References
- Azzopardi, E., Nash, R. 2013. A critical evaluation of importance–performance analysis. – Tourism Management, 35, 222–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2012.07.007.
- Deng, J., McGill, D., Arbogast, D. 2017. Perceptions of challenges facing rural communities: An importance-performance analysis. – Tourism Analysis, 22, 219–236 https://doi.org/10.3727/108354217X14888192562401.
- EPFU. 2019. Members of the Estonian Private Forest Union. (Eesti Erametsaliidu liikmed). [WWW document]. – URL https://erametsaliit.ee/liidust/liikmed/. [Accessed 11 February 2019]. (In Estonian)
- Feliciano, D., Bouriaud, L., Brahic, E., Deuffic, P., Dobsinska, Z., Jarsky, V., Lawrence, A., Nybakk, E., Quiroga, S., Suarez, C., Ficko, A. 2017. Understanding private forest owners’ conceptualisation of forest management: Evidence from a survey in seven European countries. – Journal of Rural Studies, 54, 162–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.06.016.
- Ficko, A., Boncina, A. 2015. Forest owner representation of forest management and perception of resource efficiency: a structural equation modeling study. – Ecology and Society, 20(1), 36. http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-07189-200136.
- Ficko, A., Lidestav, G., Ní Dhubháin, Á., Karppinen, H., Zivojinovic, I., Westin, K. 2019. European private forest owner typologies: A review of methods and use. – Forest Policy and Economics, 99, 21–31 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2017.09.010.
- Forest policy. 1997. Approval of the Estonian forest policy. (Eesti metsapoliitika heakskiitmine). Riigi Teataja, RT I, 1997, 47, 768. (In Estonian).
- Hujala, T., Tikkanen, J. 2008. Boosters of and barriers to smooth communication in family forest owners’ decision making. – Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 23(5), 466–477. http://doi.org/10.1080/02827580802334209.
- Janota, J.J., Broussard, S.R. 2008. Examining private forest policy preferences. – Forest Policy and Economics, 10(3), 89–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2007.06.001.
- Karppinen, H. 2012. New forest owners and owners-to-be: apples and oranges? – Small-scale Forestry, 11, 15–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-011-9165-z.
- Keskkonnaagentuur. 2017. Yearbook Forest 2016. (Aastaraamat Mets 2016). Tallinn, Keskkonnaagentuur. 293 pp. (In Estonian).
- Krippendorff, K. 2004. Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. Los Angeleses, SAGE. 441 pp.
- Krott, M. 2005. Forest Policy Analysis. Dordrecht, Springer-Verlag.
- Lai, I.K.W., Hitchcock, M. 2015. Importance–performance analysis in tourism: A framework for researchers. – Tourism Management, 48, 242–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2014.11.008.
- Martilla, J.A., James, J.C. 1977. Importance–performance analysis. – Journal of Marketing, 41(1), 77–79.
- Matilainen, A., Koch, M., Zivojinovic, I., Lähdesmäki, M., Lidestav, G., Karppinen, H., Didolot, F., Jarsky, V., Põllumäe, P., Colson, V., Hricova, Z., Glavonjic, P., Scriban, R.E. 2019. Perceptions of ownership among new forest owners – A qualitative study in European context. – Forest Policy and Economics, 99, 43–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2018.06.002.
- Pivoriūnas, A., Lazdinis, M. 2004. Needs of private forest owners in the context of changing political systems: Lithuania as a case study. – Small-scale Forest Economics, Management and Policy, 3(2): 191–202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-004-0014-1.
- Private Forest Centre. 2018. Support system for private forest owner. (Tugisüsteem erametsaomanikule). [WWW document]. – URL http://www.eramets.ee/metsaomanike-koostoo-2/erametsanduse-tugisusteem/. [Accessed 19 August 2018]. (In Estonian).
- Põllumäe, P., Korjus, H. 2017. Estonian private forestry: a review of research and developments. – Baltic Forestry, 23(3), 724–733.
- Põllumäe, P., Korjus, H., Kaimre, P., Vahter, T. 2014. Motives and incentives for joining forest owner associations in Estonia. – Small-Scale Forestry, 13(1), 19–33. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-013-9237-3.
- Quiroga, S., Suarez, C., Ficko, A., Feliciano, D., Bouriaud, L., Brahic, E., Deuffic, P., Dobsinska, Z., Jarsky, V., Lawrence, A., Nybakk, E. 2019. What influences European private forest owners’ affinity for subsidies? – Forest Policy and Economics, 99, 136–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2018.08.008.
- R Core Team. 2018. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. [WWW document]. – URL https://www.R-project.org/. [Accessed 20 December 2019].
- Sarvašová, Z., Zivojinovic, I., Weiss, G., Dobšinská, Z., Drăgoi, M., Gál, J., Jarský, V., Mizaraite, D., Põllumäe, P., Šálka, J., Schiberna, E., Šišák, L., Wolfslehner, B., Zalite, Z., Zalitis, T. 2015. Forest owners associations in the Central and Eastern European region. – Small-scale Forestry, 14, 217–232. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-014-9283-5.
- Sarvašová, Z., Ali, T., Đorđević, I., Lukmine, D., Quiroga, S., Suárez, C., Hrib, M., Rondeux, J., Mantzanas, K.T., Franz, K. 2019. Natura 2000 payments for private forest owners in Rural Development Programmes 2007–2013 – a comparative view. – Forest Policy and Economics, 99, 123–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2017.08.019.
- Schaaf, K.A., Broussard, S.R. 2006. Private forest policy tools: A national survey exploring the American public’s perceptions and support. – Forest Policy and Economics, 9, 316–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2005.10.001.
- Serbruyns, I., Luyssaert, S. 2006. Acceptance of sticks, carrots and sermons as policy instruments for directing private forest management. – Forest Policy and Economics, 9, 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2005.06.012.
- Sever, I. 2015. Importance–performance analysis: A valid management tool? – Tourism Management, 48, 43–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2014.10.022.
- Snyder, S.A., Butler, B.J., Markowski-Lindsay, M. 2019. Small-area family forest ownerships in the USA. – Small-scale Forestry, 18, 127–147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-018-9410-9.
- Sotirov, M., Sallnäs, O., Eriksson, L.O. 2019. Forest owner behavioral models, policy changes, and forest management. An agent-based framework for studying the provision of forest ecosystem goods and services at the landscape level. – Forest Policy and Economics, 103, 79–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2017.10.015.
- Tikkanen, J., Isokääntä, T., Pykäläinen, J., Leskinen, P. 2006. Applying cognitive mapping approach to explore the objective-structure of forest owners in a Northern Finnish case area. – Forest Policy and Economics, 9, 139–152. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2005.04.001.
- Toivonen, R., Järvinen, E., Lindroos, K., Rämö, A.-K., Ripatti, P. 2005. The challenge of information service development for private forest owners: The Estonia and Finland cases. – Small-scale Forest Economics, Management and Policy, 4, 451–469. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-005-0028-3.
- Weiss, G., Lawrence, A., Lidestav, G., Feliciano, D., Hujala, T., Sarvašová, Z., Dobšinská, Z., Živojinović, I. 2019a. Research trends: Forest ownership in multiple perspectives. – Forest Policy and Economics, 99, 1–8. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2018.10.006.
- Weiss, G., Lawrence, A., Hujala, T., Lidestav, G., Nichiforel, L., Nybakk, E., Quiroga, S., Sarvašová, Z., Suarez, C., Živojinović, I. 2019b. Forest ownership changes in Europe: State of knowledge and conceptual foundations. – Forest Policy and Economics, 99, 9–20. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2018.03.003.