Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Options for estimating horizontal visibility in hemiboreal forests using sparse airborne laser scanning data and forest inventory data Cover

Options for estimating horizontal visibility in hemiboreal forests using sparse airborne laser scanning data and forest inventory data

Open Access
|Mar 2021

Figures & Tables

Table 1

Description of the 70 sampling transects that were used for visibility prediction based on the forest inventory data. G is basal area, H100 the site index. A transect may extend over several forest stands.

Tabel 1. Takseertunnustele tuginevas nähtavuse simulatsioonkatses kasutatud vaatlustrasside kirjeldus neile jäävate eraldiste andmete põhjal. G on rinnaspindala, H100 on kõrgusindeks.

Dominant species
Enamuspuuliik
Age (yr)
Vanus (a)
G (m2 ha−1)H100 (m)Count of stands
Puistute arv
Pinus sylvestris L.85 (23–158)26 (2–45)24 (10–34)45
Betula pendula Roth, B. pubescens Ehrh.49 (22–93)20 (5–33)28 (18–33)28
Picea abies (L.) H. Karst.60 (38–117)24 (11–30)30 (23–34)15
Alnus glutinosa (L.) Gaertn.58 (22–77)22 (9–29)27 (24–34)5
Larix spp.3324401
Alnus incana (L.) Moench2014301
Figure 1

Observed visibility and the predicted 75th percentile of visibility using FI data. Transects were measured in April–May (black) and in September (green).

Joonis 1. Vaadeldud nähtavus ja metsa takseerandmete põhjal prognoositud nähtavuse 75-protsentiil. Trasse mõõdeti kevadel (mustad sümbolid) või septembris (rohelised sümbolid).

Figure 2

Model (6), (a) as applied to 2019 springtime ALS data with parameters estimated from 2017 summer ALS data, and (b) conversely. Transects were measured in April–May (black) and in September (green).

Joonis 2. Mudel (6) a) parameetrid lähendatud 2017. aasta suve lidariandmetel ja rakendatud 2019. aasta kevadistele andmetele, b) vastupidi. Trasse mõõdeti kevadel (mustad sümbolid) või septembris (rohelised sümbolid).

Table 2

Model parameters (ALS) with RSE the model residual error and DF the number of indicated degrees of freedom. The determination coefficient R2 for the nonlinear model (3) is an estimate. Insignificant values (p > 0.05) are in italics.

Tabel 2. Mudelite parameetrid (lidarandmetest). RSE on mudeli jääkviga, DF on vabadusastmete arv. Mittelineaarse mudeli (3) determinatsioonikordaja R2 kohta on antud hinnang. Mitteolulised väärtused (p > 0.05) on kursiivis.

Model
Mudel
Data
Andmed
Parameters / Parameetrid
abcdRSE (m)R2DF
320172.590.02328.3*0.6497
20191.980.01626.3*0.6997
4201714.38.0224.80.5597
201918.58.1125.10.5397
520174.596.080.36223.90.5996
20192.725.260.50623.80.5996
6201739.97.430.309−0.61021.80.6695
201928.47.730.438−0.65521.30.6795

* Estimated with equation (9).

Pinus sylvestris stand, long visibility distance.

Pinus sylvestris stand, medium visibility distance.

Populus tremula L. stand, long visibility distance.

Betula pendula stand, limited visibility distance.

Young Betula pendula stand, long visibility distance.

Young mixed broadleaf decidous stand, limited visibility distance.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/fsmu-2020-0019 | Journal eISSN: 1736-8723 | Journal ISSN: 1406-9954
Language: English, Estonian
Page range: 125 - 135
Submitted on: Nov 11, 2020
Accepted on: Dec 17, 2020
Published on: Mar 11, 2021
Published by: Estonian University of Life Sciences
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Related subjects:

© 2021 Mait Lang, Kersti Vennik, Andrus Põldma, Tiit Nilson, published by Estonian University of Life Sciences
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.