Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Mean height or dominant height – what to prefer for modelling the site index of Estonian forests? Cover

Mean height or dominant height – what to prefer for modelling the site index of Estonian forests?

Forestry Studies
Volume 72 (2020): Issue 1 (September 2020)
By: Toomas Tarmu,  Diana Laarmann and  Andres Kiviste  
Open Access
|Sep 2020

Authors

Toomas Tarmu

toomas.tarmu@emu.ee

Chair of Forest Management Planning and Wood Processing Technologies, Institute of Forestry and Rural Engineering, Estonian University of Life Sciences, Tartu, Estonia

Diana Laarmann

Chair of Forest Management Planning and Wood Processing Technologies, Institute of Forestry and Rural Engineering, Estonian University of Life Sciences, Tartu, Estonia

Andres Kiviste

Chair of Forest Management Planning and Wood Processing Technologies, Institute of Forestry and Rural Engineering, Estonian University of Life Sciences, Tartu, Estonia
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/fsmu-2020-0010 | Journal eISSN: 1736-8723 | Journal ISSN: 1406-9954
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 121 - 138
Submitted on: May 29, 2020
Accepted on: Jun 30, 2020
Published on: Sep 18, 2020
Published by: Estonian University of Life Sciences
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year
Keywords:
top height,
stand height growth,
permanent plot,
thinning,
growth model
Related subjects:
Life sciences,
Plant science,
Ecology,
Life sciences, other

© 2020 Toomas Tarmu, Diana Laarmann, Andres Kiviste, published by Estonian University of Life Sciences
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 72 (2020): Issue 1 (September 2020)