – March 2023 and October 2024.

Figure 5.

Damaged wood (photo: A. Malon). Malon).

Figure 6.

Relationship between the location of wood damage and the volume of felled and transported timber.

Figure 7.

Relationship between the distance of damaged wood and the volume of felled and transported timber.

Figure 8.

Relationship between the degree of wood damage and the volume of felled and transported timber.

Figure 9.

Relationship between wood wound size and the volume of felled and transported timber.

Overview of damage results in the studied plots_

No. of the research plot1234567891011Average valueStandard Deviation/Standard Error
Number of appraised trees, pcsin the area150231320278351254410389154279201274.2787.84/26.50
per 1ha187.5256.7320.0278.0390.0362.9410.0389.0256.7279.0335.0314.9869.69/21.02
Number of damaged trees, pcsin the area163526243526323521141625.457.97/2.40
per 1ha20.038.926.024.038.937.132.035.035.014.026.729.788.25/2.49
Damage intensity, %10.6715.158.138.639.9710.247.809.0013.645.027.969.282.81/0.85

Proportion of damaged trees depending on the location and severity of damage_

No. of the research plot1234567891011Average valueStandard deviation/standard error
Location of damage
Trunk and root collar75.071.580.875.068.671.465.680.071.478.674.974.754.83/1.46
Roots25.028.519.225.031.428.634.420.028.621.425.125.254.83/1.46
Degree of damage
The outer layer of bark is damaged3.819.012.525.017.17.76.337.522.928.628.619.0011.37/3.43
Complete destruction of the bark without damage to the wood34.657.143.841.740.023.137.543.851.457.142.943.0010.57/3.19
The wood is damaged61.523.843.833.342.969.256.318.825.714.328.638.0017.06/5.14
The distribution share of damage by wound size
up to 10 cm215.447.618.829.222.911.515.637.534.342.940.028.7012.60/3.80
11 to 100 cm230.838.137.550.037.138.537.556.351.442.951.442.858.75/2.64
more than 100 cm253.814.343.820.840.050.046.96.314.314.38.628.4517.90/5.40
Proportion of damaged trees depending on the distance from the skid trail
up to 1 m57.723.862.522.945.776.946.912.433.228.622.939.4020.23/5.84
1 to 5 m23.171.425.157.122.919.221.962.433.236.042.937.7518.98/5.48
more than 5 m19.24.812.420.131.43.931.324.733.236.034.322.8511.56/3.34

Characteristics of the research object_

No. of the research plotLocationArea, haYear of fellingHarvestable volume, m3
Forestry districtForest rangeForest compartmentForest subcompartmenttotalper ha
1VygodaShevchenkivske1533.40.82023174217.5
2VygodaShevchenkivske1533.50.920238695.6
3VygodaShevchenkivske2614.01.02023190190.0
4VygodaSlobidske1013.21.02023110110.0
5VygodaSlobidske2312.10.92023111123.3
6BroshnivskeLypovetske4023.20.72023178254.3
7VygodaSlobidske2327.41.02024131131.0
8BroshnivskeLuhivske41.01.020247070.0
9OsmolodskePerehinske251.00.6202466110.0
10OsmolodskePerehinske176.21.020244848.0
11OsmolodskePerehinske2314.40.6202463105.0
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/fsmu-2025-0004 | Journal eISSN: 1736-8723 | Journal ISSN: 1406-9954
Language: English
Page range: 40 - 50
Submitted on: May 30, 2025
Accepted on: Jan 28, 2026
Published on: Mar 23, 2026
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2026 Andrii Malon, Vasyl Olijnyk, published by Estonian University of Life Sciences
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.