Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Puistu ruumilise struktuuri arvutuslik kirjeldamine Cover

Puistu ruumilise struktuuri arvutuslik kirjeldamine

Open Access
|Feb 2023

References

  1. Arumäe, T., Lang, M. 2020. Airborne laser scanning as a basis for forest mensuration. – Forestry Studies / Metsanduslikud Uurimused, 73, 136–144.
  2. Buongiorno, J., Dahir, S., Lu, H.C., Lin, C.R. 1994. Tree size diversity and economic returns in uneven-aged forest stands. – Forest Science, 40, 83–103.
  3. Gadow, K.v. 1993. New variables for describing stands of trees. (Zur Bestandesbeschreibung in der Forsteinrichtung). – Forst und Holz, 48(21), 602–606. (In German).
  4. Gadow, K.v. 1999. Forest structure and diversity. (Waldstruktur und Diversität). – Allgemeine Forst- und Jagdzeitung, 170(7), 117–122. (In German).
  5. Gadow, K.v., Hui, G.Y. 2002. Characterising forest spatial structure and diversity. – Bjoerk, L. (ed.). Sustainable Forestry in Temperate Regions. Lund, Sweden, SUFOR, University of Lund, 20–30.
  6. Gadow, K.v., Zhang, C.Y., Wehenkel, C., Pommerening, A., Corral-Rivas, J., Korol, M., Myklush, S., Hui, G.Y., Kiviste, A., Zhao, X.H. 2012. Forest structure and diversity. – Pukkala, T., Gadow, K.v. (eds.). Continuous Cover Forestry. Managing Forest Ecosystems. Dordrecht, Springer Netherlands, 29–83.
  7. Hui, G.Y., Gadow, K.v. 2002. The optimum standard angle of the Winkelmass. (Das Winkelmass – Herleitung des optimalen Standardwinkels). – Allgemeine Forst- und Jagdzeitung, 173(10), 173–177. (In German).
  8. Huuskonen, S., Domisch, T., Finér, L., Hantula, J., Hynynen, J., Matala, J., Miina, J., Neuvonen, S., Nevalainen, S., Niemistö, P., Nikula, A., Piri, T., Siitonen, J., Smolander, A., Tonteri, T., Uotila, K., Viiri, H. 2021. What is the potential for replacing monocultures with mixed-species stands to enhance ecosystem services in boreal forests in Fennoscandia? – Forest Ecology and Management, 479, 118558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118558.
  9. Juchheim, J. 2020. Quantifying the impact of forest management intensity and tree species diversity on individual tree shape and three-dimensional stand structure. – Doctoral dissertation. Göttingen, Georg-August-University of Göttingen. 125 pp.
  10. Kint, V., van Meirvenne, M., Nachtergale, L., Geudens, G., Lust, N. 2003. Spatial methods for quantifying forest stand structure development: a comparison between nearest-neighbor indices and variogram analysis. – Forest Science, 49(1), 36–49.
  11. Kiviste, A., Hordo, M., Kangur, A., Kardakov, A., Laarmann, D., Lilleleht, A., Metslaid, S., Sims, A., Korjus, H. 2015. Monitoring and modeling of forest ecosystems: the Estonian Network of Forest Research Plots. – Forestry Studies / Metsanduslikud Uurimused, 62, 26–38.
  12. Korjus, H., Laarmann, D., Kiviste, A. 2012. Analysis of the Estonian Forest Conservation Area Network. – Journal of Environmental Science and Engineering. B, 1(6B), 779–788.
  13. Laarmann, D., Korjus, H., Sims, A., Stanturf, J.A., Kiviste, A., Köster, K. 2009. Analysis of forest naturalness and tree mortality patterns in Estonia. – Forest Ecology and Management, 258S, S187–S195.
  14. Maa-amet. 2021. Altitude points for aerial laser scanning (ALS). Estonian Land Board, geoportal. [WWW document]. – URL https://geoportaal.maaamet.ee/est/Ruumiandmed/Korgusandmed/Aerolaserskaneerimise-korguspunktid-p499.html. [Accessed 21 October 2022].
  15. McElhinny, C., Gibbons, P., Brack, C., Bauhus, J. 2005. Forest and woodland stand structural complexity: its definition and measurement. – Forest Ecology and Management, 218(1–3), 1–24.
  16. Mikoláš, M., Svitok, M., Bollmann, K., Reif, J., Bače, R., Janda, P., Trotsiuk, V., Čada, V., Vítková, L., Teodosiu, M., Coppes, J., Schurman, J.S., Morrissey, R.C., Mrhalová, H., Svoboda, M. 2017. Mixed-severity natural disturbances promote the occurrence of an endangered umbrella species in primary forests. – Forest Ecology and Management, 405, 210–218.
  17. Pommerening, A., Särkkä, A. 2013. What mark variograms tell about spatial plant interactions. – Ecological Modelling, 251, 64–72.
  18. Pretzsch, H. 1995. On the effect of the spatial distribution of trees on the stand growth. (Zum Einfluss des Baumvertielungsmusters auf den Bestandszuwachs). – Allgemeine Forst- und Jagdzeitung, 166, 190–201. (In German).
  19. Põldveer, E. 2022. Quantitative assessment of stand structural traits and health condition in hemiboreal forest ecosystems. – Doctoral thesis. Tartu, Estonian University of Life Sciences. 106 pp. Available online: https://dspace.emu.ee/handle/10492/7248.
  20. Põldveer, E., Korjus, H., Kiviste, A., Kangur, A., Paluots, T., Laarmann, D. 2020. Assessment of spatial stand structure of hemiboreal conifer dominated forests according to different levels of naturalness. – Ecological Indicators, 110, 105944.
  21. Põldveer, E., Potapov, A., Korjus, H., Kiviste, A., Stanturf, J.A., Arumäe, T., Kangur, A., Laarmann, D. 2021. The structural complexity index SCI is useful for quantifying structural diversity of Estonian hemiboreal forests. – Forest Ecology and Management, 490(1–3), 119093.
  22. Reimand, S. 2019. Assessment of stand structural indices on forest permanent sample plots. – Bachelor’s thesis. Tartu, Estonian University of Life Sciences. 39 pp. (In Estonian with English summary).
  23. Seidel, D., Ehbrecht, M., Annighöfer, P. Ammer, C. 2019. From tree to stand-level structural complexity – Which properties make a forest stand complex? – Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 278, 107699.
  24. Sirkas, F., Valgepea, M. 2022. Yearbook Forest 2020. (Aastaraamat Mets 2020). Tallinn, Estonian Environment Agency. 322 pp. [WWW document]. – URL https://keskkonnaportaal.ee/sites/default/files/Teemad/Mets/Mets2020.pdf. [Accessed 21 October 2022].
  25. Thompson, I., Mackey, B., McNulty, S., Mosseler, A. 2009. Forest resilience, biodiversity, and climate change. A synthesis of the biodiversity/resilience/stability relationship in forest ecosystems. Technical Series No. 43. Montreal, Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity. 67 pp.
  26. Thorn, S., Bässler, C., Svoboda, M., Müller, J. 2017. Effects of natural disturbances and salvage logging on biodiversity – Lessons from the Bohemian Forest. – Forest Ecology and Management, 388, 113–119.
  27. Zenner, E.K. 1998. A new index for describing the structural complexity of forests. – Doctoral dissertation. Corvallis, Oregon, Oregon State University. 177 pp.
  28. Zenner, E.K. 2000. Do residual trees increase structural complexity in Pacific Northwest coniferous forests? – Ecological Applications, 10(3), 800–810.
  29. Zenner, E.K., Hibbs, D.E. 2000. A new method for modeling the heterogeneity of forest structure. – Forest Ecology and Management, 129, 75–87.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/fsmu-2022-0006 | Journal eISSN: 1736-8723 | Journal ISSN: 1406-9954
Language: English
Page range: 90 - 98
Submitted on: May 28, 2022
Accepted on: Nov 11, 2022
Published on: Feb 20, 2023
Published by: Estonian University of Life Sciences
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2023 Eneli Põldveer, Diana Laarmann, Henn Korjus, published by Estonian University of Life Sciences
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.