Reflections of active forest owners to the public-private forestry support system in Estonia

Põllumäe, Priit; Lilleleht, Ando; Korjus, Henn

doi:10.2478/fsmu-2019-0015

Abstract

Private forest owners are increasingly responsible for providing an extensive range of goods and services from their forests, as there are around 100,000 forest owners in Estonia. In order to support forest owners in providing these services, the state has continuously backed the forestry sector and established a public-private partnership with forest owners’ associations as well as their umbrella organisations and cooperatives. The aim of this paper is to identify the service and information needs of private forest owners in the context of this established support system. Using a survey sample of 757 respondents, we found that in regard to informational needs more focus should be put on forest management activities, i.e. on available information about service providers’ contacts, prices, options and principles for selling harvesting rights and timber. Furthermore, joint timber sales as a service should be further developed and focused on. While forest owners ranked highly both the information about financial support and the specific measures, they found the system sometimes too complicated. Both in terms of information and service importance-performance, forest owners indicated certification as a low-priority topic. Whilst interest representation in policy processes was indicated as a very important service, its performance was rated quite modestly indicating slight dissatisfaction with the current arrangements. There are also several socio-demographic attributes of forest owners that influence their needs for information and services about forest management. However, a better understanding of these attributes might help develop the system further.

References

Azzopardi, E., Nash, R. 2013. A critical evaluation of importance–performance analysis. – Tourism Management, 35, 222–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2012.07.007.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Deng, J., McGill, D., Arbogast, D. 2017. Perceptions of challenges facing rural communities: An importance-performance analysis. – Tourism Analysis, 22, 219–236 https://doi.org/10.3727/108354217X14888192562401.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
EPFU. 2019. Members of the Estonian Private Forest Union. (Eesti Erametsaliidu liikmed). [WWW document]. – URL https://erametsaliit.ee/liidust/liikmed/. [Accessed 11 February 2019]. (In Estonian)
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Feliciano, D., Bouriaud, L., Brahic, E., Deuffic, P., Dobsinska, Z., Jarsky, V., Lawrence, A., Nybakk, E., Quiroga, S., Suarez, C., Ficko, A. 2017. Understanding private forest owners’ conceptualisation of forest management: Evidence from a survey in seven European countries. – Journal of Rural Studies, 54, 162–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.06.016.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ficko, A., Boncina, A. 2015. Forest owner representation of forest management and perception of resource efficiency: a structural equation modeling study. – Ecology and Society, 20(1), 36. http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-07189-200136.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ficko, A., Lidestav, G., Ní Dhubháin, Á., Karppinen, H., Zivojinovic, I., Westin, K. 2019. European private forest owner typologies: A review of methods and use. – Forest Policy and Economics, 99, 21–31 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2017.09.010.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Forest policy. 1997. Approval of the Estonian forest policy. (Eesti metsapoliitika heakskiitmine). Riigi Teataja, RT I, 1997, 47, 768. (In Estonian).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hujala, T., Tikkanen, J. 2008. Boosters of and barriers to smooth communication in family forest owners’ decision making. – Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 23(5), 466–477. http://doi.org/10.1080/02827580802334209.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Janota, J.J., Broussard, S.R. 2008. Examining private forest policy preferences. – Forest Policy and Economics, 10(3), 89–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2007.06.001.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Karppinen, H. 2012. New forest owners and owners-to-be: apples and oranges? – Small-scale Forestry, 11, 15–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-011-9165-z.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Keskkonnaagentuur. 2017. Yearbook Forest 2016. (Aastaraamat Mets 2016). Tallinn, Keskkonnaagentuur. 293 pp. (In Estonian).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Krippendorff, K. 2004. Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. Los Angeleses, SAGE. 441 pp.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Krott, M. 2005. Forest Policy Analysis. Dordrecht, Springer-Verlag.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lai, I.K.W., Hitchcock, M. 2015. Importance–performance analysis in tourism: A framework for researchers. – Tourism Management, 48, 242–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2014.11.008.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Martilla, J.A., James, J.C. 1977. Importance–performance analysis. – Journal of Marketing, 41(1), 77–79.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Matilainen, A., Koch, M., Zivojinovic, I., Lähdesmäki, M., Lidestav, G., Karppinen, H., Didolot, F., Jarsky, V., Põllumäe, P., Colson, V., Hricova, Z., Glavonjic, P., Scriban, R.E. 2019. Perceptions of ownership among new forest owners – A qualitative study in European context. – Forest Policy and Economics, 99, 43–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2018.06.002.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Pivoriūnas, A., Lazdinis, M. 2004. Needs of private forest owners in the context of changing political systems: Lithuania as a case study. – Small-scale Forest Economics, Management and Policy, 3(2): 191–202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-004-0014-1.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Private Forest Centre. 2018. Support system for private forest owner. (Tugisüsteem erametsaomanikule). [WWW document]. – URL http://www.eramets.ee/metsaomanike-koostoo-2/erametsanduse-tugisusteem/. [Accessed 19 August 2018]. (In Estonian).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Põllumäe, P., Korjus, H. 2017. Estonian private forestry: a review of research and developments. – Baltic Forestry, 23(3), 724–733.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Põllumäe, P., Korjus, H., Kaimre, P., Vahter, T. 2014. Motives and incentives for joining forest owner associations in Estonia. – Small-Scale Forestry, 13(1), 19–33. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-013-9237-3.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Quiroga, S., Suarez, C., Ficko, A., Feliciano, D., Bouriaud, L., Brahic, E., Deuffic, P., Dobsinska, Z., Jarsky, V., Lawrence, A., Nybakk, E. 2019. What influences European private forest owners’ affinity for subsidies? – Forest Policy and Economics, 99, 136–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2018.08.008.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
R Core Team. 2018. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. [WWW document]. – URL https://www.R-project.org/. [Accessed 20 December 2019].
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Sarvašová, Z., Zivojinovic, I., Weiss, G., Dobšinská, Z., Drăgoi, M., Gál, J., Jarský, V., Mizaraite, D., Põllumäe, P., Šálka, J., Schiberna, E., Šišák, L., Wolfslehner, B., Zalite, Z., Zalitis, T. 2015. Forest owners associations in the Central and Eastern European region. – Small-scale Forestry, 14, 217–232. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-014-9283-5.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Sarvašová, Z., Ali, T., Đorđević, I., Lukmine, D., Quiroga, S., Suárez, C., Hrib, M., Rondeux, J., Mantzanas, K.T., Franz, K. 2019. Natura 2000 payments for private forest owners in Rural Development Programmes 2007–2013 – a comparative view. – Forest Policy and Economics, 99, 123–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2017.08.019.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Schaaf, K.A., Broussard, S.R. 2006. Private forest policy tools: A national survey exploring the American public’s perceptions and support. – Forest Policy and Economics, 9, 316–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2005.10.001.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Serbruyns, I., Luyssaert, S. 2006. Acceptance of sticks, carrots and sermons as policy instruments for directing private forest management. – Forest Policy and Economics, 9, 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2005.06.012.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Sever, I. 2015. Importance–performance analysis: A valid management tool? – Tourism Management, 48, 43–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2014.10.022.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Snyder, S.A., Butler, B.J., Markowski-Lindsay, M. 2019. Small-area family forest ownerships in the USA. – Small-scale Forestry, 18, 127–147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-018-9410-9.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Sotirov, M., Sallnäs, O., Eriksson, L.O. 2019. Forest owner behavioral models, policy changes, and forest management. An agent-based framework for studying the provision of forest ecosystem goods and services at the landscape level. – Forest Policy and Economics, 103, 79–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2017.10.015.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Tikkanen, J., Isokääntä, T., Pykäläinen, J., Leskinen, P. 2006. Applying cognitive mapping approach to explore the objective-structure of forest owners in a Northern Finnish case area. – Forest Policy and Economics, 9, 139–152. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2005.04.001.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Toivonen, R., Järvinen, E., Lindroos, K., Rämö, A.-K., Ripatti, P. 2005. The challenge of information service development for private forest owners: The Estonia and Finland cases. – Small-scale Forest Economics, Management and Policy, 4, 451–469. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-005-0028-3.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Weiss, G., Lawrence, A., Lidestav, G., Feliciano, D., Hujala, T., Sarvašová, Z., Dobšinská, Z., Živojinović, I. 2019a. Research trends: Forest ownership in multiple perspectives. – Forest Policy and Economics, 99, 1–8. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2018.10.006.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Weiss, G., Lawrence, A., Hujala, T., Lidestav, G., Nichiforel, L., Nybakk, E., Quiroga, S., Sarvašová, Z., Suarez, C., Živojinović, I. 2019b. Forest ownership changes in Europe: State of knowledge and conceptual foundations. – Forest Policy and Economics, 99, 9–20. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2018.03.003.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article

Reflections of active forest owners to the public-private forestry support system in Estonia

Abstract

Paradigm

My account