References
- Adiceam, F. 2016. How far can you see in a forest? – International Mathematics Research Notices, 2016(16), 4867–4881. https://doi.org/10.1093/imrn/rnv292.
- Anstey, R.L. 1964. Visibility measurements in forested areas. – Special Report S-4. Natick, Massachusetts, U.S. Army Natick Laboratories. 34 pp.
- Arumäe, T., Lang, M. 2018. Estimation of canopy cover in dense mixed-species forests using airborne lidar data. – European Journal of Remote Sensing, 51(1), 132–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/22797254.2017.1411169.
- ATP-3.2.1. 2018. NATO Standard No. 3.2.1: Allied Land Tactics. Edition B, Version 1. NATO Standardization Office (NSO). 302 pp.
- Chiang, Y.-C., Nasar, J.L., Ko, C.-C. 2014. Influence of visibility and situational threats on forest trail evaluations. – Landscape and Urban Planning, 125, 166–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.02.004.
- Chmielewski, S., Tompalski, P. 2017. Estimating outdoor advertising media visibility with voxel-based approach. – Applied Geography, 87, 1–13.
- Drummond, R.R., Lackey, E.E. 1956. Visibility in some forest stands of the United States. – Technical Report EP-36. Natick, Massachusetts, US Army Quartermaster Research & Development Center, Environmental protection research division. 25 pp.
- Hofmeester, T.R., Rowcliffe, J.M., Jansen, P.A. 2017. A simple method for estimating the effective detection distance of camera traps. – Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation, 3(2), 81–89. https://doi.org/10.1002/rse2.25.
- Korjus, H., Põllumäe, P., Kiviste, A., Kangur, A., Laarmann, D., Sirgmets, R., Lang, M. 2017. Online streaming public participation in forest management planning. – Forestry Studies / Metsanduslikud Uurimused, 66, 5–13. https://doi.org/10.1515/fsmu-2017-0001.
- Lang, M. 2001. Forest reflectance model as an interface between satellite images and forestry database. – Master's thesis. Tartu, Estonian Agricultural University (from 2004 onward, Estonian University of Life Sciences). 59 pp. (In Estonian with English summary).
- Lang, M., Nilson, T., Kuusk, A., Kiviste, A., Hordo, M. 2007. The performance of foliage mass and crown radius models in forming the input of a forest reflectance model: A test on forest growth sample plots and Landsat 7 ETM+ images. – Remote Sensing of Environment, 110, 445–457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2006.11.030.
- Li, Q., Nevalainen, P., Queralta, J.P., Heikkonen, J., Westerlund, T. 2020. Localization in unstructured environments: towards autonomous robots in forests with delaunay triangulation. – Remote Sensing, 12(11), 1870. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12111870.
- Lõhmus, E. 2004. Forest site types in Estonia. (Eesti metsakasvukohatüübid). Tartu, Eesti Loodusfoto. 80 pp. (In Estonian).
- McGaughey, R.J. 2018. FUSION/LDV: Software for LIDAR Data Analysis and Visualization. August 2018 – FUSION Version 3.80. United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station. 211 pp.
- Nilson, T. 1992. Radiative transfer in nonhomogeneous plant canopies. – Advances in Bioclimatology 1. Springer-Verlag, Berlin and Heidelberg, 59–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-58136-6_3.
- R Core Team. 2018. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. [WWW document] – URL https://www.R-project.org/. [Accessed 23 April 2018].
- Straatsma, M.W., Warmink, J.J., Middelkoop, H. 2008. Two novel methods for field measurements of hydrodynamic density of floodplain vegetation using terrestrial laser scanning and digital parallel photography. – International Journal of Remote Sensing, 29(5), 1595–1617. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431160701736455.
- Vukomanovic, J., Singh, K.K., Petrasova, A., Vogler, J.B. 2018. Not seeing the forest for the trees: Modeling exurban viewscapes with LiDAR. – Landscape and Urban Planning, 170, 169–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.10.010.
- Zasada, M., Stereńczak, K., Dudek, W.M., Rybski, A. 2013. Horizon visibility and accuracy of stocking determination on circular sample plots using automated remote measurement techniques. – Forest Ecology and Management, 302, 171–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2013.03.041.