Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Quercus cerris L.: An Overview Cover
Open Access
|Dec 2021

References

  1. Amorini, E., Biocca, M., Manetti, M.C., Motta, E. 1996. A dendroecological study in a declining oak coppice stand. – Annales des Sciences Forestières, 53(2–3), 731–742.
  2. Arborjet. 2020. Anthracnose. [WWW document]. – URL https://arborjet.com/problems_solutions/anthracnose/. [Accessed 9 February 2021].
  3. Bobinac, M., Andrašev, S., Šušić, N., Bauer-Živković, A., Kabiljo, M. 2019. Growth characteristics of three-year-old Turkey oak (Quercus cerris L.) seedlings from natural regeneration under a dense canopy stand. – Biologica Nyssana, 10(2), 105–111.
  4. Bozzano, M., Turok, J. 2003. Mediterranean Oaks Network. – Report of the second meeting of the Mediterranean Oaks Network, Malta, May 2002. Gozo, 28–31.
  5. Burlacu, E., Nisca, A., Tanase, C. 2020. A comprehensive review of phytochemistry and biological activities of Quercus species. – Forests, 11(9), 904. https://doi.org/10.3390/f11090904.
  6. CABI. 2021. Quercus cerris (European Turkey oak). [WWW document]. – URL https://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/46407. [Accessed 31 January 2021].
  7. Colangelo, M., Camarero, J.J., Borghetti, M., Gentilesca, T., Oliva, J., Redondo, M.A., Ripullone, F. 2018. Drought and Phytophthora are associated with the decline of oak species in southern Italy. – Frontiers in Plant Science, 9, 1595. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.01595.
  8. de Rigo, D., Enescu, C.M., Houston Durrant, T., Caudullo, G. 2016. Quercus cerris in Europe: distribution, habitat, usage and threats. – San-Miguel-Ayanz, J., de Rigo, D., Caudullo, G., Houston Durrant, T., Mauri, A. (eds.). European Atlas of Forest Tree Species. Luxembourg, Publications Office of the European Union, 148–149.
  9. Di Iorio, A., Lasserre, B., Scippa, G.S., Chiatante, D. 2007. Pattern of secondary thickening in a Quercus cerris root system. – Tree physiology, 27(3), 407–412. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/27.3.407.
  10. Ferrari, S., Allegretti, O., Cuccui, I., Moretti, N., Marra, M., Todaro, L. 2013. A revaluation of Turkey oak wood (Quercus cerris L.) through combined steaming and thermo-vacuum treatments. – BioResources, 8(4), 5051–5066.
  11. Fite, K. 2018. Managing oak wilt disease. – Research Laboratory Technical Report, The Bartlett Tree Research Laboratories. 3pp.
  12. Gilman, E.F., Watson, D.G. 1994. Quercus cerris-Turkey oak. – Fact Sheet ST-544. Gainesville, FL, University of Florida. 3 pp.
  13. Gottschalk, K.W., Wargo, P.M. 1997. Oak decline around the world. – Fosbroke, S.L.C., Gottschalk, K.W. (eds.). Proceedings of the U.S. Department of Agriculture Interagency Gypsy Moth Research Forum, United States, Jan. 1996. Annapolis, 3–13.
  14. Hedrick, U.P. 1919. Sturtevant’s Edible Plants of the World. Geneva, New York, New York Agricultural Experiment Station. 545.
  15. Hobby, G.H., Quave, C.L., Nelson, K., Compadre, C.M., Beenken, K.E., Smeltzer, M.S. 2012. Quercus cerris extracts limit Staphylococcus aureus biofilm formation. – Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 144(3), 812–815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2012.10.042.
  16. Lamp’l, J. 2021. Controlling or eliminating powdery mildew. [WWW document]. – URL https://www.growingagreenerworld.com/controlling-or-eliminating-powdery-mildew/. [Accessed 2 February 2021].
  17. Lebanon Flora. 2013. Quercus cerris L. [WWW document]. – URL http://www.lebanon-flora.org/species.php?id_pl=352&bp=fam&bp_fam=Fagaceae&bp_gen=Quercus. [Accessed 31 January 2021].
  18. Lonsdale, D. 2016. Powdery mildew of oak: a familiar sight with some hidden surprises. [WWW document]. – URL https://www.ancienttreeforum.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/Arb-mag-Spring-2016-powdery-mildew-of-oak.pdf. [Accessed 2 February 2021].
  19. Marçais, B., Desprez-Loustau, M.L. 2014. European oak powdery mildew: impact on trees, effects of environmental factors, and potential effects of climate change. – Annals of Forest Science, 71(6), 633–642. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13595-012-0252-x.
  20. Mert, A., Özkan, K., Şentürk, Ö, Negiz, M.G. 2016. Changing the potential distribution of Turkey oak (Quercus cerris L.) under climate change in Turkey. – Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 25(4), 1633–1638. https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes/62230.
  21. Moricca, S., Raggazi, A. 2008. Fungal endophytes in Mediterranean oak forests: a lesson from Discula quercina. – Phytopathology, 98(4), 380–386. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-98-4-0380.
  22. Ndreu, R., Shehi, M. 2021. New ways of combating chestnut blight canker. [WWW document]. – URL https://www.yumpu.com/en/document/view/28702412/new-ways-of-combating-chestnut-blight-canker. [Accessed 5 February 2021].
  23. Oh, E., Wingfield, B.D., Wingfield, M.J., Roux, J. 2011. First report of Phytophthora cinnamomi associated with stem cankers of Quercus cerris in South Africa. – New Disease Reports, 24, 11. http://dx.doi.org/10.5197/j.2044-0588.2011.024.011.
  24. Pinto, D., Franco, S.D., Silva, A.M., Cupara, S., Koskovac, M., Kojicic, K., Soares, S., Rodrigues, F., Sut, S., Dall’Acqua, S., Oliveira, M.B.P.P. 2019. Chemical characterization and bioactive properties of a coffee-like beverage prepared from Quercus cerris kernels. – Food & Function, 10, 2050–2060. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8FO02536C.
  25. Ragazzi, A., Moricca, S., Capretti, P., Dellavalle, I., Mancini, F., Turco, E. 2001. Endophytic fungi in Quercus cerris: isolation frequency in relation to phenological phase, tree health and the organ affected. – Phytopathologia Mediterranea, 40(2), 165–171.
  26. Ragazzi, A., Turco, E., Marianelli, L., Dellavalle, I., Moricca, S. 2007. Disease gradient of the anthracnose agent Apiognomonia quercina in a natural oak stand. – Phytopathologia Mediterranea, 46(3), 295–303.
  27. Rai, P.K. 2016. Impacts of particulate matter pollution on plants: Implications for environmental biomonitoring. – Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 129, 120–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2016.03.012.
  28. Saxena, P., Kulshrestha, U. 2016. Biochemical effects of air pollutants on plants. – Kulshrestha, U., Saxena, P. (eds.). Plant Responses to Air Pollution. Singapore, Springer, 59–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1201-3_6.
  29. Smailagić, A., Ristivojević, P., Dimkić, I., Pavlović, T., Zagorac, D.D., Veljović, S., Akšić, M.F., Meland, M., Natić, M. 2020. Radical scavenging and antimicrobial properties of polyphenol rich waste wood extracts. – Foods, 9(3), 319. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9030319.
  30. Şöhretoğlu, D., Ekizoğlu, M., Kiliç, E., Sakar, M.K. 2007. Antibacterial and antifungal activities of some Quercus species growing in Turkey. – FABAD Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 32(3), 127–130.
  31. Stafasani, M., Devolli, A., Feta, D., Shahinasi, E. 2018. The solubility of Turkey oak (Quercus cerris L.) wood in water. – Albanian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 634–640.
  32. Stafasani, M., Toromani, E. 2015. Growth-climate response of young Turkey oak (Quercus cerris L.) coppice forest stands along longitudinal gradient in Albania. – South-east European forestry, 6(1), 25–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.15177/seefor.15-05.
  33. Taib, M., Rezzak, Y., Bouyazza, L., Lyoussi, B. 2020. Medicinal uses, phytochemistry, and pharmacological activities of Quercus species. – Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 2020, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/1920683.
  34. Tantray, Y.R., Wani, M.S., Hussain, A. 2017. Genus Quercus: An overview. – International Journal of Advance Research in Science and Engineering, 6(8), 1880–1886.
  35. Tzvetkova, N., Kolarov, D. 1996. Effect of air pollution on carbohydrate and nutrients concentrations in some deciduous tree species. – Bulgarian Journal of Plant Physiology, 22(1–2), 53–63.
  36. Vannini, A., Valentini, R., Luisi, N. 1996. Impact of drought and Hypoxylon mediterraneum on oak decline in the Mediterranean region. – Annals of Forest Science, 53(2–3), 753–760. https://doi.org/10.1051/forest:19960251.
  37. Vinha, A.F., Barreira, J.C.M., Costa, A.S.G., Oliveira, M.B.P.P. 2016. A new age for Quercus spp. fruits: Review on nutritional and phytochemical composition and related biological activities of acorns. – Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety, 15(6), 947–981. https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-4337.12220.
  38. Weidlich, W.H. 1978. A preliminary report on a method of biological control of the chestnut blight not involving the use of a hypovirulent strain of Endothia parasitica. – Proceedings of the American Chestnut Symposium, USA, Jan. 1978. Morgantown, West Virginia, 79–83.
  39. Wilson, A.D. 2005. Recent advances in the control of oak wilt in the United States. – Plant Pathology Journal, 4(2), 177–191. https://dx.doi.org/10.3923/ppj.2005.177.191.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/fsmu-2021-0001 | Journal eISSN: 1736-8723 | Journal ISSN: 1406-9954
Language: English
Page range: 1 - 9
Submitted on: Dec 19, 2020
Accepted on: Feb 26, 2021
Published on: Dec 1, 2021
Published by: Estonian University of Life Sciences
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2021 Rola Najib, Tarek Houri, Yara Khairallah, Mahmoud Khalil, published by Estonian University of Life Sciences
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.